Computer Ethics as a Field of Applied Ethics: Core Questions and Future Directions

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.21.2.52
H. Tavani
{"title":"Computer Ethics as a Field of Applied Ethics: Core Questions and Future Directions","authors":"H. Tavani","doi":"10.3172/JIE.21.2.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live.-Socrates (in Plato's Republic, Book 1:352d)Ethics is serious, and very difficult.... [It] is about human beings ... in the human pursuit of ... a standard of right conduct or virtue.-Lisa H. Newton (1989, pp. 254-55)When Dean Evangelos Hadjimichael and Professor David Schmidt invited me to speak at a national conference at Fairfield University celebrating the distinguished career of Lisa Newton, I felt both honored and intimidated. I was honored to be included among the presenters at a conference devoted to Professor Newton-an esteemed scholar whose groundbreaking work in applied ethics, which is widely recognized and respected both within and outside of the academic community, has inspired and informed my research in two areas: computer ethics and public health ethics. However, I must admit that I also felt intimidated when I learned that the list of invited conference speakers included some legendary figures in the field of applied ethics. I also worried that because my talk would focus on a topic in computer ethics-a field that is less mature, less established, and thus possibly less understood than other fields in applied ethics-it was quite possible that key elements in my presentation might be unfamiliar to many in an audience whose interests in applied ethics spanned a wide range of academic disciplines. Despite my concerns, however, I humbly accepted the invitation to speak; the present essay is a revised version of my conference presentation.1. Introduction and OverviewBecause the theme of the conference honoring Professor Newton was on \"directions in the disciplines (of applied ethics) today,\" I tried to tailor my presentation accordingly-by describing the current state of the field of computer ethics (CE) and also hinting at some likely directions for its future. However, if Shakespeare's point that the \"past is prologue\" to the future (Tempest, Act II, Scene 1) is accurate, I thought that at least some mention of important developments in the history of CE would seem warranted. So, I begin my essay (as I did my presentation) with a brief overview of some milestones in the development of CE as a field of applied ethics. This discussion is followed by a brief description of the ongoing debate about the proper scope of CE, as a subfield both in applied ethics and computer science. Next, I describe, in fairly broadbrush strokes, the debate about whether CE qualifies as a legitimate field in applied ethics, as well as the corollary question of whether any CE issues are unique ethical issues.Before briefly considering some specific examples of recent CE and CErelated controversies, I identify a cluster of issues that CE scholars and practitioners have generally considered to be the standard or \"mainstream\" issues comprising the field. I then examine and reject the claim that CE will eventually \"disappear\" as a separate field of applied ethics. Finally, I project some likely directions for CE in the near future, and I conclude with a list of theoretical and practical questions that I believe will need to be addressed by CE researchers and practitioners.12. The Development of CE as a Field of Applied EthicsA reasonable case can be made for the claim that CE, as a distinct field in applied ethics, emerged gradually during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Some, however, trace the origin of the field to the work of Norbert Wiener, whose insights in his writings in the late 1940s and early 1950s anticipated some contemporary concerns regarding the social and ethical implications of \"cybernetic\" related technologies.2 Others, who suggest that Joseph Weizenbaum may have been the first author to be instrumental in shaping the field, point to questions Weizenbaum raised about the potential misuses of computer technology in his influential book, Computer Power and Human Reason (1976).3 Bynum (2008) notes that Walter Maner claims to have coined the phrase \"computer ethics\" in 1978. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"21 1","pages":"52-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.2.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live.-Socrates (in Plato's Republic, Book 1:352d)Ethics is serious, and very difficult.... [It] is about human beings ... in the human pursuit of ... a standard of right conduct or virtue.