The Paradox of North Korea's Ideological Radicalism: Shaky Social Basis of Strengthening Ideological Campaigns

Q1 Arts and Humanities North Korean Review Pub Date : 2009-04-01 DOI:10.3172/NKR.5.1.46
Aierie Lee, Hyun-Chool Lee, Ji-Yong Lee, Il-gi Kim
{"title":"The Paradox of North Korea's Ideological Radicalism: Shaky Social Basis of Strengthening Ideological Campaigns","authors":"Aierie Lee, Hyun-Chool Lee, Ji-Yong Lee, Il-gi Kim","doi":"10.3172/NKR.5.1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionNorth Korea, the most isolated state in the world, regards itself as a \"socialist dynasty\" and embraces a unique ruling ideology. The North defines itself as a Kim Il-Sung nation: the leader is worshipped as a deity and political power has been passed from the regime's founding leader (Kim Il-Sung) to his son (Kim Jong-Il). The political leader has absolute power over the entire society.Events that occur in the country often make no sense to outsiders. Indeed, North Korea's policies often seem hopelessly backward. Nevertheless, the regime has persisted, even under the devastating economic crisis of the 1990s.What, then, is actually happening in North Korea? Can the regime continue to survive in the future? Although it is difficult to evaluate the country's internal dynamics, due mainly to a lack of accurate information, this paper will show that signs of potential change have emerged within the Pyongyang regime. In particular, we will examine a seemingly paradoxical link between ideological change, stepped-up propaganda campaigns, and the shaky social foundation of state-society relations.Contemporary North Korea may be characterized ideologically as a social institutionalization of Juche ideology, which then shifted to the far-right Songun Jungchi (Military-first politics) and Kangsong Daekook (Strong and Prosperous State). Politically, it relies on a single stratum of leadership and rigid social management and control. The Juche ideology launched by Kim Il-Sung has long penetrated into every aspect of North Korean life, primarily via the bombardment of propaganda campaigns. The ideology has further radicalized into militarism during Kim Jong-Il's era, driving the country into a retrogressed garrison state.North Korea is a totalitarian state that intervenes and exerts control down to the family unit. There is no room for freedom or openness in the society. Despite the North's recent attempt to revamp its economy, a series of economic development plans have failed to achieve their goals.When comparing the Kim Jong-Il regime with that of his father, the main differences involve the ruling ideology and state-society relations. This paper focuses on the relationship between the ideological radicalization of the regime under Kim Jong-Il and the weakening of the regime's legitimacy. To put it differently, we are inter- ested in examining a puzzle: Specifically, why has this ideological radicalization, designed to bolster popular support for the leader and his policies, ironically weakened Kim's political legitimacy?North Korea had built a unique nation-state, separate from the former Soviet bloc and founded on its own ruling ideology. The North distanced itself from other socialist regimes during the collapse of the Soviet Union by focusing on the strength of that ideology. However, signs of a crumbling regime are emerging, with the weakening of ideology towards the garrison state and the far-right nationalism, on one hand, and the failure of the regime's ability to provide goods to its people, on the other.North Korea's Ruling Ideology and Its MetamorphosisThe polity of North Korea is based on Juche ideology. The origin of Juche doctrine is historically associated with the consolidation of Kim Il-Sung's regime. Since the Kim Il-Sung era, the Juche doctrine has become deeply institutionalized, has exerted a very distinctive form of influence on society, and has pervaded every level of North Korean life. Thus, to understand the country's behavior, Juche ideology must be elaborated in detail.The Juche idea emerged as a reaction to external and internal ideological disputes surrounding the Soviet Union and China, particularly the de-Stalinization of the Soviet Union after Stalin's death. Kim Il-Sung rejected de-Stalinization, mainly because his own ideological rhetoric and, thus, political legitimacy, were based on Stalinism. Meanwhile, North Korea increased its autonomy from Chinese intervention and Chinese influence on its domestic politics. