Related factors of quality of life among the public during the COVID-19 epidemic.

徐淑娴 綦斐 刘哲峰 施琳玲 吴一波 刘思彤
{"title":"Related factors of quality of life among the public during the COVID-19 epidemic.","authors":"徐淑娴 綦斐 刘哲峰 施琳玲 吴一波 刘思彤","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the quality of life and its related factors among the public during the COVID- 19 epidemic. Methods: A total of 2026 questionnaires were collected through wjx.cn (991 males, 1035 females). The12-item short form Health Survey (SF-12), Public Perception Survey of COVID-19 (COVID-PPS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) were implemented to evaluate the quality of life of the public, and multiple linear regression and structural equation model were used to analyze the related factors. Results: The median score of SF-12 was 65. 4(53. 9, 81. 1). According to the multiple linear regression, the SF-12 scores were positively associated with the scores of COVID-19 PSS, living in Northeastern China, being single and family per capital income more than 5000 yuan (β = 0. 05, 0. 04, 0. 04, 0. 06), and negatively associated with the scores of SAS and SDS, age of > 60 years, living in Central China, and with no formal education or primary education(β = -0. 31, -0. 30, -0. 08, -0. 04, -0. 07, -0. 04) . According to the structural equation model, COVID perception, scores of SAS and SDS were correlated with the SF-12 scores (λ= 0. 06, - 0. 33, - 0. 29). Conclusion: The quality of life of the public may be fairly good during COVID- 19. People who are over 60 years old, living in Central China, wi1h poor education background tend to have poorer life quality than other people. Anxiety and depression may negatively affect the life quality of the public. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 目的:探究新冠肺炎流行期间公众生活质量及相关因素。方法:使用问卷星收集有效问卷 2026 份[男 991 人,女 1035 人],采用 12 条目简短生命质量量表(SF-12)、自编公众对新冠肺炎的认知 调查问卷(COVID-PPS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS) 进 行评估,采用多重线性回归和结构方程模型探究生活质量的相关因素。结果:SF-12 中位得分为 65.4 (53.9,81.1)分。回归分析结果显示,COVID-PPS 得分、生活在东北地区、单身、家庭人均月收入 ≥ 5000 元与 SF-12 总分正向关联(β = 0.05、0.04、0.04、0.06);SAS 得分、SDS 得分、> 60 岁、生活在华 中地区、未接受过正规教育或受教育程度为小学与 SF-12 总分负向关联(β = -0.31、-0.30、-0.08、-0.04、-0.07、-0.04);结构方程模型显示,COVID-PPS、SAS、SDS 得分与 SF-12 总分存在相关(λ = 0.06、-0.33、-0.29)。结论:疫情下公众的生活质量处于中等偏上程度。60 岁以上,华中地区,受教 育程度低的人群生活质量更差,焦虑抑郁症状可能对公众的生活质量造成负面影响。 (Chinese) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)","PeriodicalId":10158,"journal":{"name":"中国心理卫生杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国心理卫生杂志","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.07.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the quality of life and its related factors among the public during the COVID- 19 epidemic. Methods: A total of 2026 questionnaires were collected through wjx.cn (991 males, 1035 females). The12-item short form Health Survey (SF-12), Public Perception Survey of COVID-19 (COVID-PPS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) were implemented to evaluate the quality of life of the public, and multiple linear regression and structural equation model were used to analyze the related factors. Results: The median score of SF-12 was 65. 4(53. 9, 81. 1). According to the multiple linear regression, the SF-12 scores were positively associated with the scores of COVID-19 PSS, living in Northeastern China, being single and family per capital income more than 5000 yuan (β = 0. 