What Happened to Politics and Ethics? Seven 21st Century Library Philosophers on the Epistemological and Ontological Foundations of Library Science

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2013-04-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.22.1.80
D. Bade
{"title":"What Happened to Politics and Ethics? Seven 21st Century Library Philosophers on the Epistemological and Ontological Foundations of Library Science","authors":"D. Bade","doi":"10.3172/JIE.22.1.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Philosophy in the Library: A Healthy Debate or a State of Confusion?Lately there seems to be considerable debate-or confusion, depending on how you understand it-as to what libraries are, what is the proper object of study for library science, and even whether or not library science is really scientific. Enter the philosophers, and who knew there were so many among us! Although Zwadlo (1997) cited a 1934 paper by Danton in which it was reported that only 1 to 5 percent of library publications have any philosophical discussion, the debate about philosophy for libraries renewed in the 1990s, and Danton would be astonished at the number of publications appearing since the year 2000. One of the most noticeable aspects of this renewed interest is a focus on epistemological and ontological issues, a focus that can be traced back to a series of papers published in Library Quarterly in the 1990s (see Radford [1992], Budd [1995], Zwadlo [1997] and Dick [1999]). That was largely an AngloAmerican academic debate (Dick writing in English from South Africa). The task I set myself in this paper was to look at the debate during the past decade, and especially to consider views from beyond the Anglo-American universe. I chose seven books to examine, looking at them in particular for the political and ethical dimensions of the discussion.2. The Library: A Radically Political InstitutionI shall begin with Serbian librarian Zeljko Vuckovic's 2003 monograph Javne biblioteke i javno znanje (which could be translated in English as Public libraries and public knowledge). Like the other authors discussed below, he focuses on epistemological issues; more than any of the others he is concerned with the potential of libraries for political life. The hypothesis the author wishes to explore is the following:Public libraries are the most open and most democratic form of the institutionalization and use of public knowledge. Hence their key role in designing and building a library information system and infrastructure and their strategic importance in economic and social development. Providing free, equal and unrestricted access to the achievements of culture and civilization, to knowledge, ideas and information, the public library contributes to the development of a democratic public and the quality of life in the community, and the practical realization of the concept of rational communication [Vuckovic, 2003, p. 7].Jesse Shera's social epistemology is a guiding theoretical-methodological orientation in the first half of this work as the author proceeds through a discussion of terminology and chapters on the function of the library, public librarianship as a social institution, the development of the idea of public librarianship, and the legal foundations and history of public libraries in Serbia. The second half of the book looks at public librarianship in the context of international legal regimes, UNESCO declarations and IFLA, the public library as part of postmodern culture and the changes and challenges of public libraries in the information society with its digital libraries. A short chapter on the development of technical information systems for public libraries in Serbia is then followed by an even shorter chapter on the philosophical and axiological principles of public librarianship. It is those few final pages that are chiefly of interest to me, since the discussion within the book assumes these principles rather than argues them.The final chapter begins with the question \"Why philosophical considerations in an area that is primarily practical and pragmatic, in a service- and client-oriented activity?\" (p. 174). It is a question that nearly every one of the authors discussed below asks. The answer, he suggests, depends on the definition of philosophical inquiry but even more importantly on whether one thinks that librarianship needs a systematic theoretical foundation. In the author's view, systematic theory \"is an indication and measure of professional responsibility . …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"80-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.22.1.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

