The Commodification of Blackness in David LaChapelle's Rize

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2010-09-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.19.2.52
K. Kuehn
{"title":"The Commodification of Blackness in David LaChapelle's Rize","authors":"K. Kuehn","doi":"10.3172/JIE.19.2.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2005, fashion photographer David LaChapelle released Rize, a feature-length documentary about the inner-city Los Angeles dance movements of \"clowning\" and \"krumping.\" The prestige-press lauded Rize as \"a celebration\" (Scott, 2005), a spectacular \"visual miracle,\" and \"unexpected knockout\" (Travers, 2005). Many popular film critics praised Rize for revealing \"another side\" of South Central L.A., where young people use the art of dance to \"rise\" out of their social hardships. Most commonly, the film received accolades for its uplifting message. A review in the Washington Post, for example, noted: \"That in disenfranchised communities beset by multiple blights of poverty, drugs and gang violence, there have always been stubborn, heroic artistic responses. This is simply one of the most dramatic and one of the most inspiring\" (Harrington, 2005, p. WE37). In qualifying their admiration, critics commonly referred to the story as a \"feel-good\" movie about \"hope sprouting where there should be none\" (Burr, 2005, par. 1). Clowning and krumping were repeatedly treated as \"salvational subcultures\" (Harrington, p. WE37) that have \"provided young African-Americans-most stranded in the war zones of South Central-a path away from the guns'n'poses of the area's self-styled gangstas and drug lords\" (Brunson, 2005).The director, LaChapelle, is an internationally renowned photographer noted for his high-fashion celebrity photographs taken on surreal, extraordinary sets; thus, the film as a visual phenomenon is no surprise. His artwork typically plays with themes of excess aesthetically conveyed by a spectacular use of color and camp. LaChapelle's fantastic, vivid, and bizarre aesthetics are identifiable traits that run across his multi-media vita of music videos, advertisements, fashion, and fine art photography. Regarding his auteur status LaChapelle states, \"My pictures are entertainment, an escape from the world we live in today. I never deal with death and violence; they're too everyday\" (\"High Fashion Fantasies,\" 1998, p. 54). Applying this statement to Rize poses a number of questions regarding the ethical and social responsibilities of a documentarian; one such question might ask how LaChapelle reconciles his own logic within a film made about the gritty, tough streets of South Central where death and violence for many of the area's constituents are \"everyday\" phenomena?Although his statement can be read in a number of ways, this paper argues that LaChapelle's own artistic vision ultimately compromises his role as a social documentarian of an inner-city struggle. If documentarians \"speak for the interests of others\" (Nichols, 2001, p. 3), then a number of ethical issues arise in the act of representing a community of which the storyteller is not a part. Structures of power, for instance, are implicit to the re-presenter/re-presented relationship and complicated by inherent social, cultural, and economic differences of either party (consciously or not). At the same time, it is possible that even highly reflexive modes of filmmaking and film criticism are privy to an essentializing discourse that predetermines a filmmaker's racial and class identity as inextricably at odds with the social actors he or she has represented on film. This research is no exception. Thus, this paper makes no claim to whether or not a white, wealthy, internationally-renowned popular artist is capable of bracketing his own subjective identity to adequately depict the \"objective reality\" of a black inner-city subculture. Instead, this research reveals through close textual analysis a number of highly structured formal codes that situate LaChapelle within the film despite his physical absence. Further, these codes offer insight to how the filmmaker views himself in relationship not only to the film's social actors, but to black culture as well.The tendency to romanticize black folk culture with \"images of the black working class and inner-city dwellers as somehow inoculated from the devastation of their surroundings\" is common in filmmaking, according to Johnson (2003, p. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"52-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.19.2.