Problems of accounting for foreign direct investment in international and Russian statistics

Yurii K. Zaitsev
{"title":"Problems of accounting for foreign direct investment in international and Russian statistics","authors":"Yurii K. Zaitsev","doi":"10.31737/2221-2264-2022-54-2-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the approaches to statistical accounting of foreign direct investment (FDI) present in Russian and international practice, as well as alternative approaches to accounting of FDI using microdata. International practice shows that often the official statistics provided by national central banks according to the methodology of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and alternative estimates of FDI at the enterprise level differ significantly. The purpose of this article is to identify the main problems of traditional methods of accounting FDI and assess the applicability of the microdata approach to address these problems. To this end, the paper analyzes the recommendations of the OECD and the IMF on accounting FDI in statistics, as well as the methodology of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (CBR). According to the author, the methodologies of international organizations do not solve a number of problems in relation to the Russian ones. Thus, the present methodologies do not address the issue of offshore FDI, as well as the actual geographical distribution of FDI in the regions of the Russian Federation. The article demonstrates that a number of problems associated with traditional FDI statistics can be addressed with enterprise microdata. The article proves why traditional statistics can give a distorted picture due to unresolved issues of these and other issues, and shows how microdata can help in solving this problem. In particular, micro-level data helps to understand the structure of FDI at the regional level, as well as the role of offshore companies in the structure of inbound and outbound FDI.","PeriodicalId":43676,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal Novaya Ekonomicheskaya Assotsiatsiya-Journal of the New Economic Association","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal Novaya Ekonomicheskaya Assotsiatsiya-Journal of the New Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-54-2-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the approaches to statistical accounting of foreign direct investment (FDI) present in Russian and international practice, as well as alternative approaches to accounting of FDI using microdata. International practice shows that often the official statistics provided by national central banks according to the methodology of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and alternative estimates of FDI at the enterprise level differ significantly. The purpose of this article is to identify the main problems of traditional methods of accounting FDI and assess the applicability of the microdata approach to address these problems. To this end, the paper analyzes the recommendations of the OECD and the IMF on accounting FDI in statistics, as well as the methodology of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (CBR). According to the author, the methodologies of international organizations do not solve a number of problems in relation to the Russian ones. Thus, the present methodologies do not address the issue of offshore FDI, as well as the actual geographical distribution of FDI in the regions of the Russian Federation. The article demonstrates that a number of problems associated with traditional FDI statistics can be addressed with enterprise microdata. The article proves why traditional statistics can give a distorted picture due to unresolved issues of these and other issues, and shows how microdata can help in solving this problem. In particular, micro-level data helps to understand the structure of FDI at the regional level, as well as the role of offshore companies in the structure of inbound and outbound FDI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在国际和俄罗斯统计中计算外国直接投资的问题
本文讨论了目前在俄罗斯和国际实践中对外国直接投资(FDI)进行统计核算的方法,以及利用微观数据对外国直接投资进行核算的替代方法。国际惯例表明,各国中央银行根据国际货币基金组织(货币基金组织)和经济合作与发展组织的方法所提供的官方统计数字和企业一级外国直接投资的其他估计数往往差别很大。本文的目的是确定传统的外国直接投资会计方法的主要问题,并评估微数据方法的适用性,以解决这些问题。为此,本文分析了经合发组织和国际货币基金组织关于统计外国直接投资的建议,以及俄罗斯联邦中央银行(CBR)的方法。发件人认为,国际组织的方法不能解决与俄罗斯的方法有关的一些问题。因此,目前的方法没有处理境外外国直接投资的问题,以及外国直接投资在俄罗斯联邦各区域的实际地理分布情况。本文表明,与传统的外国直接投资统计有关的一些问题可以用企业微数据来解决。本文证明了为什么由于这些问题和其他问题的未解决问题,传统统计数据可能会给出扭曲的图像,并展示了微数据如何帮助解决这一问题。具体而言,微观层面的数据有助于了解区域一级的外国直接投资结构,以及离岸公司在流入和流出的外国直接投资结构中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Key Journal''s objectives: bring together economists of different schools of thought across the Russian Federation; strengthen ties between Academy institutes, educational establishments and economic research centers; improve the quality of Russian economic research and education; integrate economic science and education; speed up the integration of Russian economic science in the global mainstream of economic research. The Journal publishes both theoretical and empirical articles, devoted to all aspects of economic science, which are of interest for wide range of specialists. It welcomes high-quality interdisciplinary projects and economic studies employing methodologies from other sciences such as physics, psychology, political science, etc. Special attention is paid to analyses of processes occurring in the Russian economy. Decisions about publishing of articles are based on a double-blind review process. Exceptions are short notes in the section "Hot Topic", which is usually formed by special invitations and after considerations of the Editorial Board. The only criterion to publish is the quality of the work (original approach, significance and substance of findings, clear presentation style). No decision to publish or reject an article will be influenced by the author belonging to whatever public movement or putting forward ideas advocated by whatever political movement. The Journal comes out four times a year, each issue consisting of 12 to 15 press sheets. Now it is published only in Russian. The English translations of the Journal issues are posted on the Journal website as open access resources.
期刊最新文献
Neoclassical roots of behavioral economics Democratic capital and economic growth in the countries of the third wave of democratization Russian- Chinese economic links in the context of growing international tensions Russia–India trade relations in terms of increasing geopolitical uncertainty The potential of Russia–DPRK cooperation: economic advantages and political disadvantages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1