Academic Dishonesty: A Comparative Study of Students of Library and Information Science in Botswana and Zambia

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2013-09-01 DOI:10.3172/JIE.22.2.137
A. Akakandelwa, P. Jain, Sitali Wamundila
{"title":"Academic Dishonesty: A Comparative Study of Students of Library and Information Science in Botswana and Zambia","authors":"A. Akakandelwa, P. Jain, Sitali Wamundila","doi":"10.3172/JIE.22.2.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAcademic dishonesty is an issue of concern world-wide. In universities it has become a stumbling block in genuine research activity, crippling talent and the potential of students who are future leaders in every field. The advent of the Internet has made it easier for students to indulge in dishonest practices. As Young (2001) has pointed out, \"in recent years, professors have been frustrated by the way more and more students use the Internet to cheat-by plagiarizing the work of other students, by copying material from online reference works, by buying term papers from online paper-writing companies, and by other means.\" On the other hand, college and university libraries' records show a bleak picture of borrowing books by the students for their studies and research work. This is an indication that most students depend on web-based information. While this in itself may not indicate that such information is being used unethically, it does point out an enhanced potential for doing so.\"Academic dishonesty consists of any deliberate attempt to falsify, fabricate or otherwise tamper with data, information, records, or any other material that is relevant to the student's participation in any course, laboratory, or other academic exercise or function\" (Delta College, 1999). The Delta College definition further explained that academic dishonesty includes acts of cheating or other forms of academic dishonesty that are intended to gain unfair academic advantage. This includes plagiarism, which is deliberately presenting work, words, ideas, theories, etc., derived in whole or in part from a source external to the student as though they are the student's own efforts. Other academic misconduct includes falsifying or fabricating data, records, or any information relevant to the student's participation in any course or academic exercise, or tampering with such information as collected or distributed by the faculty member. On a similar note, Loyola Marymount University (2012) provides some examples of academic dishonesty, such as cheating and facilitating cheating, plagiarism, falsification of data, unauthorized access to computers or privileged information, improper use of Internet sites and resources, and improper use of non-print media. These various types of academic dishonesty show the complexity of the issue. It is important to understand the complexity and difficulty in order to find effective ways to resolve or minimize dishonesty.To deal with this problem a number of universities have introduced policies and procedures. For instance, University of Botswana's (UB) basic goal is to foster a learning environment that helps students to grow personally and professionally, and to attain academic excellence. UB expects all its students to uphold the highest personal and academic standards of honesty and integrity. A task group on academic dishonesty among UB Students was set up by the Deputy Vice Chancellor's office in March 2005. Consequently, UB had introduced an academic honesty policy for students. Through this policy UB seeks to promote the highest standards of academic honesty and integrity for all students and to enforce these standards by means of fair, objective, and expeditious procedures (Revised Academic Honesty Policy for Students, 2007).There have been numerous reports, both formal and informal, of the high incidence of academic dishonesty among higher education students. The general perception is that this problem is endemic in universities worldwide and some believe it is increasing (Schemo, 2001). Anecdotal and reported evidence indicates that there are many ways in which students cheat, and the now widespread use of the Internet in universities offers yet another avenue for students inclined to this type of behavior (Szego, 2000).Within the universities under study, many lecturers have informally raised concerns about the increasing incidence of academic dishonesty among students. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"141-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.22.2.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

