Yecheng Liu, Lei Guo, Zhi-wei Qi, Jun Xu, Huadong Zhu
{"title":"Comparison of plasma exchange and insulin in the treatment of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis","authors":"Yecheng Liu, Lei Guo, Zhi-wei Qi, Jun Xu, Huadong Zhu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy of two rapid lipid lowering methods as plasma exchange and insulin in the treatment of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 98 patients with hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into plasma exchange group (n=42) and insulin group (n=56) according to rapid lipid lowering method. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no significant differences in the onset-to-treatment time, the proportion of patients with diabetes, the proportion of patients with pregnancy, the initial triglyceride level, Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score and modified CT severity index score score and conditioning-test stimulus interval(CTSI) score between the plasma exchange group and the insulin group (P>0.05). In addition, there were also no significant differences in the incidences of acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, shock and pancreatic abscess, and the proportion of moderate pancreatitis and severe pancreatitis, oral / jejunum nutrition tolerating start time, hospitalization time and mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). The plasma exchange group had significantly less time to achieve the target triglyceride level and to reach normal free fatty acids level than the insulin group [(13.09 ±12.50)h vs. (46.92±20.92)h, t=3.291, P=0.001; (15.75±14.13)h vs.(73.21±38.49)h, t=3.291, P=0.001]. The pancreatic pseudocyst incidence was significantly lower (7.14% vs.23.21%, t=2.120, P=0.034), and the hospitalization cost was significantly higher[(81 794.92±33 719.69)yuan vs. (56 042.43±30 565.34)yuan, t=2.034, P=0.042] in the plasma exchange group than in the insulin group. \n \n \nConclusions \nBoth plasma exchange and insulin can rapidly lower blood lipids. Plasma exchange has certain advantages over insulin in lipid-lowering, for it is faster, and has lower incidence of pancreatic pseudocyst, thus can be applied in patients whose financial conditions permit. \n \n \nKey words: \nAcute fat pancreatitis; Plasma exchange; Insulin","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"202-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective
To compare the efficacy of two rapid lipid lowering methods as plasma exchange and insulin in the treatment of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis.
Methods
The clinical data of 98 patients with hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into plasma exchange group (n=42) and insulin group (n=56) according to rapid lipid lowering method.
Results
There were no significant differences in the onset-to-treatment time, the proportion of patients with diabetes, the proportion of patients with pregnancy, the initial triglyceride level, Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score and modified CT severity index score score and conditioning-test stimulus interval(CTSI) score between the plasma exchange group and the insulin group (P>0.05). In addition, there were also no significant differences in the incidences of acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, shock and pancreatic abscess, and the proportion of moderate pancreatitis and severe pancreatitis, oral / jejunum nutrition tolerating start time, hospitalization time and mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). The plasma exchange group had significantly less time to achieve the target triglyceride level and to reach normal free fatty acids level than the insulin group [(13.09 ±12.50)h vs. (46.92±20.92)h, t=3.291, P=0.001; (15.75±14.13)h vs.(73.21±38.49)h, t=3.291, P=0.001]. The pancreatic pseudocyst incidence was significantly lower (7.14% vs.23.21%, t=2.120, P=0.034), and the hospitalization cost was significantly higher[(81 794.92±33 719.69)yuan vs. (56 042.43±30 565.34)yuan, t=2.034, P=0.042] in the plasma exchange group than in the insulin group.
Conclusions
Both plasma exchange and insulin can rapidly lower blood lipids. Plasma exchange has certain advantages over insulin in lipid-lowering, for it is faster, and has lower incidence of pancreatic pseudocyst, thus can be applied in patients whose financial conditions permit.
Key words:
Acute fat pancreatitis; Plasma exchange; Insulin
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch.
The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.