J. Dai, Honggang Yu, Jie-ping Yu, Wei Li, Yan-xia Li, Gang-gang Mu
{"title":"Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in elderly patients","authors":"J. Dai, Honggang Yu, Jie-ping Yu, Wei Li, Yan-xia Li, Gang-gang Mu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2015.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for elderly patients(≥60 years old) with colorectal lesions. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 31 elderly patients(≥60 years old) and 23 non-elderly(<60 years old) patients who were found to have colorectal mucosal lesions by colonoscopy and underwent ESD treatment between January 2012 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, concomitant diseases, lesion location, lesion size and postoperative pathological diagnosis(P>0.05). Thirty-two lesions in elderly group and twenty-five lesions in non-elderly group were all curative resection. En bloc resection rates were 96.9%(31/32)and 96.0%(24/25)in the elderly group and non-elderly group respectively; the rates of bleeding during ESD procedure were 3.2%(1/31)and 4.3%(1/23); delayed bleeding rates were 12.9%(4/31)and 13.0%(3/23); the rates of perforation was 12.9%(4/31)and 0; postoperative infection rates were 3.2%(1/31) and 4.3%(1/23) respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in any of these data(P>0.05). The mean time of follow-up were(14.8±1.7)months in elderly group and(14.7±1.8)months in non-elderly group, and there was no significant difference between two groups. No residual lesion or recurrent lesion was found in the follow-up period. \n \n \nConclusion \nESD is a safe and effective treatment for the elderly patients with colorectal lesion. \n \n \nKey words: \nAged; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectum","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2015.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for elderly patients(≥60 years old) with colorectal lesions.
Methods
Data of 31 elderly patients(≥60 years old) and 23 non-elderly(<60 years old) patients who were found to have colorectal mucosal lesions by colonoscopy and underwent ESD treatment between January 2012 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied.
Results
There were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, concomitant diseases, lesion location, lesion size and postoperative pathological diagnosis(P>0.05). Thirty-two lesions in elderly group and twenty-five lesions in non-elderly group were all curative resection. En bloc resection rates were 96.9%(31/32)and 96.0%(24/25)in the elderly group and non-elderly group respectively; the rates of bleeding during ESD procedure were 3.2%(1/31)and 4.3%(1/23); delayed bleeding rates were 12.9%(4/31)and 13.0%(3/23); the rates of perforation was 12.9%(4/31)and 0; postoperative infection rates were 3.2%(1/31) and 4.3%(1/23) respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in any of these data(P>0.05). The mean time of follow-up were(14.8±1.7)months in elderly group and(14.7±1.8)months in non-elderly group, and there was no significant difference between two groups. No residual lesion or recurrent lesion was found in the follow-up period.
Conclusion
ESD is a safe and effective treatment for the elderly patients with colorectal lesion.
Key words:
Aged; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectum
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience.
The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications.
The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.