Energetic and economic analysis of vapour compression refrigeration systems applied in different temperature ranges

Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie
{"title":"Energetic and economic analysis of vapour compression refrigeration systems applied in different temperature ranges","authors":"Zhili Sun, Cui Qi, Qingzhao Liu, Caiyun Wang, Jiamei Li, Yang Lijie","doi":"10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.","PeriodicalId":35587,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33430/v27n3thie-2018-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the suitable vapour compression refrigeration system for different temperature ranges, this paper established thermodynamic models for a single-stage vapour compression refrigeration system with an economiser (SSRS+E), a two-stage vapour compression refrigeration system (TSRS), and a cascade vapour compression refrigeration system (CRS) and conducted an energetic and economic analysis of it. The results show that compared with TSRS, SSRS+E can save energy by 13.6% and 7.1%, in the evaporating temperatures of -20°C and -25°C, respectively. R744/R717 CRS is superior to TSRS in terms of energy consumption and refrigeration unit investment costs. Compared with TSRS, R744/R717 CRS can save energy by 14.1% and 18.8%, in the evaporating temperatures of -45°C and -50°C, respectively. Based on the energetic and economic analysis, SSRS+E is recommended for use above the evaporating temperature of -25°C. TSRS is recommended for use in the evaporating temperature range of -45°C to -25°C, and R744/R717 CRS is recommended for use below the evaporating temperature of -45°C.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同温度范围下蒸汽压缩制冷系统的能量和经济分析
为了确定适合不同温度范围的蒸汽压缩制冷系统,本文分别建立了单级省煤器蒸汽压缩制冷系统(SSRS+E)、两级蒸汽压缩制冷系统(TSRS)和叶栅蒸汽压缩制冷系统(CRS)的热力学模型,并对其进行了能量和经济分析。结果表明,在蒸发温度为-20℃和-25℃时,与TSRS相比,SSRS+E分别节能13.6%和7.1%。R744/R717 CRS在能耗和制冷机组投资成本方面优于TSRS。与TSRS相比,R744/R717 CRS在蒸发温度为-45℃和-50℃时分别节能14.1%和18.8%。基于能量和经济分析,SSRS+E推荐在蒸发温度-25℃以上使用。推荐在-45℃~ -25℃蒸发温度范围内使用TSRS,推荐在-45℃蒸发温度以下使用R744/R717 CRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
First of its kind in Hong Kong - innovative reuse of treated effluent and enhanced energy efficiency for air-conditioning systems Class A Prediction Symposium on Debris Flow Impact Forces on Single and Dual Barriers Simulation-based quantitative methods for vehicle emissions and a CO2 charging policy Land use change in Dhaka City Corporation Area and its impact on transportation: A way forward towards integration into national policies A bibliometric study of carbon neutrality: 2001-2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1