Governance of cultural heritage: towards participatory approaches

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3389/ejcmp.2023.v11iss1-article-1
Sakarias Sokka, F. Badia, Anita Kangas, F. Donato
{"title":"Governance of cultural heritage: towards participatory approaches","authors":"Sakarias Sokka, F. Badia, Anita Kangas, F. Donato","doi":"10.3389/ejcmp.2023.v11iss1-article-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes participatory governance in relation to heritage. Based on previous studies on the implementation of participation and theoretical discussions considering the participatory governance of cultural heritage, we found four types of cultural heritage governance, with differing weights with regard to public authorities, civil society, markets, and citizens. Governmental, corporatist, service-led, and co-creative cultural heritage governance types were identified, which reflect the shifts in participatory approaches to governance from state-centered activities to the proliferation of civil society, and from professionally dominated to more citizen-based activities. According to our analysis, culture and heritage can be conceptualized as instruments for the transformation of attributes and competencies, and they work as mediums to cultivate recognition between institutions and citizens. This includes not only seeking consensus in decision making but also respecting the nuances and values of different heritages.","PeriodicalId":40075,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2023.v11iss1-article-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This article analyzes participatory governance in relation to heritage. Based on previous studies on the implementation of participation and theoretical discussions considering the participatory governance of cultural heritage, we found four types of cultural heritage governance, with differing weights with regard to public authorities, civil society, markets, and citizens. Governmental, corporatist, service-led, and co-creative cultural heritage governance types were identified, which reflect the shifts in participatory approaches to governance from state-centered activities to the proliferation of civil society, and from professionally dominated to more citizen-based activities. According to our analysis, culture and heritage can be conceptualized as instruments for the transformation of attributes and competencies, and they work as mediums to cultivate recognition between institutions and citizens. This includes not only seeking consensus in decision making but also respecting the nuances and values of different heritages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化遗产治理:走向参与式方法
本文分析了与遗产相关的参与式治理。基于以往对文化遗产参与式治理实施的研究和理论讨论,我们发现了四种文化遗产治理类型,它们在公共当局、公民社会、市场和公民方面的权重不同。确定了政府、社团主义、服务主导和共同创造的文化遗产治理类型,这些类型反映了参与式治理方式的转变,从以国家为中心的活动到公民社会的扩散,从专业主导的活动到更多以公民为基础的活动。根据我们的分析,文化和遗产可以被概念化为属性和能力转换的工具,它们是培养机构和公民之间认可的媒介。这不仅包括在决策中寻求共识,还包括尊重不同遗产的细微差别和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decolonising cultural policy: the cultural and linguistic rights of the Sámi in Finland Cultural and space-based factors influencing recreational conflicts in forests. The example of cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg (Germany) Value of art and culture institutions: a case study of Jyväskylä, Finland Why is managerial shared leadership in creative organizations a more resilient, transparent, open, and generous constellation? A case analysis approach Management perspectives for ecomuseums effectiveness: a holistic approach to sociocultural development of local areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1