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.5.1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IntroductionNorth Korea, the most isolated state in the world, regards itself as a "socialist dynasty" and embraces a unique ruling ideology. The North defines itself as a Kim Il-Sung nation: the leader is worshipped as a deity and political power has been passed from the regime's founding leader (Kim Il-Sung) to his son (Kim Jong-Il). The political leader has absolute power over the entire society.Events that occur in the country often make no sense to outsiders. Indeed, North Korea's policies often seem hopelessly backward. Nevertheless, the regime has persisted, even under the devastating economic crisis of the 1990s.What, then, is actually happening in North Korea? Can the regime continue to survive in the future? Although it is difficult to evaluate the country's internal dynamics, due mainly to a lack of accurate information, this paper will show that signs of potential change have emerged within the Pyongyang regime. In particular, we will examine a seemingly paradoxical link between ideological change, stepped-up propaganda campaigns, and the shaky social foundation of state-society relations.Contemporary North Korea may be characterized ideologically as a social institutionalization of Juche ideology, which then shifted to the far-right Songun Jungchi (Military-first politics) and Kangsong Daekook (Strong and Prosperous State). Politically, it relies on a single stratum of leadership and rigid social management and control. The Juche ideology launched by Kim Il-Sung has long penetrated into every aspect of North Korean life, primarily via the bombardment of propaganda campaigns. The ideology has further radicalized into militarism during Kim Jong-Il's era, driving the country into a retrogressed garrison state.North Korea is a totalitarian state that intervenes and exerts control down to the family unit. There is no room for freedom or openness in the society. Despite the North's recent attempt to revamp its economy, a series of economic development plans have failed to achieve their goals.When comparing the Kim Jong-Il regime with that of his father, the main differences involve the ruling ideology and state-society relations. This paper focuses on the relationship between the ideological radicalization of the regime under Kim Jong-Il and the weakening of the regime's legitimacy. To put it differently, we are inter- ested in examining a puzzle: Specifically, why has this ideological radicalization, designed to bolster popular support for the leader and his policies, ironically weakened Kim's political legitimacy?North Korea had built a unique nation-state, separate from the former Soviet bloc and founded on its own ruling ideology. The North distanced itself from other socialist regimes during the collapse of the Soviet Union by focusing on the strength of that ideology. However, signs of a crumbling regime are emerging, with the weakening of ideology towards the garrison state and the far-right nationalism, on one hand, and the failure of the regime's ability to provide goods to its people, on the other.North Korea's Ruling Ideology and Its MetamorphosisThe polity of North Korea is based on Juche ideology. The origin of Juche doctrine is historically associated with the consolidation of Kim Il-Sung's regime. Since the Kim Il-Sung era, the Juche doctrine has become deeply institutionalized, has exerted a very distinctive form of influence on society, and has pervaded every level of North Korean life. Thus, to understand the country's behavior, Juche ideology must be elaborated in detail.The Juche idea emerged as a reaction to external and internal ideological disputes surrounding the Soviet Union and China, particularly the de-Stalinization of the Soviet Union after Stalin's death. Kim Il-Sung rejected de-Stalinization, mainly because his own ideological rhetoric and, thus, political legitimacy, were based on Stalinism. Meanwhile, North Korea increased its autonomy from Chinese intervention and Chinese influence on its domestic politics. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朝鲜思想激进主义的悖论:加强思想斗争的不稳固社会基础
朝鲜是世界上最孤立的国家,自认为是一个“社会主义王朝”,拥有独特的统治意识形态。朝鲜将自己定义为“金日成国家”:领导人被奉为神明,政权从开国领袖金日成(Kim Il-Sung)传给了他的儿子金正日(Kim Jong-Il)。政治领袖对整个社会拥有绝对的权力。在这个国家发生的事件,外人往往无法理解。的确,朝鲜的政策常常显得落后得无可救药。然而,即使在20世纪90年代毁灭性的经济危机中,这个政权仍然坚持了下来。那么,朝鲜到底发生了什么?这个政权能否在未来继续生存下去?虽然很难评估该国的内部动态,主要是因为缺乏准确的信息,但本文将表明,平壤政权内部已经出现了潜在变化的迹象。特别是,我们将研究意识形态变化、加强宣传运动和摇摇欲坠的国家-社会关系社会基础之间看似矛盾的联系。当代朝鲜在意识形态上可以被描述为主体思想的社会制度化,主体思想随后转向了极右的先军政治(先军政治)和康成大国(富强国家)。在政治上,它依赖于单一的领导阶层和严格的社会管理和控制。金日成(Kim Il-Sung)发起的主体思想早已渗透到朝鲜生活的方方面面,主要是通过铺天盖地的宣传活动。在金正日时代,这种意识形态进一步激进化为军国主义,把朝鲜变成了一个倒退的驻军国家。朝鲜是一个极权主义国家,对家庭进行干预和控制。这个社会没有自由和开放的空间。尽管朝鲜最近试图重振经济,但一系列经济发展计划未能实现其目标。当将金正日政权与其父亲的政权进行比较时,主要的区别在于统治意识形态和国家-社会关系。本文主要探讨金正日政权的意识形态激进化与政权合法性的削弱之间的关系。换句话说,我们感兴趣的是研究一个谜题:具体来说,为什么这种旨在增强民众对领导人及其政策支持的意识形态激进化,讽刺地削弱了金正恩的政治合法性?朝鲜建立了一个独特的民族国家,独立于前苏联集团,建立在自己的统治意识形态之上。在苏联解体期间,朝鲜通过强调意识形态的力量,与其他社会主义政权拉开了距离。然而,一个政权崩溃的迹象正在出现,一方面是对驻军国家和极右翼民族主义的意识形态削弱,另一方面是政权无法向其人民提供商品。朝鲜的统治思想及其嬗变朝鲜的政体是以主体思想为基础的。从历史上看,主体思想的起源与金日成政权的巩固有关。自金日成时代以来,主体思想已经深入制度化,对社会产生了非常独特的影响,渗透到朝鲜生活的各个层面。因此,要了解国家的行为,必须详细阐述主体思想。主体思想的出现是对围绕着苏联和中国的内外意识形态争论的一种反应,尤其是斯大林死后苏联的去斯大林化。金日成拒绝去斯大林化,主要是因为他自己的意识形态言论,因此,政治合法性,是基于斯大林主义。与此同时,朝鲜增加了对中国干预和中国对其国内政治影响的自主权。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staying the course: Denuclearization and path dependence in the US's North Korea policy Editor-in-Chief's Comments Managing Editor's Comments Socio-Economic Change in the DPRK and Korean Security Dilemmas: The Implications for International Policy North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1