OS LIMITES DA LIBERDADE CONTRATUAL E O (DES)RESPEITO À PROTEÇÃO DO RISCO NAS APÓLICES DE SEGURO

Ludimila Poirier
{"title":"OS LIMITES DA LIBERDADE CONTRATUAL E O (DES)RESPEITO À PROTEÇÃO DO RISCO NAS APÓLICES DE SEGURO","authors":"Ludimila Poirier","doi":"10.29327/270098.14.23-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to outline some considerations about the Judgment of the STJ of 01/24/2018, rendered in the records of Case No. 534/15.2T8VCT. G1.S1, in Portugal. The problem is related to the delimitation of liability operated by the limitation and exclusion clauses contained in the General Conditions and Special Conditions of the insurance contract policies at the time of contracting. Differentiating between the prohibited clauses and the clauses that aim to delimit the object of the","PeriodicalId":31433,"journal":{"name":"Revista ESMAT","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ESMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/270098.14.23-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to outline some considerations about the Judgment of the STJ of 01/24/2018, rendered in the records of Case No. 534/15.2T8VCT. G1.S1, in Portugal. The problem is related to the delimitation of liability operated by the limitation and exclusion clauses contained in the General Conditions and Special Conditions of the insurance contract policies at the time of contracting. Differentiating between the prohibited clauses and the clauses that aim to delimit the object of the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合同自由的限制和对保险单风险保护的尊重
本文的目的是概述关于第534/15.2T8VCT号案件记录中2018年1月24日STJ判决的一些考虑。G1。S1,在葡萄牙。这个问题涉及到在签订合同时,保险合同的一般条件和特殊条件中所包含的限制和排除条款所操作的责任界定。区分禁止条款和旨在划定对象的条款
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
CONSUMO VERDE E ECONOMIA COMPARTILHADA COMO TENDÊNCIAS RENOVADORAS DAS RELAÇÕES SOCIOAMBIENTAIS A NOÇÃO DE SMART CONTRACTS, POSSÍVEIS PROBLEMAS E SUA UTILIZAÇÃO PELA ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA COMO PENSAM OS CONSELHEIROS: UMA ANÁLISE DO PERFIL DAS DECISÕES ADMINISTRATIVAS NO ÂMBITO DO CONSELHO ADMINISTRATIVO DE RECURSOS FISCAIS (CARF) INCONSECUENCIAS ANTE DISTINTOS TIPOS DE GUERRAS. EL EJEMPLO DEL COVID-19 CONTROLE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DO DECRETI-LEGGE ITALIANO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1