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2005, fashion photographer David LaChapelle released Rize, a feature-length documentary about the inner-city Los Angeles dance movements of "clowning" and "krumping." The prestige-press lauded Rize as "a celebration" (Scott, 2005), a spectacular "visual miracle," and "unexpected knockout" (Travers, 2005). Many popular film critics praised Rize for revealing "another side" of South Central L.A., where young people use the art of dance to "rise" out of their social hardships. Most commonly, the film received accolades for its uplifting message. A review in the Washington Post, for example, noted: "That in disenfranchised communities beset by multiple blights of poverty, drugs and gang violence, there have always been stubborn, heroic artistic responses. This is simply one of the most dramatic and one of the most inspiring" (Harrington, 2005, p. WE37). In qualifying their admiration, critics commonly referred to the story as a "feel-good" movie about "hope sprouting where there should be none" (Burr, 2005, par. 1). Clowning and krumping were repeatedly treated as "salvational subcultures" (Harrington, p. WE37) that have "provided young African-Americans-most stranded in the war zones of South Central-a path away from the guns'n'poses of the area's self-styled gangstas and drug lords" (Brunson, 2005).The director, LaChapelle, is an internationally renowned photographer noted for his high-fashion celebrity photographs taken on surreal, extraordinary sets; thus, the film as a visual phenomenon is no surprise. His artwork typically plays with themes of excess aesthetically conveyed by a spectacular use of color and camp. LaChapelle's fantastic, vivid, and bizarre aesthetics are identifiable traits that run across his multi-media vita of music videos, advertisements, fashion, and fine art photography. Regarding his auteur status LaChapelle states, "My pictures are entertainment, an escape from the world we live in today. I never deal with death and violence; they're too everyday" ("High Fashion Fantasies," 1998, p. 54). Applying this statement to Rize poses a number of questions regarding the ethical and social responsibilities of a documentarian; one such question might ask how LaChapelle reconciles his own logic within a film made about the gritty, tough streets of South Central where death and violence for many of the area's constituents are "everyday" phenomena?Although his statement can be read in a number of ways, this paper argues that LaChapelle's own artistic vision ultimately compromises his role as a social documentarian of an inner-city struggle. If documentarians "speak for the interests of others" (Nichols, 2001, p. 3), then a number of ethical issues arise in the act of representing a community of which the storyteller is not a part. Structures of power, for instance, are implicit to the re-presenter/re-presented relationship and complicated by inherent social, cultural, and economic differences of either party (consciously or not). At the same time, it is possible that even highly reflexive modes of filmmaking and film criticism are privy to an essentializing discourse that predetermines a filmmaker's racial and class identity as inextricably at odds with the social actors he or she has represented on film. This research is no exception. Thus, this paper makes no claim to whether or not a white, wealthy, internationally-renowned popular artist is capable of bracketing his own subjective identity to adequately depict the "objective reality" of a black inner-city subculture. Instead, this research reveals through close textual analysis a number of highly structured formal codes that situate LaChapelle within the film despite his physical absence. Further, these codes offer insight to how the filmmaker views himself in relationship not only to the film's social actors, but to black culture as well.The tendency to romanticize black folk culture with "images of the black working class and inner-city dwellers as somehow inoculated from the devastation of their surroundings" is common in filmmaking, according to Johnson (2003, p. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大卫·拉查佩尔的获奖作品中黑人的商品化
2005年,时尚摄影师David LaChapelle发布了Rize,这是一部关于洛杉矶市中心“小丑”和“krump”舞蹈动作的长篇纪录片。有声望的媒体称赞瑞兹奖是“一场庆典”(斯科特,2005年)、壮观的“视觉奇迹”和“意想不到的打击”(特拉弗斯,2005年)。许多受欢迎的影评人称赞瑞兹揭示了洛杉矶中南部的“另一面”,在那里,年轻人用舞蹈艺术“崛起”,摆脱社会困境。最常见的是,这部电影因其振奋人心的信息而获得赞誉。例如,《华盛顿邮报》(Washington Post)的一篇评论指出:“在被贫困、毒品和帮派暴力等多重摧残所困扰的被剥夺公民权的社区,总是有顽强而英勇的艺术回应。”这是最具戏剧性和最鼓舞人心的事件之一”(哈林顿,2005,p. WE37)。为了表达他们的赞赏,评论家们通常把这个故事称为一部“感觉良好”的电影,讲述了“希望在没有希望的地方发芽”(Burr, 2005,第1页)。小丑和krump被反复视为“拯救亚文化”(Harrington,第37页),它们“为年轻的非裔美国人——大多数被滞留在中南部的战区——提供了一条远离该地区自诩为黑帮和毒贩子的枪支和姿势的道路”(Brunson, 2005)。导演拉查佩尔(LaChapelle)是一位国际知名的摄影师,以在超现实、非凡的场景中拍摄高级时装名人照片而闻名;因此,电影作为一种视觉现象是不足为奇的。他的艺术作品通常是通过色彩和阵营的壮观使用来传达过度美学的主题。LaChapelle的梦幻、生动和奇异的美学是他在音乐视频、广告、时尚和美术摄影等多媒体生活中可以识别的特征。关于他的导演身份,拉查佩尔说:“我的电影是娱乐,是对我们今天生活的世界的一种逃避。我从不处理死亡和暴力;它们太日常了”(《高级时装幻想》,1998年,第54页)。把这句话应用到Rize身上,就会提出一些关于纪录片导演的道德和社会责任的问题;其中一个问题可能会问,拉查佩尔是如何在一部关于中南部坚韧不拔、艰苦的街道的电影中调和自己的逻辑的,在那里,死亡和暴力对该地区的许多选民来说是“日常”现象。尽管他的陈述可以通过多种方式解读,但本文认为,拉查佩尔自己的艺术视野最终妥协了他作为一个内城斗争的社会纪录片的角色。如果纪录片“为他人的利益说话”(Nichols, 2001, p. 3),那么在代表一个不属于故事讲述者的社区的行为中,就会出现许多伦理问题。例如,权力结构隐含于再现/再现关系中,并因双方内在的社会、文化和经济差异(有意或无意)而变得复杂。与此同时,即使是高度自反的电影制作和电影评论模式,也有可能受到一种本质化的话语的影响,这种话语预先决定了电影制作人的种族和阶级身份,因为他们与他或她在电影中所代表的社会演员有着不可分割的矛盾。这项研究也不例外。因此,本文并不主张一个富有的、国际知名的白人流行艺术家是否有能力包涵自己的主观身份,以充分描绘黑人市中心亚文化的“客观现实”。相反,这项研究通过仔细的文本分析揭示了一些高度结构化的正式代码,这些代码将拉查佩尔置于电影中,尽管他的身体不在。此外,这些代码提供了洞察电影制作人如何看待自己不仅与电影中的社会演员,而且与黑人文化的关系。根据Johnson (2003, p. ...)的说法,将黑人民间文化浪漫化的趋势在电影制作中很常见,“黑人工人阶级和市中心居民的形象以某种方式从他们周围的破坏中接种了疫苗”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1