1. Philosophy in the Library: A Healthy Debate or a State of Confusion?Lately there seems to be considerable debate-or confusion, depending on how you understand it-as to what libraries are, what is the proper object of study for library science, and even whether or not library science is really scientific. Enter the philosophers, and who knew there were so many among us! Although Zwadlo (1997) cited a 1934 paper by Danton in which it was reported that only 1 to 5 percent of library publications have any philosophical discussion, the debate about philosophy for libraries renewed in the 1990s, and Danton would be astonished at the number of publications appearing since the year 2000. One of the most noticeable aspects of this renewed interest is a focus on epistemological and ontological issues, a focus that can be traced back to a series of papers published in Library Quarterly in the 1990s (see Radford [1992], Budd [1995], Zwadlo [1997] and Dick [1999]). That was largely an AngloAmerican academic debate (Dick writing in English from South Africa). The task I set myself in this paper was to look at the debate during the past decade, and especially to consider views from beyond the Anglo-American universe. I chose seven books to examine, looking at them in particular for the political and ethical dimensions of the discussion.2. The Library: A Radically Political InstitutionI shall begin with Serbian librarian Zeljko Vuckovic's 2003 monograph Javne biblioteke i javno znanje (which could be translated in English as Public libraries and public knowledge). Like the other authors discussed below, he focuses on epistemological issues; more than any of the others he is concerned with the potential of libraries for political life. The hypothesis the author wishes to explore is the following:Public libraries are the most open and most democratic form of the institutionalization and use of public knowledge. Hence their key role in designing and building a library information system and infrastructure and their strategic importance in economic and social development. Providing free, equal and unrestricted access to the achievements of culture and civilization, to knowledge, ideas and information, the public library contributes to the development of a democratic public and the quality of life in the community, and the practical realization of the concept of rational communication [Vuckovic, 2003, p. 7].Jesse Shera's social epistemology is a guiding theoretical-methodological orientation in the first half of this work as the author proceeds through a discussion of terminology and chapters on the function of the library, public librarianship as a social institution, the development of the idea of public librarianship, and the legal foundations and history of public libraries in Serbia. The second half of the book looks at public librarianship in the context of international legal regimes, UNESCO declarations and IFLA, the public library as part of postmodern culture and the changes and challenges of public libraries in the information society with its digital libraries. A short chapter on the development of technical information systems for public libraries in Serbia is then followed by an even shorter chapter on the philosophical and axiological principles of public librarianship. It is those few final pages that are chiefly of interest to me, since the discussion within the book assumes these principles rather than argues them.The final chapter begins with the question "Why philosophical considerations in an area that is primarily practical and pragmatic, in a service- and client-oriented activity?" (p. 174). It is a question that nearly every one of the authors discussed below asks. The answer, he suggests, depends on the definition of philosophical inquiry but even more importantly on whether one thinks that librarianship needs a systematic theoretical foundation. In the author's view, systematic theory "is an indication and measure of professional responsibility . …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治和伦理怎么了?7位21世纪图书馆哲学家论图书馆学的认识论与本体论基础
1. 图书馆哲学:健康的辩论还是混乱的状态?最近,关于图书馆是什么,图书馆学的适当研究对象是什么,甚至图书馆学是否真的是科学,似乎有相当多的争论或困惑,这取决于你如何理解它。哲学家们进来了,谁知道我们中间有这么多人呢!虽然Zwadlo(1997)引用了丹东1934年的一篇论文,其中报道说只有1%到5%的图书馆出版物进行了哲学讨论,但关于图书馆哲学的争论在20世纪90年代重新开始,丹东会对2000年以来出现的出版物数量感到惊讶。这种新兴趣最引人注目的方面之一是对认识论和本体论问题的关注,这一关注可以追溯到20世纪90年代在《图书馆季刊》上发表的一系列论文(见Radford [1992], Budd [1995], Zwadlo[1997]和Dick[1999])。这在很大程度上是一场英美学术辩论(迪克在南非用英语写作)。我在这篇论文中给自己设定的任务是审视过去十年的辩论,尤其是考虑来自英美世界以外的观点。我选择了七本书来研究,特别是从政治和伦理的角度来讨论。图书馆:一个激进的政治机构我将从塞尔维亚图书管理员Zeljko Vuckovic 2003年的专著Javne biblioteke i javno znanje(英文可以翻译为公共图书馆和公共知识)开始。像下面讨论的其他作者一样,他关注认识论问题;他比其他任何人都更关心图书馆在政治生活中的潜力。笔者希望探讨的假设是:公共图书馆是公共知识制度化和使用的最开放、最民主的形式。因此,他们在设计和建设图书馆信息系统和基础设施方面具有关键作用,在经济和社会发展中具有重要的战略意义。公共图书馆提供免费、平等和不受限制地获取文化和文明成果,获取知识、思想和信息,有助于民主公众和社区生活质量的发展,有助于理性沟通概念的实际实现[Vuckovic, 2003,第7页]。杰西·谢拉的社会认识论是本书前半部分的理论方法论指导方向,作者通过对图书馆功能的术语和章节的讨论,公共图书馆作为一种社会机构,公共图书馆理念的发展,以及塞尔维亚公共图书馆的法律基础和历史。本书的后半部分着眼于国际法律制度、联合国教科文组织宣言和国际图联背景下的公共图书馆事业、作为后现代文化一部分的公共图书馆以及信息社会中公共图书馆的变化和挑战。在关于塞尔维亚公共图书馆技术信息系统发展的简短一章之后,还有关于公共图书馆事业的哲学和价值论原则的更短一章。我最感兴趣的是最后那几页,因为书中讨论的是假设这些原则,而不是争论它们。最后一章以这样一个问题开始:“为什么在一个以服务和客户为导向的活动中,在一个主要是实用和务实的领域中要考虑哲学?”(p。174)。这是一个几乎每个作者都会问的问题。他认为,答案取决于哲学探究的定义,但更重要的是取决于人们是否认为图书馆事业需要一个系统的理论基础。笔者认为,“系统理论”是职业责任的标志和衡量标准。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1