-Lisa H. Newton (1989, pp. 254-55)When Dean Evangelos Hadjimichael and Professor David Schmidt invited me to speak at a national conference at Fairfield University celebrating the distinguished career of Lisa Newton, I felt both honored and intimidated. I was honored to be included among the presenters at a conference devoted to Professor Newton-an esteemed scholar whose groundbreaking work in applied ethics, which is widely recognized and respected both within and outside of the academic community, has inspired and informed my research in two areas: computer ethics and public health ethics. However, I must admit that I also felt intimidated when I learned that the list of invited conference speakers included some legendary figures in the field of applied ethics. I also worried that because my talk would focus on a topic in computer ethics-a field that is less mature, less established, and thus possibly less understood than other fields in applied ethics-it was quite possible that key elements in my presentation might be unfamiliar to many in an audience whose interests in applied ethics spanned a wide range of academic disciplines. Despite my concerns, however, I humbly accepted the invitation to speak; the present essay is a revised version of my conference presentation.1. Introduction and OverviewBecause the theme of the conference honoring Professor Newton was on "directions in the disciplines (of applied ethics) today," I tried to tailor my presentation accordingly-by describing the current state of the field of computer ethics (CE) and also hinting at some likely directions for its future. However, if Shakespeare's point that the "past is prologue" to the future (Tempest, Act II, Scene 1) is accurate, I thought that at least some mention of important developments in the history of CE would seem warranted. So, I begin my essay (as I did my presentation) with a brief overview of some milestones in the development of CE as a field of applied ethics. This discussion is followed by a brief description of the ongoing debate about the proper scope of CE, as a subfield both in applied ethics and computer science. Next, I describe, in fairly broadbrush strokes, the debate about whether CE qualifies as a legitimate field in applied ethics, as well as the corollary question of whether any CE issues are unique ethical issues.Before briefly considering some specific examples of recent CE and CErelated controversies, I identify a cluster of issues that CE scholars and practitioners have generally considered to be the standard or "mainstream" issues comprising the field. I then examine and reject the claim that CE will eventually "disappear" as a separate field of applied ethics. Finally, I project some likely directions for CE in the near future, and I conclude with a list of theoretical and practical questions that I believe will need to be addressed by CE researchers and practitioners.12. The Development of CE as a Field of Applied EthicsA reasonable case can be made for the claim that CE, as a distinct field in applied ethics, emerged gradually during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Some, however, trace the origin of the field to the work of Norbert Wiener, whose insights in his writings in the late 1940s and early 1950s anticipated some contemporary concerns regarding the social and ethical implications of "cybernetic" related technologies.2 Others, who suggest that Joseph Weizenbaum may have been the first author to be instrumental in shaping the field, point to questions Weizenbaum raised about the potential misuses of computer technology in his influential book, Computer Power and Human Reason (1976).3 Bynum (2008) notes that Walter Maner claims to have coined the phrase "computer ethics" in 1978. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机伦理学作为应用伦理学的一个领域:核心问题与未来方向
我们讨论的不是小事,而是我们应该怎样生活。——苏格拉底(柏拉图《理想国》1:352d)伦理是严肃的,而且很难....(它)是关于人类的……在人类对……标准:正确行为或美德的标准当院长Evangelos hadjimmichael和David Schmidt教授邀请我在费尔菲尔德大学举行的庆祝Lisa Newton杰出职业生涯的全国会议上发言时,我感到既荣幸又害怕。我很荣幸能在一个专门讨论牛顿教授的会议上发表演讲,牛顿教授是一位受人尊敬的学者,他在应用伦理学方面的开创性工作在学术界内外都得到了广泛的认可和尊重,启发并指导了我在两个领域的研究:计算机伦理学和公共卫生伦理学。然而,我必须承认,当我得知邀请的会议演讲者名单中包括一些应用伦理学领域的传奇人物时,我也感到害怕。我还担心,因为我的演讲将集中在计算机伦理学的一个主题上——这是一个不太成熟、不太成熟的领域,因此可能比应用伦理学的其他领域更不容易理解——我的演讲中的关键元素很可能对许多对应用伦理学感兴趣的听众来说是不熟悉的,他们对应用伦理学的兴趣跨越了广泛的学科。然而,尽管我很担心,我还是谦卑地接受了演讲的邀请;这篇文章是我的会议报告的修订版。由于表彰牛顿教授的会议的主题是“今天(应用伦理学)学科的方向”,我试图相应地调整我的演讲——通过描述计算机伦理学(CE)领域的现状,并暗示其未来的一些可能的方向。然而,如果莎士比亚关于“过去是未来的序幕”(《暴风雨》第二幕第一场)的观点是正确的,我认为至少有一些关于公元历史上重要发展的提及是有道理的。因此,我开始我的文章(就像我做我的演讲一样),简要概述了CE作为应用伦理学领域发展中的一些里程碑。本讨论之后是对作为应用伦理学和计算机科学的子领域的CE的适当范围的持续辩论的简要描述。接下来,我以相当粗略的笔触描述了关于CE是否有资格作为应用伦理学的一个合法领域的辩论,以及是否任何CE问题都是独特的伦理问题的必然问题。在简要考虑最近CE和相关争议的一些具体例子之前,我确定了CE学者和从业者通常认为是构成该领域的标准或“主流”问题的一系列问题。然后,我检查并拒绝了CE最终将作为一个独立的应用伦理学领域“消失”的说法。最后,我预测了一些可能的方向,在不久的将来,我总结了一系列理论和实践问题,我认为这些问题需要由CE研究人员和实践者来解决。作为应用伦理学的一个独特领域,在20世纪70年代末和80年代初,我们有理由认为,作为应用伦理学的一个独特领域,应用伦理学在20世纪70年代末和80年代初逐渐兴起。然而,一些人将该领域的起源追溯到诺伯特·维纳(Norbert Wiener)的工作,他在20世纪40年代末和50年代初的著作中提出了一些关于“控制论”相关技术的社会和伦理含义的当代关注还有一些人认为,约瑟夫·魏岑鲍姆可能是第一个在塑造该领域方面发挥重要作用的作者,他们指出,魏岑鲍姆在其颇具影响力的著作《计算机能力与人类理性》(1976)中提出了一些关于计算机技术可能被滥用的问题Bynum(2008)注意到Walter Maner声称在1978年创造了“计算机伦理”这个词。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1