The Six-Party Talks in the Post-Kim Jong-il Era: An Emergent Path toward a Northeast Asian Security Mechanism

Q1 Arts and Humanities North Korean Review Pub Date : 2012-09-01 DOI:10.3172/NKR.8.2.111
Ki-Joon Hong
{"title":"The Six-Party Talks in the Post-Kim Jong-il Era: An Emergent Path toward a Northeast Asian Security Mechanism","authors":"Ki-Joon Hong","doi":"10.3172/NKR.8.2.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe Six-Party Talks were initiated as an ad hoc multilateral framework for dealing with the second round of the North Korean nuclear crisis in 2003. Since then, the talks have functionally expanded and been institutionally reinforced, with occasional fluctuations of ups and downs. Over the past years, there has been a dominant speculation that the talks would be a significant \"litmus test\" for determining future circumstances on the Korean Peninsula and in the Northeast Asian region. The underlying assumption of this speculation is that the successful completion of the talks would lead to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, a formal ending of the Korean War with a peace treaty, and building a Northeast Asian security mechanism. Even though the talks have stalled since November 2008, it still holds valid that the six-party process would serve as an intermediary path toward achieving peace and security on the Korean Peninsula.After a two-year-long stall of the Six-Party Talks, a new momentum for the resumption of the talks seemed to have returned recently. The inter-Korean denuclearization dialogues were held in Bali in July and in Beijing in September 2011, and the U.S.-DPRK high-level talks were held in New York in July and in Geneva in October 2011. Most recently, the third round of the U.S.-DPRK talks was held on February 23-24, 2012, in Beijing, which was the first since the death of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il on December 17, 2011. It was reported that North Korea agreed to a moratorium on nuclear tests and uranium enrichment activity, and to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to monitor the moratorium on uranium enrichment. Can this be interpreted as a signal that North Korea is ready to agree to steps demanded by Washington and Pyongyang's neighbors to restart the Six-Party Talks?Since the sudden death of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il last year, it has been speculated that the resumption of the Six-Party Talks appears unlikely for the time being. However, on the contrary, the sudden political change in North Korea seems to give an impetus to the talks. Given the recent diplomatic developments, it is sensible to speculate that the Six-Party Talks are likely to be resumed in the foreseeable future. In the same vein, the Six-Party Talks are still reasonably expected to have the potential to serve as an emergent path toward a Northeast Asian security mechanism in the future.The objective of this article is to examine the viability of the Six-Party Talks and the possibility of its transformation into a Northeast Asian security mechanism in the post-Kim Jong-il era. This article draws on the terms \"path dependence\" and \"path emergence\" as a theoretical apparatus to guide the evolutionary path from institutional self-reinforcement to transformation. Path emergence is conceptualized as a complement to the concept of path dependence. The concept of path dependence has been used to refer to a historical sequence in which contingent events set institutional patterns with deterministic properties into motion. Traditionally, path dependence theory tends to focus on mechanisms that anchor and stabilize institutional trajectories. This theory explains why the six-party process has been reinforced until now. However, it does not adequately explain institutional changes and ensuing emergent properties exhibited due to complex interactions between entities. In order to modify this theoretical lapse, the term \"path emergence\" has been coined to explain the causes underlying institutional changes and ensuing emergent properties as unintended consequences.This article consists of four main sections. The first section presents the concepts of \"path dependence\" and \"path emergence\" as a theoretical framework. The second section examines the path dependence of the Six-Party Talks. The third section explores the road map of path emergence of the Six-Party Talks. Lastly, the concluding section summarizes the research outcomes. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.8.2.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

