Does transaction atmosphere influence the decision-making behaviour of investors?

Christa Hangl, Matthias Ortner
{"title":"Does transaction atmosphere influence the decision-making behaviour of investors?","authors":"Christa Hangl, Matthias Ortner","doi":"10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The profitability of impact investments ranges from a return on investment to market returns. To accomplish social goals, certain investors forgo part of the financial return. This approach opposes the concepts of conventional finance theory, which see the individual as a rational profit-maximizing decision-maker. A quantitative experimental study was conducted with students from the Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Steyr Campus, whereby the subjects were divided into two groups. A social Transaction Atmosphere (TA) was created in one group through the targeted use of stimuli. Subsequently, both groups had to make an investment decision in an identical scenario. The aim of the study and point of intersection between transaction cost theory and the social finance (SF)/impact investing (II) area is to analyse the observable \"irrationality\" in SF/II with reference to the transaction atmosphere as the primary decision-making element. The underlying scientific question investigates the impact of a socially shaped TA on the decision-making of investors. Experiment results demonstrated that the use of stimuli significantly raised the proportion of impact investments to overall investments. This finding suggests that a socially moulded TA is essential for investors' decision-making, whereby receptivity to the stimuli depends on individual investor characteristics, such as moral standard, financial knowledge, and previous experience with investment decisions. The financial aspect continues to play an important role in the decision- making process of investors.","PeriodicalId":37351,"journal":{"name":"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2022.11.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The profitability of impact investments ranges from a return on investment to market returns. To accomplish social goals, certain investors forgo part of the financial return. This approach opposes the concepts of conventional finance theory, which see the individual as a rational profit-maximizing decision-maker. A quantitative experimental study was conducted with students from the Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences, Steyr Campus, whereby the subjects were divided into two groups. A social Transaction Atmosphere (TA) was created in one group through the targeted use of stimuli. Subsequently, both groups had to make an investment decision in an identical scenario. The aim of the study and point of intersection between transaction cost theory and the social finance (SF)/impact investing (II) area is to analyse the observable "irrationality" in SF/II with reference to the transaction atmosphere as the primary decision-making element. The underlying scientific question investigates the impact of a socially shaped TA on the decision-making of investors. Experiment results demonstrated that the use of stimuli significantly raised the proportion of impact investments to overall investments. This finding suggests that a socially moulded TA is essential for investors' decision-making, whereby receptivity to the stimuli depends on individual investor characteristics, such as moral standard, financial knowledge, and previous experience with investment decisions. The financial aspect continues to play an important role in the decision- making process of investors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交易氛围是否影响投资者的决策行为?
影响力投资的盈利能力从投资回报到市场回报不等。为了实现社会目标,某些投资者放弃了部分财务回报。这种方法与传统金融理论的概念相反,传统金融理论将个人视为理性的利润最大化决策者。对来自上奥地利应用科学大学斯太尔校区的学生进行了定量实验研究,将受试者分为两组。通过有针对性地使用刺激,在一组中创造了社会交易氛围(TA)。随后,两组都必须在相同的场景下做出投资决策。交易成本理论与社会金融(SF)/影响投资(II)领域研究的目的和交叉点是,参考交易氛围作为主要决策因素,分析SF/II中可观察到的“非理性”。潜在的科学问题调查社会塑造的TA对投资者决策的影响。实验结果表明,刺激措施的使用显著提高了影响投资占总投资的比例。这一发现表明,社会塑造的TA对投资者的决策至关重要,因此对刺激的接受程度取决于投资者的个人特征,如道德标准、金融知识和以前的投资决策经验。财务方面继续在投资者的决策过程中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives
ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is special because it aims to provide an outlet for inter-disciplinary and more in-depth research papers with various methodological approaches from the broad fields of Finance, Risk and Accounting. The target group of this journal are academics who want to get a better understanding of the interconnectedness of their fields by acknowledging the methods and theories used in closely related areas. The JOFRP thus aims to overcome the self-imposed paradigmatic boundaries and reflexive isomorphisms of the individual, typically rather narrow fields and invites new and combined perspectives from the fields of Finance, Risk and Accounting. Despite its methodological, topical and disciplinary openness - it does so with a strong focus on academic rigour and robustness. Articles can vary in size and approaches but all articles will be strictly double-blind peer reviewed and authors are frequently invited to discuss the ramifications of their articles in the global FRAP and SSFII conferences.
期刊最新文献
The role of forensic auditing techniques in preventing non-government organisations’ financial statement fraud in South Africa using a proactive approach Currency Momentum: An Emerging Market Issue? Does ERM Sophistication Drive IPO Initial Performance in Emerging Market? Evidence from Malaysian Market Does IFRS 7 Disclosure Weaken Earnings Management? Evidence from Indonesian Conventional Commercial Banks A comparison of market risk measures from a twofold perspective: accurate and loss function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1