Research progress of evaluation system for China circular agriculture development.

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture Pub Date : 2013-10-30 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.01039
Hang Yu, Long Pan, Chen Yuan-quan, S. Peng, Gu ShiGui
{"title":"Research progress of evaluation system for China circular agriculture development.","authors":"Hang Yu, Long Pan, Chen Yuan-quan, S. Peng, Gu ShiGui","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.01039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research and practices on circular agriculture(CA) has been hotspots of Chinese agriculture development in recent years.CA plays a significant role in resource using,energy saving,emission reduction,enterprise and industry development,and farmer income improvement in China.How to build a suitable evaluation system is one of the top issues on the CA research and development.In this paper,the general progresses of CA researches were discussed,and the evaluating content,indicators and methods were summarized as well.Generally,the evaluation for CA was classified as two types.The first was macro-evaluation focusing on the national or regional scale,whose indexes were constructed base on the social and economic development,resource reduces,resource recycle and safety of resource and environment dimensions.The goal of this kind of evaluation was to determined the social,economic and ecological effects of CA development.Another kind was micro-evaluation focusing on the industrial park,enterprise,or local farm system scale,whose goal was assessment of the features of materials cycling and energy flow in CA systems,and the environment impacts as well.Many methods were introduced in this kind evaluation including system dynamic,emergy,life cycle assessment,etc.At the same time,there existed marked difference in evaluating content,indicators and methods for the micro-evaluation.Furthermore,the suitable evaluation index for different scales(national,regional,enterprise,detailed pattern or technology,etc.) were expected to further study,which should be according with the 4R rule(recycle,reuse,reduce and regulate) of CA.","PeriodicalId":10032,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture","volume":"21 1","pages":"1039-1048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.01039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Research and practices on circular agriculture(CA) has been hotspots of Chinese agriculture development in recent years.CA plays a significant role in resource using,energy saving,emission reduction,enterprise and industry development,and farmer income improvement in China.How to build a suitable evaluation system is one of the top issues on the CA research and development.In this paper,the general progresses of CA researches were discussed,and the evaluating content,indicators and methods were summarized as well.Generally,the evaluation for CA was classified as two types.The first was macro-evaluation focusing on the national or regional scale,whose indexes were constructed base on the social and economic development,resource reduces,resource recycle and safety of resource and environment dimensions.The goal of this kind of evaluation was to determined the social,economic and ecological effects of CA development.Another kind was micro-evaluation focusing on the industrial park,enterprise,or local farm system scale,whose goal was assessment of the features of materials cycling and energy flow in CA systems,and the environment impacts as well.Many methods were introduced in this kind evaluation including system dynamic,emergy,life cycle assessment,etc.At the same time,there existed marked difference in evaluating content,indicators and methods for the micro-evaluation.Furthermore,the suitable evaluation index for different scales(national,regional,enterprise,detailed pattern or technology,etc.) were expected to further study,which should be according with the 4R rule(recycle,reuse,reduce and regulate) of CA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国循环农业发展评价体系研究进展。
循环农业的研究与实践是近年来我国农业发展的热点。农业生产在中国资源利用、节能减排、企业产业发展、农民收入提高等方面发挥着重要作用。如何建立一个合适的评价体系是CA研究与开发的首要问题之一。本文综述了国内外CA的研究进展,并对CA的评价内容、指标和方法进行了综述。一般来说,对CA的评价分为两种类型。一是以国家或区域为尺度的宏观评价,从社会经济发展、资源减量、资源循环和资源环境安全四个维度构建指标。这种评价的目的是确定农业发展的社会、经济和生态效应。另一种是微观评价,侧重于工业园区、企业或当地农场系统规模,其目标是评估CA系统中物质循环和能量流动的特征,以及对环境的影响。介绍了系统动态评价、能量评价、生命周期评价等评价方法。同时,在微观评价的内容、指标和方法上也存在显著差异。进一步研究适合不同尺度(国家、区域、企业、具体模式或技术等)的评价指标,该指标应符合CA的4R规则(recycle,reuse,reduce, regulation)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture
Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
生物炭对土壤中重金属铜、土霉素复合污染的影响研究 大豆光敏色素生色团合成基因GmHY2的克隆及功能分析 基于压力-状态-响应模型的寒地粳稻杂交育种后代选择与实现 垄作稻-鱼-鸡共生对水稻茎秆倒伏、穗部性状及产量的影响 Spatial variation in major water quality types and its relationships with land cover in the middle and lower reaches of Aral Sea Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1