Chromosomal Mosaicism in Cleavage Stage Embryos vs. Blastocyst Stage Embryos

S. El-Bisari, D. Alyounis, W. Sayed, S. Uppal
{"title":"Chromosomal Mosaicism in Cleavage Stage Embryos vs. Blastocyst Stage Embryos","authors":"S. El-Bisari, D. Alyounis, W. Sayed, S. Uppal","doi":"10.37421/1747-0862.2020.14.462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of more than one chromosomally different cell line in an individual. Preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of a mixture of chromosomally different cell lines in an embryo. Studies show that mosaicism for whole chromosomes (aneuploidies) in one or more cells (blastomeres) occurred in more than 75% of cleavage stage embryos, whilst 3%-24% of blastocyst stage embryos are chromosomally mosaic. Aim: The purpose of this study was to standardize and validate a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) method for comprehensive chromosome testing for aneuploidies and to study the level of mosaicism in cleavages stage vs. blastocyst stage embryos. Methods: The validation involved a retrospective blind assessment of whole genome amplification (WGA) products from 14 cleavages stage embryo biopsies (blastomeres), 6 blastocyst stage embryo biopsies (TE), in addition to their 20 discarded blastocyst stage whole embryos. 42.8% of the cleavages stage embryos showed mosaicism, whilst results between the trophectoderm (TE) biopsies (TEB) and their whole embryos at blastocyst stage showed total concordance as no mosaicism was observed. NGS sensitivity and specificity for calling aneuploidy was found to be 100%. Conclusion: This is the first study reporting preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of the Ion semiconductor sequencing technology in studying the level of mosaicism in cleavage stage and TE biopsies blastocyst stage embryos vs. their whole embryos. The high level of mosaicism in cleavages stage embryos compared to blastocyst stage embryos does not recommend the PGT-A to be performed on cleavage stage embryos. The NGS proved to be a robust methodology in clinical application of PGT-A.","PeriodicalId":88269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/1747-0862.2020.14.462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of more than one chromosomally different cell line in an individual. Preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of a mixture of chromosomally different cell lines in an embryo. Studies show that mosaicism for whole chromosomes (aneuploidies) in one or more cells (blastomeres) occurred in more than 75% of cleavage stage embryos, whilst 3%-24% of blastocyst stage embryos are chromosomally mosaic. Aim: The purpose of this study was to standardize and validate a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) method for comprehensive chromosome testing for aneuploidies and to study the level of mosaicism in cleavages stage vs. blastocyst stage embryos. Methods: The validation involved a retrospective blind assessment of whole genome amplification (WGA) products from 14 cleavages stage embryo biopsies (blastomeres), 6 blastocyst stage embryo biopsies (TE), in addition to their 20 discarded blastocyst stage whole embryos. 42.8% of the cleavages stage embryos showed mosaicism, whilst results between the trophectoderm (TE) biopsies (TEB) and their whole embryos at blastocyst stage showed total concordance as no mosaicism was observed. NGS sensitivity and specificity for calling aneuploidy was found to be 100%. Conclusion: This is the first study reporting preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of the Ion semiconductor sequencing technology in studying the level of mosaicism in cleavage stage and TE biopsies blastocyst stage embryos vs. their whole embryos. The high level of mosaicism in cleavages stage embryos compared to blastocyst stage embryos does not recommend the PGT-A to be performed on cleavage stage embryos. The NGS proved to be a robust methodology in clinical application of PGT-A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎的染色体嵌合现象
染色体嵌合体的特点是在一个个体中存在不止一种不同的染色体细胞系。着床前染色体嵌合的特点是胚胎中存在不同染色体细胞系的混合物。研究表明,超过75%的卵裂期胚胎在一个或多个细胞(卵裂球)中出现全染色体嵌合现象(非整倍体),而3%-24%的囊胚期胚胎是染色体嵌合现象。目的:本研究的目的是标准化和验证用于非整倍体染色体综合检测的下一代测序(NGS)方法,并研究卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎的嵌合水平。方法:对14例卵裂期胚胎活检(卵裂球)、6例囊胚期胚胎活检(TE)以及20例囊胚期全胚的全基因组扩增(WGA)产物进行回顾性盲评价。42.8%的卵裂期胚胎显示嵌合现象,而滋养外胚层(TE)活检(TEB)结果与囊胚期全胚完全一致,未观察到嵌合现象。NGS检测非整倍体的敏感性和特异性均为100%。结论:这是首次报道离子半导体测序技术在研究卵裂期和TE活检囊胚期胚胎与整个胚胎嵌合水平方面的临床前验证和准确性评估。与囊胚期胚胎相比,卵裂期胚胎的嵌合体水平较高,因此不建议在卵裂期胚胎上进行PGT-A。NGS被证明是PGT-A临床应用的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cell Systems Biology of Translation Factors and Proteasome-Targeted Protein Complexes Associated with AGC Kinase Sch 9 Molecular Linking of HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) and Tregs (Regulatory T- cells) in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer - A Review Editorial Note for Medicine Aspects Editorial Note for Genetic Aspects Disseminated Condensing Osteopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1