Locating Agency: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Professional Ethics and Archival Morality

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.19.1.172
D. Wallace
{"title":"Locating Agency: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Professional Ethics and Archival Morality","authors":"D. Wallace","doi":"10.3172/JIE.19.1.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe world is on fire. Societies all over the world struggle incessantly and aggressively over the control of information to shape commonly held understandings of the present and the meaning to be derived from the past. These constructions and reconstructions have the potential to both legitimate and operate in opposition to structures of domination and injustice. Such dynamics feature regularly in the mass media. Consider the following:* Scholarly access to the world's largest Holocaust archives- the International Tracing Service (ITS)-had, until recently, been denied for over sixty years. This is remarkable given that these files were likely to reveal the names of unknown victims and shed new light on the structure and administration of forced labor and extermination camps.* Japan's ongoing struggles to remove from its high school textbooks long acknowledged responsibility for major war crimes committed by the Imperial Army during World War II.* How political considerations regularly confound attempts in the U.S. to formally recognize the Armenian genocide of the early twentieth century. Turkey continues to forcefully deny its responsibility for this genocide, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and uses its geostrategic importance to the U.S. to defeat recognition.* Key portions of Serbia's military archives from the Bosnian war were withheld from the International Court of Justice, leading several insiders to comment that such secrecy helped to absolve Serbia from charges of genocide and exempt it from monetary reparations.* Access to Bulgaria's cold war intelligence archives was contested amidst charges that they would identify current political and business leaders as collaborators with the communist era security services.* Brown University recently mined its archives as part of an effort to investigate its historical culpability in slavery and the slave trade. It launched a series of public events to stimulate discussion on institutional responses to the relationship between the present and past injustices.* In 2006, a U.S. National Archives audit found that up to one-third of 25,000 documents secretly removed from public access at its facilities since 1999 were inappropriately re-classified by various agencies.What is striking from these examples is not isolated to their profound nature. Equally remarkable is their ordinariness. A myriad of similar struggles could have easily been highlighted. The intersection among archives, professional ethics, archival praxis, the agency of individual archivists, and struggles for social justice is constantly at play across the globe. In such settings, archives and archivists can serve as instruments for sustaining, undermining, and challenging power and injustice. Yet, normative discussions of archival ethics largely evade these issues, and the promulgation of professional codes of ethics provides little value for understanding and reacting to these complexities.Given these evasions, this paper examines how voices within disciplines external to archives have engaged their own professional ethics as a means for illuminating these deeper issues. It notes how they have done so by recognizing and acknowledging professional ethics as a terrain far more complex and difficult than normative constructions allow. Although I point to this problematizing of professional ethics witnessed in anthropology, sociology, business, medicine, bioethics, philosophy, communications, history, post modernism and even the maturing ethics practitioners profession, I do not offer their insights as direct analogies to archival contexts per se. Instead, I contend that these literatures and discourses can assist the archival profession in deepening and enriching its construction and reconstruction of professional ethics. This knowledge and insight is organized along a number of key themes: professionalism; professional codes of ethics; professional and individual psychological connectedness; historically informed analyses, and strivings towards social justice, which is given sustained treatment. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"172-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

