Effect of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention on nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer disease: A randomized controlled study

Xiaoxuan Liu, Hongdi Du, Huo Xiaopeng, Hong Jiang
{"title":"Effect of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention on nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life in hospitalized patients with Alzheimer disease: A randomized controlled study","authors":"Xiaoxuan Liu, Hongdi Du, Huo Xiaopeng, Hong Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the effect of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention on nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life in hospitalized Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 170 hospitalized AD patients who met the criteria of the protocol were enrolled and divided randomly into two groups as study group (n=86) and control group (n=84). The two groups received nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention and routine nutritional management respectively for six weeks. Nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life were measured by nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and quality of life-Alzheimer disease scale before and after the nutritional intervention. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. The suitable rate of NRS 2002 was 100%. After a 6-week intervention, the prevalence of nutritional risk (41.9% vs. 70.9%, P<0.001) and undernutrition (17.4% vs. 30.2%, P=0.049) decreased significantly in study group. The prevalence of nutritional risk was significantly lower in study group than in control group (41.9% vs. 64.3%, P=0.003). The score of quality of life in study group significantly increased (34.12±5.91 vs. 31.56±6.80, P=0.028) after the intervention, and was significantly higher than that of the control group (34.12±5.91 vs. 31.63±6.22, P=0.030). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe application of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention can help to improve the nutritional status and quality of life in hospitalized AD patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nAlzheimer disease; Inpatients; Nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention; Nutritional risk; Quality of life","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention on nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life in hospitalized Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. Methods A total of 170 hospitalized AD patients who met the criteria of the protocol were enrolled and divided randomly into two groups as study group (n=86) and control group (n=84). The two groups received nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention and routine nutritional management respectively for six weeks. Nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life were measured by nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and quality of life-Alzheimer disease scale before and after the nutritional intervention. Results There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. The suitable rate of NRS 2002 was 100%. After a 6-week intervention, the prevalence of nutritional risk (41.9% vs. 70.9%, P<0.001) and undernutrition (17.4% vs. 30.2%, P=0.049) decreased significantly in study group. The prevalence of nutritional risk was significantly lower in study group than in control group (41.9% vs. 64.3%, P=0.003). The score of quality of life in study group significantly increased (34.12±5.91 vs. 31.56±6.80, P=0.028) after the intervention, and was significantly higher than that of the control group (34.12±5.91 vs. 31.63±6.22, P=0.030). Conclusion The application of nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention can help to improve the nutritional status and quality of life in hospitalized AD patients. Key words: Alzheimer disease; Inpatients; Nurse-led intensive nutritional intervention; Nutritional risk; Quality of life
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士主导的强化营养干预对住院阿尔茨海默病患者营养风险、营养不良和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照研究
目的探讨护士主导的强化营养干预对阿尔茨海默病(AD)住院患者营养风险、营养不良及生活质量的影响。方法选取符合方案标准的住院AD患者170例,随机分为研究组(n=86)和对照组(n=84)。两组患者分别接受护士主导的强化营养干预和常规营养管理,为期6周。采用营养风险筛查2002 (NRS 2002)和阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表对营养干预前后的营养风险、营养不足和生活质量进行测量。结果两组患者的基线数据无显著差异。2002年国家标准的适宜率为100%。干预6周后,研究组营养风险患病率(41.9% vs. 70.9%, P<0.001)和营养不良患病率(17.4% vs. 30.2%, P=0.049)显著降低。研究组营养风险发生率明显低于对照组(41.9% vs. 64.3%, P=0.003)。实验组患者干预后生活质量评分显著升高(34.12±5.91比31.56±6.80,P=0.028),显著高于对照组(34.12±5.91比31.63±6.22,P=0.030)。结论护士主导的强化营养干预有助于改善住院AD患者的营养状况和生活质量。关键词:阿尔茨海默病;住院病人;护士主导的强化营养干预;营养风险;生活质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华临床营养杂志
中华临床营养杂志 Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2282
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Trends and strategies of intestinal microecological intervention for chronic diseases Radiation induced mucositis and its relationship with nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy Prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition and observation of nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients with stroke in a teaching hospital in Beijing Clinical significance of peri-operative change of serum inorganic phosphate levels after moderate-to-major abdominal surgery Clinical high-risk factors of metabolic bone disease in very low birth weight infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1