A Passport to Trouble: Bureaucratic Incompetence as Censorship

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2011-09-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.20.2.85
Lane R. Mandlis
{"title":"A Passport to Trouble: Bureaucratic Incompetence as Censorship","authors":"Lane R. Mandlis","doi":"10.3172/JIE.20.2.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAccess to government issued identity documentation (ID) is not readily available for all Canadians. Trans- identified Canadians1 are one particular group that has a significant amount of difficultly accessing ID. The ramifications of the barriers to obtaining ID are significant and far reaching; and for transidentified people, can function as a justification for other forms of exclusion and violence based in transphobia. Transphobia consists of actions, behaviors or beliefs that are driven by an understanding (consciously or not) of the trans-body as less real than the non- trans body (Prosser, 1998). These actions, behaviors and beliefs function as forms of violence, whether explicit or implicit, intentional or otherwise, that are often thought to stem from fear. \"Common sense\" assumptions about gender-that everyone identifies as the sex they were assigned at birth and that norms of masculinity and femininity naturally follow these birth assignments-are used to justify transphobia in the form of stigmatization, discrimination, and various types of violence (Spade, 2008). Thinking about transphobia in this way, it is easy to see that policies that enact barriers to ID access for trans- people are an excellent example of institutional transphobia.Barriers to ID access for trans- people in Canada occur in a myriad of ways, and this article will look specifically at access issues in relation to passports. As trans legal scholar Dean Spade (2008, p. 749) notes: \"the literature has thus far failed to look at the range of administrative gender reclassification policies and practices-including birth certificates, DMV policies, policies of sex- segregated facilities, and federal identity document policies-side by side, which has meant that the significance of the incoherence of these policies as a group has been obscured.\" This article will not go so far as to attempt such a lofty endeavor; however, through an examination of the barriers to information regarding gender reclassification, this article offers a different trajectory towards a similar goal. While the significance of these incoherencies is incredibly important, so too are the erasures of gender reclassification policies that occur through the lack of access to information regarding them, and the impact these erasures have on the interconnected government policies that affect trans- people (such as access to ID, placement in sex- segregated facilities, and access to healthcare). Moreover, these erasures perform a significantly more important function than simply an extension of institutional transphobia; they also function to naturalize and reify \"common sense\" assumptions about gender that underpin both the policies and transphobia, as well as various forms of misogyny.Through a consideration of the relationship between legal discourses and citizenship discourses as they relate to the transsexed body and the passport, this article undermines the commonsensical assumptions that underpin social justice and human rights issues. By explicitly considering how a lack of access to information functions to produce certain bodies as possible and others as impossible, while simultaneously producing different forms of citizenship for these (im)possible bodies, government issued ID becomes the ground from which the horizon of institutional transphobia and the naturalization of gender difference becomes obvious. Exposing this institutionally imbedded transphobia is merely an initial step in the much larger project suggested by Spade, as the significance of the incoherencies between policies is also obscured by the barriers to access of the very information contained in these policies. Moving through a critical and rigorous examination of a single Passport Canada form, this article uses the formal and informal archive produced by this form, ethnographic stories, and the mandate and understanding expressed by Passport Canada to expose the inaccessibility of information regarding gender reclassification. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"85-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.2.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

