The quality of life among middle-school adolescents in Krakow.

Agnieszka Magiera, A. Sowa, R. Jacek, A. Pac
{"title":"The quality of life among middle-school adolescents in Krakow.","authors":"Agnieszka Magiera, A. Sowa, R. Jacek, A. Pac","doi":"10.34763/devperiodmed.20172102.124130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe aim of the study was to describe the quality of life of Polish adolescents living in a big city and to investigate whether there are differences in this respect between girls and boys. Moreover, we would like to compare the results concerning the quality of life of the screened adolescents from Krakow with those of their European peers.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nThe survey was carried out in 2013-2015 in 17 middle schools in Krakow based on anonymous auditorium questionnaires. The analysis included the responses of 1387 pupils - 686 girls and 701 boys. In order to assess the quality of life, the Polish version of the international KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire was used. Five dimensions of the quality of life (Qol) were analyzed. The specific dimensions of Qol were analyzed using 0-100 point scales, as well as T-scores standardized for the European population.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean values for five dimensions of quality of life assessed by the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire ranged from 54 pts. to 65 pts. (maximum score 100 pts.). However, the results for the Polish adolescents were lower when compared to their European peers. The greatest differences in the level of Qol between Polish adolescents and their European peers involved the following dimensions: Psychological Wellbeing and School Environment. On average, girls scored their Qol lower than boys in three out of five dimensions (Physical Well-being, Psychological Well-being, Autonomy & Parents; p<0.001). Additionally, using the norm data for the Polish population (sex and age specific), more girls than boys were classified as having low Qol regarding the School Environment (23.5%vs 14.8%; p<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPolish adolescents scored their Qol lower than their European peers. The quality of life for girls was significantly lower than of boys, except for the relation with their friends and peers (Social Support & Peers).","PeriodicalId":35058,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna wieku rozwojowego","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna wieku rozwojowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34763/devperiodmed.20172102.124130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

AIM The aim of the study was to describe the quality of life of Polish adolescents living in a big city and to investigate whether there are differences in this respect between girls and boys. Moreover, we would like to compare the results concerning the quality of life of the screened adolescents from Krakow with those of their European peers. MATERIAL AND METHODS The survey was carried out in 2013-2015 in 17 middle schools in Krakow based on anonymous auditorium questionnaires. The analysis included the responses of 1387 pupils - 686 girls and 701 boys. In order to assess the quality of life, the Polish version of the international KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire was used. Five dimensions of the quality of life (Qol) were analyzed. The specific dimensions of Qol were analyzed using 0-100 point scales, as well as T-scores standardized for the European population. RESULTS The mean values for five dimensions of quality of life assessed by the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire ranged from 54 pts. to 65 pts. (maximum score 100 pts.). However, the results for the Polish adolescents were lower when compared to their European peers. The greatest differences in the level of Qol between Polish adolescents and their European peers involved the following dimensions: Psychological Wellbeing and School Environment. On average, girls scored their Qol lower than boys in three out of five dimensions (Physical Well-being, Psychological Well-being, Autonomy & Parents; p<0.001). Additionally, using the norm data for the Polish population (sex and age specific), more girls than boys were classified as having low Qol regarding the School Environment (23.5%vs 14.8%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Polish adolescents scored their Qol lower than their European peers. The quality of life for girls was significantly lower than of boys, except for the relation with their friends and peers (Social Support & Peers).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克拉科夫中学生的生活质量。
目的:本研究的目的是描述生活在大城市的波兰青少年的生活质量,并调查在这方面女孩和男孩之间是否存在差异。此外,我们还想将克拉科夫接受筛查的青少年的生活质量与欧洲同龄人的生活质量进行比较。材料与方法本调查于2013-2015年在克拉科夫的17所中学进行,采用匿名礼堂问卷。这项分析包括了1387名学生的回答,其中686名是女生,701名是男生。为了评估生活质量,使用了波兰版的国际KIDSCREEN-27问卷。对生活质量(Qol)的五个维度进行分析。生活质量的具体维度使用0-100分量表进行分析,以及欧洲人口标准化的t分数。结果KIDSCREEN-27问卷评估的生活质量五个维度的平均值为54分。65分。(满分100分)。然而,与欧洲同龄人相比,波兰青少年的成绩较低。波兰青少年与欧洲同龄人在生活质量水平上的最大差异涉及以下几个维度:心理健康和学校环境。平均而言,女孩的生活质量在五个维度中的三个方面低于男孩(身体健康、心理健康、自主性和父母;p < 0.001)。此外,使用波兰人口(特定性别和年龄)的标准数据,在学校环境方面,被归类为生活质量低的女孩多于男孩(23.5%对14.8%;p < 0.001)。结论波兰青少年的生活质量低于欧洲同龄人。除了与朋友和同伴的关系(Social Support & peers)外,女孩的生活质量显著低于男孩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medycyna wieku rozwojowego
Medycyna wieku rozwojowego Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Neonatal Gartner Duct Cyst: Two Case Reports and Literature Review. Recent highlights of research on androgen receptors in women. Nutrition of infants and young children in Poland - Pitnuts 2016. Perinatal mortality and morbidity of growth restricted fetuses and newborns (own experience) - first report. Allergens and food additives, including potentially harmful ones, present in food products that are preferred by children and adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1