{"title":"Digitization as Repatriation?: The National Museum of the American Indian's Fourth Museum Project","authors":"Michelle Crouch","doi":"10.3172/JIE.19.1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionOn February 2, 2009, the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) announced the launch of its searchable online collection, part of an ongoing effort to digitize all of its artifacts and photographs. This event marked a milestone in the institution's \"Fourth Museum\" project-a reference to the \"museum without walls\" that serves the public outside of its three facilities in New York, Maryland, and D.C. (NMAI, 2009). With a particular focus on the digitization of the museum's photographic archives, this essay situates the Fourth Museum in its historical context, and then explores the possibilities and problematic issues of making these materials available on the Internet.NMAI and NAGPRAThe creation of the Fourth Museum is only the latest in a series of dramatic changes that NMAI has undergone in its ninety-three years of existence. NMAI began as the pet project of wealthy industrialist George G. Heye. The museum, arranged on the model of other established anthropology and natural history museums, displayed his personal collection of over 800,000 Native American artifacts purchased or collected on archaeological expeditions he financed. Many of the photographs were taken on these expeditions. The level of documentation of the acquisition of these objects varied, often depending on whether Heye purchased a large preexisting collection (in which case any prior documentation was often lost) or whether his field researchers collected the objects individually (in which case he required the inclusion of field notes) (Jacknis, 2008, p. 10).Initially displayed at the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archeology and Anthropology, Heye moved his collection to New York and formally founded the Museum of the American Indian as an independent entity in 1916. During the Great Depression and the Second World War, the museum fell into a period of stagnation and financial troubles that lasted until Heye's death in 1956. These problems plagued successive directors over the next three decades. Frederick J. Dockstader, who served as director from 1960 to 1975, was accused of unethically deaccessioning and selling portions of the collection in order to fund new acquisitions (NMAI, n.d.).Over the second half of the twentieth century, the fields of history and anthropology underwent radical changes; new historians presented the experiences and stories of underrepresented groups-told in their own words-as a challenge to the focus on the \"Great Man\" in history. Ethnographic observations of \"exotic\" cultures recorded by Westerners came into question. Political activism was often tied into ethnic identity and representation; the Red Power movement, for example, sought greater respect and equal treatment for Native Americans. This shift towards multiculturalism affected the traditional conception of the museum as well. Many essays on the topic reflect a postmodern self-consciousness in the museum world, a desire to draw attention to the \"constructedness\" of the exhibit and give a voice to \"members of the community represented in exhibitions,\" in addition to the traditional voice of the curator (Lavine, 1991, p. 151).In 1989, the Smithsonian Institution acquired the MAI, at which point \"National\" was appended to its title. The reopening of the museum reflected a fundamentally different attitude towards its collection - with W. Richard West Jr. (Southern Cheyenne) as director, the mission shifted towards collaborating with indigenous groups and documenting their contemporary lives as well as their history. This necessitated a change in almost all collection and exhibition policies. After shuttering the original location, the Smithsonian opened the George G. Heye Center in New York City in 1994 and the Cultural Resource Center in Suitland, Maryland in 1999. It has been the addition of the National Museum of the American Indian on the National Mall in Washington D.C., opened to the public in 2004, that has attracted the most attention, however, and generally mentions of the NMAI refer primarily to the exhibitions and facilities of this building. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
