A Retrospective Review of Copy Number Variants and Ultrasound-Detected Soft Markers

Kajal Angras, Lindsay Bailey, Pallvi K. Singh, A. Young, J. Ross
{"title":"A Retrospective Review of Copy Number Variants and Ultrasound-Detected Soft Markers","authors":"Kajal Angras, Lindsay Bailey, Pallvi K. Singh, A. Young, J. Ross","doi":"10.37421/JMGM.2020.14.448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To examine the association of copy number variants (CNV) among fetuses with ultrasound-detected soft markers (USM).  Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of fetuses with prenatal or children with postnatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) sought to examine an association between clinically relevant CNV (classified as pathogenic CNV or variants of uncertain significance (VUS)) and USM in women who delivered at Geisinger between January 2010 and July 2018. The following USM were evaluated: choroid plexus cyst, thickened nuchal fold, absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, echogenic intracardiac focus, echogenic bowel, short long bones, and urinary tract dilation. Fetuses or children with known aneuploidy or a single gene disorder were excluded. Odds ratios (OR) of the association between CNV and USM were reported along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. P values <0.05 were considered significant.  Results: Of the 348 fetuses/children, 89 (25.6%) had a clinically relevant CNV. Similar percentages of demographic, delivery and neonate characteristics were noted for those with a clinically relevant CNV and those with a normal microarray analysis. No statistically significant differences were noted among those fetuses/children with a clinically relevant CNV and structural anomaly (p = 0.52; OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.72-1.92), presence of one USM (p = 0.72; OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.79-2.92), or presence of more than one USM (p = 0.79; OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.28-8.72).  Conclusion: Our data supports a lack of association between a clinically relevant copy number variant and an ultrasound-detected soft marker. A small statistically insignificant increase in odds of a clinically relevant CNV was noted for those fetuses/children with one or more USM.","PeriodicalId":88269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/JMGM.2020.14.448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association of copy number variants (CNV) among fetuses with ultrasound-detected soft markers (USM).  Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of fetuses with prenatal or children with postnatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) sought to examine an association between clinically relevant CNV (classified as pathogenic CNV or variants of uncertain significance (VUS)) and USM in women who delivered at Geisinger between January 2010 and July 2018. The following USM were evaluated: choroid plexus cyst, thickened nuchal fold, absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, echogenic intracardiac focus, echogenic bowel, short long bones, and urinary tract dilation. Fetuses or children with known aneuploidy or a single gene disorder were excluded. Odds ratios (OR) of the association between CNV and USM were reported along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. P values <0.05 were considered significant.  Results: Of the 348 fetuses/children, 89 (25.6%) had a clinically relevant CNV. Similar percentages of demographic, delivery and neonate characteristics were noted for those with a clinically relevant CNV and those with a normal microarray analysis. No statistically significant differences were noted among those fetuses/children with a clinically relevant CNV and structural anomaly (p = 0.52; OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.72-1.92), presence of one USM (p = 0.72; OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.79-2.92), or presence of more than one USM (p = 0.79; OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.28-8.72).  Conclusion: Our data supports a lack of association between a clinically relevant copy number variant and an ultrasound-detected soft marker. A small statistically insignificant increase in odds of a clinically relevant CNV was noted for those fetuses/children with one or more USM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拷贝数变异和超声检测软标记物的回顾性研究
目的:探讨胎儿拷贝数变异(CNV)与超声检测软标记物(USM)的关系。方法:这项经irb批准的回顾性队列研究针对产前或产后进行染色体微阵列分析(CMA)的胎儿或儿童,旨在研究2010年1月至2018年7月在Geisinger分娩的妇女中临床相关CNV(归类为致病性CNV或不确定意义变异(VUS))与USM之间的关系。评估以下超声:脉络膜丛囊肿,颈褶增厚,鼻骨缺失或发育不全,心内灶回声,肠回声,短长骨和尿路扩张。已知非整倍体或单基因疾病的胎儿或儿童被排除在外。报告了CNV和USM之间的比值比(OR)以及相关的95%置信区间(CI)和p值。P值<0.05为显著性。结果:在348例胎儿/儿童中,89例(25.6%)具有临床相关的CNV。具有临床相关CNV的患者和具有正常微阵列分析的患者在人口统计学、分娩和新生儿特征方面的百分比相似。具有临床相关CNV和结构异常的胎儿/儿童间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.52;OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.72-1.92),存在1例USM (p = 0.72;OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.79-2.92),或存在一个以上USM (p = 0.79;或1.56,95% ci 0.28-8.72)。结论:我们的数据支持临床相关拷贝数变异与超声检测软标记物之间缺乏关联。有一种或多种USM的胎儿/儿童发生临床相关CNV的几率有统计学上不显著的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cell Systems Biology of Translation Factors and Proteasome-Targeted Protein Complexes Associated with AGC Kinase Sch 9 Molecular Linking of HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) and Tregs (Regulatory T- cells) in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer - A Review Editorial Note for Medicine Aspects Editorial Note for Genetic Aspects Disseminated Condensing Osteopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1