Social Values in Economic Environmental Valuation: A Conceptual Framework

IF 2.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Values Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3197/096327123x16702350862728
J. Massenberg, B. Hansjürgens, N. Lienhoop
{"title":"Social Values in Economic Environmental Valuation: A Conceptual Framework","authors":"J. Massenberg, B. Hansjürgens, N. Lienhoop","doi":"10.3197/096327123x16702350862728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic environmental valuation remains a much debated and contested issue. Concerns have been voiced that it is unable to capture the manifold immaterial values of ecosystems due to conceptual and methodological issues. Thus, additional value categories (social values) as well as novel valuation approaches like deliberative (monetary) valuation are areas of growing interest, yet the theoretical foundations are rather weak. Against this background, this article aims to develop a consistent conceptual framework for making sense of social values in economic environmental valuation. Based on a holistic view of society and individuals, the role of institutions, the social environment, culture and transcendental values is emphasised. To synthesise diverging concepts of value into an economic concept and to account for the multidimensionality of social values, the framework consists of three spheres: social, natural and contextual. The novel framework demonstrates that social values may be integrated into a preference-based utility framework when denoting a holistic understanding of social preferences and human embeddedness in nature and society.","PeriodicalId":47200,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Values","volume":"8 1","pages":"611 - 643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Values","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3197/096327123x16702350862728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Economic environmental valuation remains a much debated and contested issue. Concerns have been voiced that it is unable to capture the manifold immaterial values of ecosystems due to conceptual and methodological issues. Thus, additional value categories (social values) as well as novel valuation approaches like deliberative (monetary) valuation are areas of growing interest, yet the theoretical foundations are rather weak. Against this background, this article aims to develop a consistent conceptual framework for making sense of social values in economic environmental valuation. Based on a holistic view of society and individuals, the role of institutions, the social environment, culture and transcendental values is emphasised. To synthesise diverging concepts of value into an economic concept and to account for the multidimensionality of social values, the framework consists of three spheres: social, natural and contextual. The novel framework demonstrates that social values may be integrated into a preference-based utility framework when denoting a holistic understanding of social preferences and human embeddedness in nature and society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济环境评估中的社会价值:一个概念框架
经济环境评估仍然是一个备受争议的问题。有人担心,由于概念和方法上的问题,它无法捕捉生态系统的多种非物质价值。因此,附加价值类别(社会价值)以及像审议(货币)估值这样的新估值方法是人们越来越感兴趣的领域,但理论基础相当薄弱。在此背景下,本文旨在建立一个一致的概念框架,以理解经济环境评估中的社会价值。基于对社会和个人的整体看法,强调制度、社会环境、文化和先验价值的作用。为了将不同的价值概念综合成一个经济概念,并考虑到社会价值的多维性,该框架由三个领域组成:社会、自然和环境。新框架表明,当表示对社会偏好和人类在自然和社会中的嵌入性的整体理解时,社会价值可以整合到基于偏好的效用框架中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Every tree fixed with a purpose: Contesting value in Olmsted's parks On degrowth strategy: The Simpler Way perspective A social and ethical game-changer? An empirical ethics study of CRISPR in the salmon farming industry Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies Book Review: Strange Natures. Conservation in the Era of Synthetic Biology by Kent H. Redford and William M. Adams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1