D. Oliveira, R. Tavares, A. Loss, B. Madari, C. Cerri, B. Alves, M. G. Pereira, M. Cherubin
{"title":"Climate-smart agriculture and soil C sequestration in Brazilian Cerrado: a systematic review","authors":"D. Oliveira, R. Tavares, A. Loss, B. Madari, C. Cerri, B. Alves, M. G. Pereira, M. Cherubin","doi":"10.36783/18069657rbcs20220055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices, mainly no-tillage (NT), cover cropping (CC), soil fertilization with organic amendments (OA), and crop-livestock (CL) and crop-livestock-forestry (CLF) systems, has been widely adopted in areas from Brazilian Cerrado. The CSA may partly offset former soil C losses and contribute to climate change mitigation. However, contradictory findings brought uncertainties about the effect of CSA on soil C. Here, by a systematic review of 87 papers and using 621 data pairs, we provided a pervasive biome-scale analysis of soil C stock changes associated with the adoption of CSA across Brazilian Cerrado. All CSA practices evaluated showed average positive rates of C stock change, indicating a general tendency of soil C accretion after its adoption. In areas under NT, CC and CLF, greater rates were estimated for the deeper soil profile evaluated (0.00-1.00 m) (1.24 ± 0.85, 0.54 ± 0.54 and 1.00 ± 1.47 Mg ha –1 yr –1 , respectively), while OA and CL showed more soil C accretion when the assessment was limited down to 0.10 m depth (0.82 ± 0.60 and 0.59 ± 0.66 Mg ha –1 yr –1 , respectively). Unfortunately, the lack of basic information precluded any attempt to statically compare our estimations. In this sense, we must be cautious in stating that soil C sequestration occurs at those rates after the adoption of CSA practices. Despite these limitations, the results clearly show that the diversification and intensification of agricultural areas in the Cerrado by the adoption of CSA is a promising pathway to increase soil C stocks, and consequently, contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Finally, our findings emphasize the importance of efforts that stimulate farmers to adopt these practices on large scale, such as Brazil’s Low-Carbon Agriculture Plan, besides providing sound empirical evidence about the role of soil C sequestration in Brazil achieving its Nationally Determined Contributions commitments.","PeriodicalId":21215,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20220055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
: Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices, mainly no-tillage (NT), cover cropping (CC), soil fertilization with organic amendments (OA), and crop-livestock (CL) and crop-livestock-forestry (CLF) systems, has been widely adopted in areas from Brazilian Cerrado. The CSA may partly offset former soil C losses and contribute to climate change mitigation. However, contradictory findings brought uncertainties about the effect of CSA on soil C. Here, by a systematic review of 87 papers and using 621 data pairs, we provided a pervasive biome-scale analysis of soil C stock changes associated with the adoption of CSA across Brazilian Cerrado. All CSA practices evaluated showed average positive rates of C stock change, indicating a general tendency of soil C accretion after its adoption. In areas under NT, CC and CLF, greater rates were estimated for the deeper soil profile evaluated (0.00-1.00 m) (1.24 ± 0.85, 0.54 ± 0.54 and 1.00 ± 1.47 Mg ha –1 yr –1 , respectively), while OA and CL showed more soil C accretion when the assessment was limited down to 0.10 m depth (0.82 ± 0.60 and 0.59 ± 0.66 Mg ha –1 yr –1 , respectively). Unfortunately, the lack of basic information precluded any attempt to statically compare our estimations. In this sense, we must be cautious in stating that soil C sequestration occurs at those rates after the adoption of CSA practices. Despite these limitations, the results clearly show that the diversification and intensification of agricultural areas in the Cerrado by the adoption of CSA is a promising pathway to increase soil C stocks, and consequently, contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Finally, our findings emphasize the importance of efforts that stimulate farmers to adopt these practices on large scale, such as Brazil’s Low-Carbon Agriculture Plan, besides providing sound empirical evidence about the role of soil C sequestration in Brazil achieving its Nationally Determined Contributions commitments.
气候智能型农业(CSA)实践,主要是免耕(NT)、覆盖种植(CC)、土壤有机施肥(OA)、作物-牲畜(CL)和作物-牲畜-林业(CLF)系统,已在巴西塞拉多地区广泛采用。CSA可部分抵消以前土壤C的损失,并有助于减缓气候变化。然而,相互矛盾的研究结果给CSA对土壤C的影响带来了不确定性。在此,通过对87篇论文和621对数据的系统回顾,我们对巴西塞拉多采用CSA的土壤C储量变化进行了普遍的生物群系尺度分析。所有评价的CSA措施均显示出平均碳储量变化阳性率,表明采用CSA措施后土壤碳总体呈增加趋势。在NT、CC和CLF覆盖范围内,评估深度为0.00-1.00 m(分别为1.24±0.85、0.54±0.54和1.00±1.47 Mg ha -1 yr -1)的土壤碳增加速率较高,而OA和CL在评估深度为0.10 m(分别为0.82±0.60和0.59±0.66 Mg ha -1 yr -1)的土壤碳增加速率较高。不幸的是,由于缺乏基本信息,无法对我们的估计进行静态比较。从这个意义上说,我们必须谨慎地指出,在采用CSA做法后,土壤碳的固存以这些速率发生。尽管存在这些局限性,但结果清楚地表明,通过采用CSA,塞拉多农业区的多样化和集约化是增加土壤C储量的有希望的途径,从而有助于减缓和适应气候变化。最后,我们的研究结果强调了刺激农民大规模采用这些做法的重要性,例如巴西的低碳农业计划,此外还提供了关于土壤碳封存在巴西实现其国家自主贡献承诺中的作用的可靠经验证据。
期刊介绍:
The Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society for Soil Science (SBCS), founded in 1947, and is responsible for the propagation of original and inedited technical-scientific work of interest for Soil Science.
Contributions must not have been previously published or submit to other periodicals, with the only exception of articles presented in summarized form at professional meetings. Literature reviews are accepted when solicited by the Editorial Board.