IntroductionAccess to government issued identity documentation (ID) is not readily available for all Canadians. Trans- identified Canadians1 are one particular group that has a significant amount of difficultly accessing ID. The ramifications of the barriers to obtaining ID are significant and far reaching; and for transidentified people, can function as a justification for other forms of exclusion and violence based in transphobia. Transphobia consists of actions, behaviors or beliefs that are driven by an understanding (consciously or not) of the trans-body as less real than the non- trans body (Prosser, 1998). These actions, behaviors and beliefs function as forms of violence, whether explicit or implicit, intentional or otherwise, that are often thought to stem from fear. "Common sense" assumptions about gender-that everyone identifies as the sex they were assigned at birth and that norms of masculinity and femininity naturally follow these birth assignments-are used to justify transphobia in the form of stigmatization, discrimination, and various types of violence (Spade, 2008). Thinking about transphobia in this way, it is easy to see that policies that enact barriers to ID access for trans- people are an excellent example of institutional transphobia.Barriers to ID access for trans- people in Canada occur in a myriad of ways, and this article will look specifically at access issues in relation to passports. As trans legal scholar Dean Spade (2008, p. 749) notes: "the literature has thus far failed to look at the range of administrative gender reclassification policies and practices-including birth certificates, DMV policies, policies of sex- segregated facilities, and federal identity document policies-side by side, which has meant that the significance of the incoherence of these policies as a group has been obscured." This article will not go so far as to attempt such a lofty endeavor; however, through an examination of the barriers to information regarding gender reclassification, this article offers a different trajectory towards a similar goal. While the significance of these incoherencies is incredibly important, so too are the erasures of gender reclassification policies that occur through the lack of access to information regarding them, and the impact these erasures have on the interconnected government policies that affect trans- people (such as access to ID, placement in sex- segregated facilities, and access to healthcare). Moreover, these erasures perform a significantly more important function than simply an extension of institutional transphobia; they also function to naturalize and reify "common sense" assumptions about gender that underpin both the policies and transphobia, as well as various forms of misogyny.Through a consideration of the relationship between legal discourses and citizenship discourses as they relate to the transsexed body and the passport, this article undermines the commonsensical assumptions that underpin social justice and human rights issues. By explicitly considering how a lack of access to information functions to produce certain bodies as possible and others as impossible, while simultaneously producing different forms of citizenship for these (im)possible bodies, government issued ID becomes the ground from which the horizon of institutional transphobia and the naturalization of gender difference becomes obvious. Exposing this institutionally imbedded transphobia is merely an initial step in the much larger project suggested by Spade, as the significance of the incoherencies between policies is also obscured by the barriers to access of the very information contained in these policies. Moving through a critical and rigorous examination of a single Passport Canada form, this article uses the formal and informal archive produced by this form, ethnographic stories, and the mandate and understanding expressed by Passport Canada to expose the inaccessibility of information regarding gender reclassification. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻烦的通行证:官僚无能的审查制度
并非所有加拿大人都能轻易获得政府颁发的身份证件。变性身份的加拿大人是一个特殊的群体,他们的身份证件很难获取。获得身份证的障碍的后果是重大和深远的;对于变性人来说,这可以作为其他形式的排斥和基于变性恐惧症的暴力的理由。跨性别恐惧症是由一种理解(有意识或无意识地)驱动的行动、行为或信仰,这种理解认为跨性别者比非跨性别者更不真实(Prosser, 1998)。这些行动、行为和信仰都是暴力的形式,无论是显性的还是隐性的,有意的还是无意的,通常被认为是源于恐惧。关于性别的“常识”假设——每个人都认同他们出生时被分配的性别,男性和女性气质的规范自然遵循这些出生分配——被用来证明变性恐惧症的正当性,其形式是污名化、歧视和各种类型的暴力(Spade, 2008)。以这种方式思考跨性别恐惧症,很容易看出,为跨性别者制定身份获取障碍的政策是制度性跨性别恐惧症的一个很好的例子。在加拿大,跨性别者获得身份证的障碍有很多,这篇文章将特别关注与护照有关的访问问题。正如跨性别法律学者Dean Spade(2008,第749页)所指出的那样:“迄今为止,文献未能将行政性别重新分类政策和实践的范围——包括出生证明、DMV政策、性别隔离设施政策和联邦身份证件政策——并排看待,这意味着这些政策作为一个群体的不一致性的重要性被掩盖了。”本文并不打算做这样崇高的尝试;然而,通过对有关性别重新分类的信息障碍的检查,本文提供了实现类似目标的不同轨迹。虽然这些不一致性的重要性非常重要,但由于缺乏相关信息而出现的性别重新分类政策的删除,以及这些删除对影响跨性别者的相互关联的政府政策的影响(例如获得身份证,在性别隔离设施的安置,以及获得医疗保健)也同样重要。此外,这些消除的作用远比制度性跨性别恐惧症的延伸重要得多;它们还起着自然化和具体化关于性别的“常识性”假设的作用,这些假设支撑着政策和跨性别恐惧症,以及各种形式的厌女症。通过对涉及变性身体和护照的法律话语和公民话语之间关系的考虑,本文破坏了支撑社会正义和人权问题的常识性假设。通过明确考虑信息获取的缺乏如何使某些主体成为可能,而另一些主体成为不可能,同时为这些(不)可能的主体产生不同形式的公民身份,政府颁发的身份证成为制度性跨性别恐惧症和性别差异自然化的基础。揭露这种制度上根深蒂固的跨性别恐惧症仅仅是Spade提出的更大项目的第一步,因为政策之间不连贯的重要性也被这些政策中包含的信息的获取障碍所掩盖。本文通过对单一加拿大护照表格的批判性和严格检查,使用该表格产生的正式和非正式档案,民族志故事以及加拿大护照所表达的授权和理解来揭示有关性别重新分类的信息的不可访问性。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1