Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie
{"title":"Energetic and economic analysis of vapour compression refrigeration systems applied in different temperature ranges","authors":"Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie","doi":"10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.","PeriodicalId":35587,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.