Response of cowpea plants submitted to acid conditions: Aluminum and hydrogen stress

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.36783/18069657rbcs20220107
Francisco Weliton Rocha Silva, José Zilton Lopes Santos
{"title":"Response of cowpea plants submitted to acid conditions: Aluminum and hydrogen stress","authors":"Francisco Weliton Rocha Silva, José Zilton Lopes Santos","doi":"10.36783/18069657rbcs20220107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aluminum (Al) is an important abiotic stress factor constricting the production of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in acid soil conditions. This study investigated the effect of Al and pH levels on the photosynthesis, proline accumulation, and nutritional status of two cowpea cultivars. Two pot experiments under greenhouse conditions were performed concurrently. Each experiment was carried out using a completely randomized design, in a factorial scheme 2 × 3 +1, in which each cultivar was exposed to two levels of Al (0.0 and 1.0 mmol L -1 ) and three levels of pH (3.3; 4.0, and 4.7), plus a control. There was an interaction effect of the factors Al and pH reducing significantly the internal CO 2 concentration (Ci) for BRS Caldeirão, and transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) for BRS Tracuateua, notably under growth conditions with Al (1 mmol L -1 ) and pH value of 4.7. For BRS Caldeirão, proline content was significantly reduced by the isolated effect of the factors Al and pH on shoot tissue. For BRS Tracuateua, proline content was significant only in roots, indicating a metabolic response to water stress damage. Under growth conditions with Al and pH value of 3.3, there was an improvement in nutrient uptake and accumulation according to nutritional status of both cultivars. In summary, cowpea response pointed that physiological, biochemical, and nutritional aspects of both cultivars improved at the lowest pH of 3.3 under Al-stress, and also that cv. BRS Tracuteua was less tolerant than BRS Caldeirão.","PeriodicalId":21215,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20220107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) is an important abiotic stress factor constricting the production of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in acid soil conditions. This study investigated the effect of Al and pH levels on the photosynthesis, proline accumulation, and nutritional status of two cowpea cultivars. Two pot experiments under greenhouse conditions were performed concurrently. Each experiment was carried out using a completely randomized design, in a factorial scheme 2 × 3 +1, in which each cultivar was exposed to two levels of Al (0.0 and 1.0 mmol L -1 ) and three levels of pH (3.3; 4.0, and 4.7), plus a control. There was an interaction effect of the factors Al and pH reducing significantly the internal CO 2 concentration (Ci) for BRS Caldeirão, and transpiration (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) for BRS Tracuateua, notably under growth conditions with Al (1 mmol L -1 ) and pH value of 4.7. For BRS Caldeirão, proline content was significantly reduced by the isolated effect of the factors Al and pH on shoot tissue. For BRS Tracuateua, proline content was significant only in roots, indicating a metabolic response to water stress damage. Under growth conditions with Al and pH value of 3.3, there was an improvement in nutrient uptake and accumulation according to nutritional status of both cultivars. In summary, cowpea response pointed that physiological, biochemical, and nutritional aspects of both cultivars improved at the lowest pH of 3.3 under Al-stress, and also that cv. BRS Tracuteua was less tolerant than BRS Caldeirão.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豇豆植株对酸性条件的响应:铝和氢胁迫
铝(Al)是制约豇豆(Vigna unguiculata (L.))生产的重要非生物胁迫因子。在酸性土壤条件下。研究了铝和pH对两个豇豆品种光合作用、脯氨酸积累和营养状况的影响。两个盆栽试验在温室条件下同时进行。试验采用完全随机设计,2 × 3 +1析因方案,每个品种暴露于2个水平的铝(0.0和1.0 mmol L -1)和3个水平的pH (3.3;4.0和4.7),加上一个对照。Al和pH的交互作用显著降低了BRS caldeir的内部co2浓度(Ci)和BRS Tracuateua的蒸腾(E)和气孔导度(gs),特别是在Al (1 mmol L -1)和pH值为4.7的生长条件下。对于BRS caldeir o,脯氨酸含量因Al和pH对茎部组织的单独影响而显著降低。对于BRS Tracuateua,脯氨酸含量仅在根中显著,表明对水分胁迫损害的代谢响应。在Al和pH值为3.3的生长条件下,两个品种的营养状况不同,对养分的吸收和积累均有改善。综上所述,在铝胁迫下,最低pH为3.3时,豇豆的生理、生化和营养方面均有改善;BRS Tracuteua的耐受性低于BRS caldeir
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
32
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society for Soil Science (SBCS), founded in 1947, and is responsible for the propagation of original and inedited technical-scientific work of interest for Soil Science. Contributions must not have been previously published or submit to other periodicals, with the only exception of articles presented in summarized form at professional meetings. Literature reviews are accepted when solicited by the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Adapting the land agricultural suitability assessment scheme for drylands edaphoclimatic conditions Educational procedures guided by emancipatory principles for education on soils in higher education: A proposal Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance Biogenic and physicogenic aggregates as indicators of quality in soils with sandy texture in areas of organic agriculture Identifying appropriate reference ecosystems based on soil indicators to evaluate postmining reclamation: A multivariate framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1