IntroductionAcademic dishonesty is an issue of concern world-wide. In universities it has become a stumbling block in genuine research activity, crippling talent and the potential of students who are future leaders in every field. The advent of the Internet has made it easier for students to indulge in dishonest practices. As Young (2001) has pointed out, "in recent years, professors have been frustrated by the way more and more students use the Internet to cheat-by plagiarizing the work of other students, by copying material from online reference works, by buying term papers from online paper-writing companies, and by other means." On the other hand, college and university libraries' records show a bleak picture of borrowing books by the students for their studies and research work. This is an indication that most students depend on web-based information. While this in itself may not indicate that such information is being used unethically, it does point out an enhanced potential for doing so."Academic dishonesty consists of any deliberate attempt to falsify, fabricate or otherwise tamper with data, information, records, or any other material that is relevant to the student's participation in any course, laboratory, or other academic exercise or function" (Delta College, 1999). The Delta College definition further explained that academic dishonesty includes acts of cheating or other forms of academic dishonesty that are intended to gain unfair academic advantage. This includes plagiarism, which is deliberately presenting work, words, ideas, theories, etc., derived in whole or in part from a source external to the student as though they are the student's own efforts. Other academic misconduct includes falsifying or fabricating data, records, or any information relevant to the student's participation in any course or academic exercise, or tampering with such information as collected or distributed by the faculty member. On a similar note, Loyola Marymount University (2012) provides some examples of academic dishonesty, such as cheating and facilitating cheating, plagiarism, falsification of data, unauthorized access to computers or privileged information, improper use of Internet sites and resources, and improper use of non-print media. These various types of academic dishonesty show the complexity of the issue. It is important to understand the complexity and difficulty in order to find effective ways to resolve or minimize dishonesty.To deal with this problem a number of universities have introduced policies and procedures. For instance, University of Botswana's (UB) basic goal is to foster a learning environment that helps students to grow personally and professionally, and to attain academic excellence. UB expects all its students to uphold the highest personal and academic standards of honesty and integrity. A task group on academic dishonesty among UB Students was set up by the Deputy Vice Chancellor's office in March 2005. Consequently, UB had introduced an academic honesty policy for students. Through this policy UB seeks to promote the highest standards of academic honesty and integrity for all students and to enforce these standards by means of fair, objective, and expeditious procedures (Revised Academic Honesty Policy for Students, 2007).There have been numerous reports, both formal and informal, of the high incidence of academic dishonesty among higher education students. The general perception is that this problem is endemic in universities worldwide and some believe it is increasing (Schemo, 2001). Anecdotal and reported evidence indicates that there are many ways in which students cheat, and the now widespread use of the Internet in universities offers yet another avenue for students inclined to this type of behavior (Szego, 2000).Within the universities under study, many lecturers have informally raised concerns about the increasing incidence of academic dishonesty among students. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术不诚信:博茨瓦纳和赞比亚图书馆情报学专业学生的比较研究
学术不诚实是一个全世界都关注的问题。在大学里,它已经成为真正的研究活动的绊脚石,削弱了学生的才能和潜力,而这些学生是未来各个领域的领导者。互联网的出现使学生更容易沉迷于不诚实的行为。正如Young(2001)所指出的,“近年来,教授们对越来越多的学生利用互联网作弊的方式感到沮丧——通过抄袭其他学生的作品,从在线参考资料中复制材料,从在线论文写作公司购买学期论文,以及其他方式。”另一方面,高校图书馆的记录显示了学生借书学习和研究工作的惨淡景象。这表明大多数学生依赖网络信息。虽然这本身可能并不表明这些信息正在被不道德地使用,但它确实指出了这样做的可能性增加。“学术不诚实包括任何故意伪造、编造或以其他方式篡改数据、信息、记录或与学生参与任何课程、实验室或其他学术活动或功能相关的任何其他材料的行为”(德尔塔学院,1999)。德尔塔学院的定义进一步解释了学术不诚实包括旨在获得不公平学术优势的作弊或其他形式的学术不诚实行为。这包括抄袭,这是故意呈现的工作,文字,思想,理论等,全部或部分来自外部来源的学生,好像他们是自己的努力。其他学术不端行为包括伪造或伪造与学生参与任何课程或学术活动有关的数据、记录或任何信息,或篡改教师收集或分发的信息。同样,洛约拉玛丽蒙特大学(2012)提供了一些学术不诚实的例子,如作弊和促进作弊,抄袭,伪造数据,未经授权访问计算机或特权信息,不当使用互联网网站和资源,以及不当使用非印刷媒体。这些不同类型的学术不诚实表明了这个问题的复杂性。为了找到解决或减少不诚实的有效方法,了解其复杂性和难度是很重要的。为了解决这个问题,一些大学已经出台了政策和程序。例如,博茨瓦纳大学(UB)的基本目标是营造一个学习环境,帮助学生在个人和专业方面成长,并取得学术成就。布法罗大学希望所有学生都能坚持诚实和正直的最高个人和学术标准。2005年3月,副校长办公室成立了一个研究布法罗大学学生学术不诚信问题的工作小组。因此,UB为学生制定了学术诚信政策。通过这一政策,UB寻求促进所有学生学术诚信和诚信的最高标准,并通过公平,客观和快速的程序来执行这些标准(修订的学生学术诚信政策,2007年)。有大量的报告,无论是正式的还是非正式的,都表明高等教育学生中学术不诚实的发生率很高。普遍的看法是,这个问题在世界各地的大学中是地方性的,有些人认为它正在增加(Schemo, 2001)。传闻和报道的证据表明,学生作弊的方式有很多,现在互联网在大学的广泛使用为倾向于这种行为的学生提供了另一种途径(Szego, 2000)。在所研究的大学中,许多讲师非正式地对学生中越来越多的学术不诚实行为表示担忧。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1