IntroductionOn February 2, 2009, the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) announced the launch of its searchable online collection, part of an ongoing effort to digitize all of its artifacts and photographs. This event marked a milestone in the institution's "Fourth Museum" project-a reference to the "museum without walls" that serves the public outside of its three facilities in New York, Maryland, and D.C. (NMAI, 2009). With a particular focus on the digitization of the museum's photographic archives, this essay situates the Fourth Museum in its historical context, and then explores the possibilities and problematic issues of making these materials available on the Internet.NMAI and NAGPRAThe creation of the Fourth Museum is only the latest in a series of dramatic changes that NMAI has undergone in its ninety-three years of existence. NMAI began as the pet project of wealthy industrialist George G. Heye. The museum, arranged on the model of other established anthropology and natural history museums, displayed his personal collection of over 800,000 Native American artifacts purchased or collected on archaeological expeditions he financed. Many of the photographs were taken on these expeditions. The level of documentation of the acquisition of these objects varied, often depending on whether Heye purchased a large preexisting collection (in which case any prior documentation was often lost) or whether his field researchers collected the objects individually (in which case he required the inclusion of field notes) (Jacknis, 2008, p. 10).Initially displayed at the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archeology and Anthropology, Heye moved his collection to New York and formally founded the Museum of the American Indian as an independent entity in 1916. During the Great Depression and the Second World War, the museum fell into a period of stagnation and financial troubles that lasted until Heye's death in 1956. These problems plagued successive directors over the next three decades. Frederick J. Dockstader, who served as director from 1960 to 1975, was accused of unethically deaccessioning and selling portions of the collection in order to fund new acquisitions (NMAI, n.d.).Over the second half of the twentieth century, the fields of history and anthropology underwent radical changes; new historians presented the experiences and stories of underrepresented groups-told in their own words-as a challenge to the focus on the "Great Man" in history. Ethnographic observations of "exotic" cultures recorded by Westerners came into question. Political activism was often tied into ethnic identity and representation; the Red Power movement, for example, sought greater respect and equal treatment for Native Americans. This shift towards multiculturalism affected the traditional conception of the museum as well. Many essays on the topic reflect a postmodern self-consciousness in the museum world, a desire to draw attention to the "constructedness" of the exhibit and give a voice to "members of the community represented in exhibitions," in addition to the traditional voice of the curator (Lavine, 1991, p. 151).In 1989, the Smithsonian Institution acquired the MAI, at which point "National" was appended to its title. The reopening of the museum reflected a fundamentally different attitude towards its collection - with W. Richard West Jr. (Southern Cheyenne) as director, the mission shifted towards collaborating with indigenous groups and documenting their contemporary lives as well as their history. This necessitated a change in almost all collection and exhibition policies. After shuttering the original location, the Smithsonian opened the George G. Heye Center in New York City in 1994 and the Cultural Resource Center in Suitland, Maryland in 1999. It has been the addition of the National Museum of the American Indian on the National Mall in Washington D.C., opened to the public in 2004, that has attracted the most attention, however, and generally mentions of the NMAI refer primarily to the exhibitions and facilities of this building. …
2009年2月2日,史密森尼美洲印第安人国家博物馆(NMAI)宣布推出可搜索的在线收藏,这是其所有文物和照片数字化努力的一部分。这一事件标志着该机构“第四博物馆”项目的一个里程碑——这是对“没有围墙的博物馆”的参考,它在纽约、马里兰和华盛顿特区的三个设施之外为公众服务(NMAI, 2009)。本文特别关注博物馆摄影档案的数字化,将第四博物馆置于其历史背景中,然后探讨将这些材料在互联网上提供的可能性和问题。第四博物馆的创建只是NMAI在其93年的历史中经历的一系列戏剧性变化中的最新一次。NMAI最初是富有的实业家乔治·g·海耶(George G. Heye)的宠儿项目。该博物馆以其他已建立的人类学和自然历史博物馆为蓝本,展示了他在资助的考古探险中购买或收集的80多万件美洲原住民文物的个人收藏。许多照片都是在这些探险中拍摄的。获取这些物品的文件水平各不相同,通常取决于Heye是否购买了大量先前存在的收藏品(在这种情况下,任何先前的文件都经常丢失),或者他的实地研究人员是否单独收集了这些物品(在这种情况下,他需要包括实地笔记)(Jacknis, 2008,第10页)。最初在宾夕法尼亚大学考古与人类学博物馆展出,海耶将他的收藏搬到了纽约,并于1916年正式成立了美国印第安人博物馆,作为一个独立的实体。在大萧条和第二次世界大战期间,博物馆陷入了停滞和财政困难的时期,一直持续到1956年海耶去世。在接下来的30年里,这些问题困扰着历任董事。1960年至1975年担任该馆馆长的弗雷德里克·j·多克斯塔德(Frederick J. Dockstader)被指控不道德地转让和出售部分藏品,以资助新的收购(NMAI, n.d)。20世纪下半叶,历史学和人类学领域发生了根本性的变化;新历史学家以他们自己的语言讲述那些未被充分代表的群体的经历和故事,作为对关注历史上“伟人”的挑战。西方人对“异域”文化的民族志观察也受到了质疑。政治激进主义常常与种族认同和代表联系在一起;例如,红色力量运动为印第安人争取更多的尊重和平等待遇。这种向多元文化主义的转变也影响了博物馆的传统观念。许多关于这一主题的文章反映了博物馆界的后现代自我意识,一种将注意力吸引到展览的“建构性”上的愿望,以及除了策展人的传统声音之外,给“展览中所代表的社区成员”一个声音(Lavine, 1991,第151页)。1989年,史密森学会收购了MAI,在这一点上,“国家”被附加到它的标题。博物馆的重新开放反映了对其藏品的一种根本不同的态度——由W. Richard West Jr.(南夏安族)担任馆长,使命转向与土著群体合作,记录他们的当代生活和历史。这就需要改变几乎所有的收藏和展览政策。在关闭了原馆址后,史密森学会于1994年在纽约市开设了乔治·g·海伊中心,并于1999年在马里兰州的苏特兰开设了文化资源中心。2004年,位于华盛顿特区国家广场的美国印第安人国家博物馆向公众开放,这吸引了最多的关注,然而,通常提到的NMAI主要指的是这座建筑的展览和设施。…