Philosophie et tradition dans le commentaire de Sforno sur Qohelet

Yod Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.4000/YOD.674
É. Dahan
{"title":"Philosophie et tradition dans le commentaire de Sforno sur Qohelet","authors":"É. Dahan","doi":"10.4000/YOD.674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to investigate how Rabbi Ovadia Sforno, the great Italian Biblical commentator of the Renaissance, deals with the Book of Qohelet. Indeed, Sforno is known not only as a rabbi, but also as a man interested in philosophy and sciences. My argument is that, if Sforno’s commentary on the Book of Qohelet is mainly philosophical, Jewish tradition is nevertheless widely present. In order to demonstrate this, I analyze the place of the two approaches–the philosophical-Aristotelian and the Jewish traditional–in this exegetical work.","PeriodicalId":53276,"journal":{"name":"Yod","volume":"1 1","pages":"145-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yod","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/YOD.674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate how Rabbi Ovadia Sforno, the great Italian Biblical commentator of the Renaissance, deals with the Book of Qohelet. Indeed, Sforno is known not only as a rabbi, but also as a man interested in philosophy and sciences. My argument is that, if Sforno’s commentary on the Book of Qohelet is mainly philosophical, Jewish tradition is nevertheless widely present. In order to demonstrate this, I analyze the place of the two approaches–the philosophical-Aristotelian and the Jewish traditional–in this exegetical work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sforno对Qohelet的评论中的哲学和传统
本文的目的是研究文艺复兴时期伟大的意大利圣经注释家拉比奥瓦迪亚·斯福诺是如何处理《小天使之书》的。事实上,斯福诺不仅是一位拉比,也是一位对哲学和科学感兴趣的人。我的观点是,如果斯福诺对《圣训》的评论主要是哲学性的,那么犹太传统仍然广泛存在。为了证明这一点,我分析了这两种方法——哲学的亚里士多德和犹太传统——在这部训诂著作中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yod
Yod
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
“ze davar shehu ktsat muzar [That’s a thing which is a bit strange]”:The |ze (copula) NP she‑Relative Clause|—Construction in Spoken Hebrew DiscourseDiscussion The Uncanny Meeting Point of Languages: Hebrew in G. Shofman and David Vogel’s Vienna Fautes de grammaire ou grammaire des fautes ? Or: Should Hebrew Speakers Be Afraid of Linguists? Bridge over Troubled Water: Spelling Accuracy of Novel Phonemes in Arabic among Native Hebrew‑Speaking Pupils in a Bilingual—Arabic‑Hebrew—Elementary School Léger comme le faon, fort comme un lion. Nouvelles considérations sur « La compétition des poètes » : la mise en abyme du poète dans le troisième conte (maḥberet) du Sefer ha‑meshalim de Yaakov?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1