IntroductionThe world is on fire. Societies all over the world struggle incessantly and aggressively over the control of information to shape commonly held understandings of the present and the meaning to be derived from the past. These constructions and reconstructions have the potential to both legitimate and operate in opposition to structures of domination and injustice. Such dynamics feature regularly in the mass media. Consider the following:* Scholarly access to the world's largest Holocaust archives- the International Tracing Service (ITS)-had, until recently, been denied for over sixty years. This is remarkable given that these files were likely to reveal the names of unknown victims and shed new light on the structure and administration of forced labor and extermination camps.* Japan's ongoing struggles to remove from its high school textbooks long acknowledged responsibility for major war crimes committed by the Imperial Army during World War II.* How political considerations regularly confound attempts in the U.S. to formally recognize the Armenian genocide of the early twentieth century. Turkey continues to forcefully deny its responsibility for this genocide, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and uses its geostrategic importance to the U.S. to defeat recognition.* Key portions of Serbia's military archives from the Bosnian war were withheld from the International Court of Justice, leading several insiders to comment that such secrecy helped to absolve Serbia from charges of genocide and exempt it from monetary reparations.* Access to Bulgaria's cold war intelligence archives was contested amidst charges that they would identify current political and business leaders as collaborators with the communist era security services.* Brown University recently mined its archives as part of an effort to investigate its historical culpability in slavery and the slave trade. It launched a series of public events to stimulate discussion on institutional responses to the relationship between the present and past injustices.* In 2006, a U.S. National Archives audit found that up to one-third of 25,000 documents secretly removed from public access at its facilities since 1999 were inappropriately re-classified by various agencies.What is striking from these examples is not isolated to their profound nature. Equally remarkable is their ordinariness. A myriad of similar struggles could have easily been highlighted. The intersection among archives, professional ethics, archival praxis, the agency of individual archivists, and struggles for social justice is constantly at play across the globe. In such settings, archives and archivists can serve as instruments for sustaining, undermining, and challenging power and injustice. Yet, normative discussions of archival ethics largely evade these issues, and the promulgation of professional codes of ethics provides little value for understanding and reacting to these complexities.Given these evasions, this paper examines how voices within disciplines external to archives have engaged their own professional ethics as a means for illuminating these deeper issues. It notes how they have done so by recognizing and acknowledging professional ethics as a terrain far more complex and difficult than normative constructions allow. Although I point to this problematizing of professional ethics witnessed in anthropology, sociology, business, medicine, bioethics, philosophy, communications, history, post modernism and even the maturing ethics practitioners profession, I do not offer their insights as direct analogies to archival contexts per se. Instead, I contend that these literatures and discourses can assist the archival profession in deepening and enriching its construction and reconstruction of professional ethics. This knowledge and insight is organized along a number of key themes: professionalism; professional codes of ethics; professional and individual psychological connectedness; historically informed analyses, and strivings towards social justice, which is given sustained treatment. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定位机构:职业伦理与档案道德的跨学科视角
世界着火了。世界各地的社会都在不断地激烈地争夺对信息的控制,以形成对现在和从过去得来的意义的普遍理解。这些建构和重建有可能使统治和不公正的结构合法化,并与之相对立。这种动态经常出现在大众传媒中。考虑以下情况:*直到最近,60多年来,学者们一直无法进入世界上最大的大屠杀档案——国际寻人服务处(ITS)。这些文件很有可能公开不知名受害者的姓名,并揭示强制劳动和灭绝营的结构和管理,因此值得关注。*日本正在努力从高中教科书中删除日本皇军在第二次世界大战期间犯下的重大战争罪行。*在美国,政治考虑如何经常使正式承认20世纪初亚美尼亚种族灭绝的尝试陷入混乱。尽管有压倒性的证据表明事实恰恰相反,但土耳其继续强烈否认对这场种族灭绝负有责任,并利用其对美国的地缘战略重要性来挫败承认。*塞尔维亚波斯尼亚战争时期军事档案的关键部分向国际法院(International Court of Justice)隐瞒,导致几位内部人士评论说,这种保密有助于免除塞尔维亚的种族灭绝指控,并使其免于货币赔偿。*查阅保加利亚冷战时期的情报档案引发争议,有人指控这些档案会将当前的政治和商业领袖视为共产主义时期安全部门的合作者。*布朗大学最近挖掘了它的档案,作为调查它在奴隶制和奴隶贸易方面的历史罪责的一部分。它发起了一系列公共活动,以激发对当前和过去不公正之间关系的制度反应的讨论。* 2006年,美国国家档案馆的一项审计发现,自1999年以来,在其设施内秘密移出的2.5万份文件中,有多达三分之一被不同机构不当地重新分类。这些例子的惊人之处并不孤立于它们深刻的本质。同样引人注目的是它们的平凡。无数类似的挣扎本可以很容易地被强调出来。档案、职业道德、档案实践、个人档案工作者的代理和争取社会正义之间的交集在全球范围内不断发挥作用。在这种情况下,档案和档案工作者可以作为维持、破坏和挑战权力和不公正的工具。然而,档案伦理的规范性讨论在很大程度上回避了这些问题,而职业道德规范的颁布对于理解和应对这些复杂性几乎没有价值。鉴于这些回避,本文考察了档案馆外部学科中的声音如何将自己的职业道德作为阐明这些更深层次问题的手段。它注意到他们是如何通过认识和承认职业道德是一个比规范结构所允许的复杂和困难得多的领域来做到这一点的。虽然我指出,在人类学、社会学、商学、医学、生命伦理学、哲学、传播学、历史学、后现代主义,甚至是成熟的伦理学实践者职业中,职业道德都出现了这种问题,但我并没有把他们的见解直接类比为档案背景本身。相反,我认为这些文献和话语可以帮助档案行业深化和丰富其职业道德的建设和重建。这些知识和见解是沿着一些关键主题组织的:专业精神;职业道德规范;职业和个人心理联系;对历史的分析,以及对社会正义的努力,这些都得到了持续的治疗。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1