Personal Data Sensitivity in Japan

Fukuta Yasunori, Murata Kiyoshi, A. Adams Andrew, Orito Yohko, Lara Palma Ana María
{"title":"Personal Data Sensitivity in Japan","authors":"Fukuta Yasunori,&nbsp;Murata Kiyoshi,&nbsp;A. Adams Andrew,&nbsp;Orito Yohko,&nbsp;Lara Palma Ana María","doi":"10.29297/orbit.v1i2.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate how ordinary Japanese people perceive and understand data sensitivity and sensitive data. Although the concept of sensitive data is described in an article of Japan’s revised personal data act, following the EU Data Protection Directive and the new data protection rule, there has been little research on whether this legally defined concept conforms to the general public’s perception of sensitive data in Japan and, if not, what differences exist between them. Using empirical data acquired through a questionnaire survey and appropriate statistical methods, we sought to clarify empirically the features of data sensitivity as perceived by ordinary Japanese people. This exploratory research revealed that ordinary Japanese tended to feel relatively low sensitivity to personal data related to their civic activities, which are typically mentioned in the official explanation of sensitive data, but they tended to feel a higher degree of sensitivity regarding financial-related personal data, which were not ordinarily considered sensitive data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101247,"journal":{"name":"The ORBIT Journal","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300432/pdf?md5=1cfe3d158cb25a6584f7f80fd2f37841&pid=1-s2.0-S2515856220300432-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ORBIT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate how ordinary Japanese people perceive and understand data sensitivity and sensitive data. Although the concept of sensitive data is described in an article of Japan’s revised personal data act, following the EU Data Protection Directive and the new data protection rule, there has been little research on whether this legally defined concept conforms to the general public’s perception of sensitive data in Japan and, if not, what differences exist between them. Using empirical data acquired through a questionnaire survey and appropriate statistical methods, we sought to clarify empirically the features of data sensitivity as perceived by ordinary Japanese people. This exploratory research revealed that ordinary Japanese tended to feel relatively low sensitivity to personal data related to their civic activities, which are typically mentioned in the official explanation of sensitive data, but they tended to feel a higher degree of sensitivity regarding financial-related personal data, which were not ordinarily considered sensitive data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本的个人资料敏感性
本研究的目的是调查普通日本人如何看待和理解数据敏感性和敏感数据。尽管在欧盟数据保护指令和新的数据保护规则之后,日本修订的个人数据法中有一条描述了敏感数据的概念,但对于这一法律定义的概念是否符合日本公众对敏感数据的看法,如果不符合,两者之间存在什么差异,研究很少。利用问卷调查和适当的统计方法获得的经验数据,我们试图从经验上阐明普通日本人感知的数据敏感性特征。这一探索性研究表明,普通日本人对与他们的公民活动相关的个人数据的敏感度相对较低,这通常在官方对敏感数据的解释中提到,但他们对与金融相关的个人数据的敏感度往往较高,而这些数据通常不被视为敏感数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethical Implications of Predictive Risk Intelligence Setting future ethical standards for ICT, Big Data, AI and robotics Case Study The Internet of Things and Ethics Ethics of Public Use of AI and Big Data Ethics of Using Smart City AI and Big Data: The Case of Four Large European Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1