Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in elderly patients

J. Dai, Honggang Yu, Jie-ping Yu, Wei Li, Yan-xia Li, Gang-gang Mu
{"title":"Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in elderly patients","authors":"J. Dai, Honggang Yu, Jie-ping Yu, Wei Li, Yan-xia Li, Gang-gang Mu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2015.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for elderly patients(≥60 years old) with colorectal lesions. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 31 elderly patients(≥60 years old) and 23 non-elderly(<60 years old) patients who were found to have colorectal mucosal lesions by colonoscopy and underwent ESD treatment between January 2012 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, concomitant diseases, lesion location, lesion size and postoperative pathological diagnosis(P>0.05). Thirty-two lesions in elderly group and twenty-five lesions in non-elderly group were all curative resection. En bloc resection rates were 96.9%(31/32)and 96.0%(24/25)in the elderly group and non-elderly group respectively; the rates of bleeding during ESD procedure were 3.2%(1/31)and 4.3%(1/23); delayed bleeding rates were 12.9%(4/31)and 13.0%(3/23); the rates of perforation was 12.9%(4/31)and 0; postoperative infection rates were 3.2%(1/31) and 4.3%(1/23) respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in any of these data(P>0.05). The mean time of follow-up were(14.8±1.7)months in elderly group and(14.7±1.8)months in non-elderly group, and there was no significant difference between two groups. No residual lesion or recurrent lesion was found in the follow-up period. \n \n \nConclusion \nESD is a safe and effective treatment for the elderly patients with colorectal lesion. \n \n \nKey words: \nAged; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectum","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2015.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for elderly patients(≥60 years old) with colorectal lesions. Methods Data of 31 elderly patients(≥60 years old) and 23 non-elderly(<60 years old) patients who were found to have colorectal mucosal lesions by colonoscopy and underwent ESD treatment between January 2012 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied. Results There were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, concomitant diseases, lesion location, lesion size and postoperative pathological diagnosis(P>0.05). Thirty-two lesions in elderly group and twenty-five lesions in non-elderly group were all curative resection. En bloc resection rates were 96.9%(31/32)and 96.0%(24/25)in the elderly group and non-elderly group respectively; the rates of bleeding during ESD procedure were 3.2%(1/31)and 4.3%(1/23); delayed bleeding rates were 12.9%(4/31)and 13.0%(3/23); the rates of perforation was 12.9%(4/31)and 0; postoperative infection rates were 3.2%(1/31) and 4.3%(1/23) respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in any of these data(P>0.05). The mean time of follow-up were(14.8±1.7)months in elderly group and(14.7±1.8)months in non-elderly group, and there was no significant difference between two groups. No residual lesion or recurrent lesion was found in the follow-up period. Conclusion ESD is a safe and effective treatment for the elderly patients with colorectal lesion. Key words: Aged; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectum
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下粘膜夹层在老年结直肠病变中的应用
目的探讨内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗老年(≥60岁)结直肠病变的安全性和有效性。方法老年患者31例(≥60岁),非老年患者23例(0.05)。老年组32个病灶,非老年组25个病灶均根治切除。老年组和非老年组的整体切除率分别为96.9%(31/32)和96.0%(24/25);ESD术中出血率分别为3.2%(1/31)和4.3%(1/23);延迟出血率分别为12.9%(4/31)和13.0%(3/23);穿孔率为12.9%(4/31),0;术后感染率分别为3.2%(1/31)和4.3%(1/23)。两组间各项数据比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。老年组平均随访时间为(14.8±1.7)个月,非老年组平均随访时间为(14.7±1.8)个月,两组间差异无统计学意义。随访期间未发现残留病变和复发病变。结论ESD是一种安全有效的治疗老年结直肠病变的方法。关键词:老年;内镜下粘膜下剥离;Colorectum
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7555
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience. The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications. The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of cirrhosis patients with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding by three scoring systems Effects of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophageal motility in patients with achalasia Efficacy of hemostatic powder on preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery on treatment of early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma Clinical, endoscopic and pathological features of early Barrett esophageal adenocarcinoma and its treatment efficacy by endoscopic submucosal dissection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1