05, 0. 04, 0. 04, 0. 06), and negatively associated with the scores of SAS and SDS, age of > 60 years, living in Central China, and with no formal education or primary education(β = -0. 31, -0. 30, -0. 08, -0. 04, -0. 07, -0. 04) . According to the structural equation model, COVID perception, scores of SAS and SDS were correlated with the SF-12 scores (λ= 0. 06, - 0. 33, - 0. 29). Conclusion: The quality of life of the public may be fairly good during COVID- 19. People who are over 60 years old, living in Central China, wi1h poor education background tend to have poorer life quality than other people. Anxiety and depression may negatively affect the life quality of the public. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 目的:探究新冠肺炎流行期间公众生活质量及相关因素。方法:使用问卷星收集有效问卷 2026 份[男 991 人,女 1035 人],采用 12 条目简短生命质量量表(SF-12)、自编公众对新冠肺炎的认知 调查问卷(COVID-PPS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS) 进 行评估,采用多重线性回归和结构方程模型探究生活质量的相关因素。结果:SF-12 中位得分为 65.4 (53.9,81.1)分。回归分析结果显示,COVID-PPS 得分、生活在东北地区、单身、家庭人均月收入 ≥ 5000 元与 SF-12 总分正向关联(β = 0.05、0.04、0.04、0.06);SAS 得分、SDS 得分、> 60 岁、生活在华 中地区、未接受过正规教育或受教育程度为小学与 SF-12 总分负向关联(β = -0.31、-0.30、-0.08、-0.04、-0.07、-0.04);结构方程模型显示,COVID-PPS、SAS、SDS 得分与 SF-12 总分存在相关(λ = 0.06、-0.33、-0.29)。结论:疫情下公众的生活质量处于中等偏上程度。60 岁以上,华中地区,受教 育程度低的人群生活质量更差,焦虑抑郁症状可能对公众的生活质量造成负面影响。 (Chinese) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Chinese Mental Health Journal / Zhongguo Xinli Weisheng Zazhi is the property of Chinese Mental Health Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间公众生活质量相关因素分析
目的:了解新冠肺炎疫情期间公众的生活质量及其相关因素。方法:通过wjx.cn共收集问卷2026份,其中男性991份,女性1035份。采用12项健康问卷(SF-12)、新冠肺炎公众认知问卷(COVID-PPS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和感知社会支持量表(PSSS)评估公众生活质量,并采用多元线性回归和结构方程模型对相关因素进行分析。结果:SF-12评分中位数为65分。4(53。9日,81年。1).多元线性回归结果显示,SF-12得分与东北地区、单身、家庭人均收入超过5000元的COVID-19 PSS得分呈正相关(β = 0。05年,0。04, 0。04, 0。2006),且与SAS和SDS得分、年龄在50 ~ 60岁、居住在华中地区、未接受过正规教育或初等教育呈负相关(β = -0。31日,0。30日0。08年,0。04, 0。07年,0。04)。根据结构方程模型,COVID感知、SAS和SDS得分与SF-12得分呈显著相关(λ= 0)。06, - 0。33, - 0。29)。结论:新冠肺炎疫情期间公众的生活质量可能较好。60岁以上、生活在华中地区、教育背景较差的人,其生活质量往往比其他人差。焦虑和抑郁可能会对公众的生活质量产生负面影响。从作者(英文)[摘要]目的:探究新冠肺炎流行期间公众生活质量及相关因素。方法:使用问卷星收集有效问卷2026份(男991人,女1035人),采用12条目简短生命质量量表(SF-12),自编公众对新冠肺炎的认知调查问卷(COVID-PPS),焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS),领悟社会支持量表(pss)进行评估,采用多重线性回归和结构方程模型探究生活质量的相关因素。“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”回归分析结果显示,COVID-PPS得分,生活在东北地区,单身,家庭人均月收入≥5000元与SF-12总分正向关联(β= 0.05,0.04,0.04,0.06);SAS得分,SDS得分,> 60岁,生活在华中地区,未接受过正规教育或受教育程度为小学与SF-12总分负向关联(β= -0.31,-0.30,-0.08,-0.04,-0.07,-0.04);结构方程模型显示,COVID-PPS、SAS、SDS得分与SF-12总分存在相关(λ= 0.06,-0.33,-0.29)。结论:疫情下公众的生活质量处于中等偏上程度。60 岁以上,华中地区,受教 育程度低的人群生活质量更差,焦虑抑郁症状可能对公众的生活质量造成负面影响。 《中国精神卫生杂志》版权所有,未经著作权人明确书面许可,其内容不得复制、电邮至多个网站或在列表中发布。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这篇摘要可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参考资料的原始出版版本以获取完整摘要。(版权适用于所有摘要。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7602
期刊最新文献
A cross-lagged study on health risk perception and life consciousness in college students during the COVID-19 epidemic. Related factors of quality of life among the public during the COVID-19 epidemic. Mental health service demands among medical staff during the COVID-19 epidemic. A follow-up study on anxiety and emotional state of adult patients with COVID-19. Psychological crisis intervention in public health emergencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1