IntroductionThe Six-Party Talks were initiated as an ad hoc multilateral framework for dealing with the second round of the North Korean nuclear crisis in 2003. Since then, the talks have functionally expanded and been institutionally reinforced, with occasional fluctuations of ups and downs. Over the past years, there has been a dominant speculation that the talks would be a significant "litmus test" for determining future circumstances on the Korean Peninsula and in the Northeast Asian region. The underlying assumption of this speculation is that the successful completion of the talks would lead to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, a formal ending of the Korean War with a peace treaty, and building a Northeast Asian security mechanism. Even though the talks have stalled since November 2008, it still holds valid that the six-party process would serve as an intermediary path toward achieving peace and security on the Korean Peninsula.After a two-year-long stall of the Six-Party Talks, a new momentum for the resumption of the talks seemed to have returned recently. The inter-Korean denuclearization dialogues were held in Bali in July and in Beijing in September 2011, and the U.S.-DPRK high-level talks were held in New York in July and in Geneva in October 2011. Most recently, the third round of the U.S.-DPRK talks was held on February 23-24, 2012, in Beijing, which was the first since the death of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il on December 17, 2011. It was reported that North Korea agreed to a moratorium on nuclear tests and uranium enrichment activity, and to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to monitor the moratorium on uranium enrichment. Can this be interpreted as a signal that North Korea is ready to agree to steps demanded by Washington and Pyongyang's neighbors to restart the Six-Party Talks?Since the sudden death of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il last year, it has been speculated that the resumption of the Six-Party Talks appears unlikely for the time being. However, on the contrary, the sudden political change in North Korea seems to give an impetus to the talks. Given the recent diplomatic developments, it is sensible to speculate that the Six-Party Talks are likely to be resumed in the foreseeable future. In the same vein, the Six-Party Talks are still reasonably expected to have the potential to serve as an emergent path toward a Northeast Asian security mechanism in the future.The objective of this article is to examine the viability of the Six-Party Talks and the possibility of its transformation into a Northeast Asian security mechanism in the post-Kim Jong-il era. This article draws on the terms "path dependence" and "path emergence" as a theoretical apparatus to guide the evolutionary path from institutional self-reinforcement to transformation. Path emergence is conceptualized as a complement to the concept of path dependence. The concept of path dependence has been used to refer to a historical sequence in which contingent events set institutional patterns with deterministic properties into motion. Traditionally, path dependence theory tends to focus on mechanisms that anchor and stabilize institutional trajectories. This theory explains why the six-party process has been reinforced until now. However, it does not adequately explain institutional changes and ensuing emergent properties exhibited due to complex interactions between entities. In order to modify this theoretical lapse, the term "path emergence" has been coined to explain the causes underlying institutional changes and ensuing emergent properties as unintended consequences.This article consists of four main sections. The first section presents the concepts of "path dependence" and "path emergence" as a theoretical framework. The second section examines the path dependence of the Six-Party Talks. The third section explores the road map of path emergence of the Six-Party Talks. Lastly, the concluding section summarizes the research outcomes. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后金正日时代的六方会谈:东北亚安全机制的新路径
六方会谈于2003年启动,作为处理第二轮朝鲜核危机的临时多边框架。从那时起,会谈在功能上得到扩大,在制度上得到加强,偶尔出现起伏。过去几年,人们普遍猜测,六方会谈将是决定朝鲜半岛和东北亚地区未来局势的重要“试金石”。这种猜测的基本假设是,如果会谈成功,将实现朝鲜半岛无核化、以和平条约形式正式结束6.25战争、建立东北亚安全机制。尽管六方会谈自2008年11月以来一直处于停滞状态,但六方会谈作为实现朝鲜半岛和平与安全的中间途径仍然有效。六方会谈在停滞了两年之后,最近似乎出现了重启六方会谈的新势头。南北韩无核化对话分别于2011年7月和9月在巴厘岛和北京举行,美朝高层会谈分别于2011年7月和10月在纽约和日内瓦举行。最近,第三轮美朝会谈于2012年2月23日至24日在北京举行,这是自2011年12月17日朝鲜领导人金正日去世以来的首次会谈。据悉,北韩同意暂停核试验和铀浓缩活动,并允许国际原子能机构(IAEA)监督暂停铀浓缩活动的情况。这是否可以被解读为朝鲜准备接受美国及其邻国要求重启六方会谈的步骤?去年北韩国防委员长金正日突然去世后,有分析认为,六方会谈在短期内很难重启。相反,北韩政局的突然变化似乎是促成会谈的动力。鉴于最近的外交事态发展,我们有理由推测六方会谈可能在可预见的未来重启。同样,六方会谈仍有可能在未来成为东北亚安全机制的新兴途径。本文的目的是考察六方会谈的可行性及其在后金正日时代转变为东北亚安全机制的可能性。本文利用“路径依赖”和“路径涌现”这两个术语作为理论工具来指导从制度自我强化到转型的进化路径。路径涌现是路径依赖概念的补充。路径依赖的概念已经被用来指一个历史序列,在这个序列中,偶然事件将具有确定性属性的制度模式设置为运动。传统上,路径依赖理论倾向于关注锚定和稳定制度轨迹的机制。这一理论解释了六方会谈到目前为止得到强化的原因。然而,它并没有充分解释制度变化和随后由于实体之间复杂的相互作用而表现出的紧急属性。为了修正这一理论失误,“路径涌现”一词被创造出来,用来解释制度变化的潜在原因,以及随之而来的意外后果。本文由四个主要部分组成。第一部分提出了“路径依赖”和“路径涌现”的概念作为理论框架。第二部分考察六方会谈的路径依赖。第三部分探讨六方会谈路径产生的路线图。最后,结语部分对研究成果进行总结。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staying the course: Denuclearization and path dependence in the US's North Korea policy Editor-in-Chief's Comments Managing Editor's Comments Socio-Economic Change in the DPRK and Korean Security Dilemmas: The Implications for International Policy North Korea and Northeast Asian Regional Security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1