Prognostic significance of non-thyroidal illness syndrome in sepsis and septic shock cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.35975/apic.v26i1.1768
Rio Wironegoro, Nabila A Kloping, A. P. Witarto, David Nugraha, Niwanda Yogiswara, Kevin Luke, Y. Kloping, Maulydia Maulydia, S. Adi
{"title":"Prognostic significance of non-thyroidal illness syndrome in sepsis and septic shock cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rio Wironegoro, Nabila A Kloping, A. P. Witarto, David Nugraha, Niwanda Yogiswara, Kevin Luke, Y. Kloping, Maulydia Maulydia, S. Adi","doi":"10.35975/apic.v26i1.1768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to assess non-thyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS) as a prognostic determinant in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock by evaluating thyroid hormone (TH) levels. Methodology: A systematic search was performed through electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Medline. Following medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms: \"euthyroid sick syndrome\" or \"Euthyroid Sick Syndromes\" or \"non–thyroidal illness syndrome\" or \"non–thyroidal illness syndrome\" or \"sick euthyroid syndrome\" or \"low T3 syndrome\" or \"low tri-iodothyronine syndrome\" AND \"sepsis\" or \"septic shock\" or \"systemic inflammatory response syndrome\" or \"septicemia\" or \"bacteremia\". Boolean operators’ combinations were applied to broaden and narrow the search results. Investigators independently reviewed the search results. For the purpose of the meta-analysis each thyroid hormone level was converted into the same unit: nmol/L for T3, T4 and rT3; μIU/mL for TSH; and pmol/L for fT3 and fT4. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. Results: A total of 843 patients from 9 studies were included in this analysis. In septic patients, the lowest effect size of thyroid function parameter was TSH (g = 2.05; 95% CI = 1.56-2.54), while T3, fT3, and fT4 had the lowest effect size in severe septic patients (g [95%CI]: 0.83 [0.22-1.44]; 1.92 [0.57-3.27]; 1.00 [0.87-1.13]). Patients with septic shock had the highest effect size of TSH (g = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.54-2.61) and fT4 (g = 9.26; 95% CI = 0.98-17.53). Meanwhile, the lowest was T4 (g = 65.60; 95% CI = 64.63-66.57) and rT3 (g = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.24-0.34). A lower effect size of T3 (g = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.76-0.91), T4 (g = 59.48; 95% CI = 57.92-61.04), fT3 (g = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.83-2.66), and fT4 (g = 9.19; 95% CI = 1.56-16.81) were found in non-survivor groups. Conclusion: Thyroid hormone levels differ according to the severity of sepsis in septic patients. Non-thyroidal illness syndrome is a prognostic factor in septic patients and is associated with the risk of the mortality. Abbreviations: ESS - Euthyroid Sick Syndrome; NTIS - Non-Thyroidal Illness Syndrome; Tg - Thyroglobulin Key words: Non-thyroidal illness syndrome; Euthyroid sick syndrome; Sepsis; Septic shock; Prognosis Citation: Wironegoro R, Kloping NA, Witarto AP, Nugraha D, Yogiswara N, Luke K, KlopingYP, Maulydia M, Adi S. Prognostic significance of non-thyroidal illness syndrome in sepsis and septic shock cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):54-62. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1768 Received: July 16, 2021, Reviewed: December 15, 2021, Accepted: December 28, 2021","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i1.1768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess non-thyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS) as a prognostic determinant in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock by evaluating thyroid hormone (TH) levels. Methodology: A systematic search was performed through electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Medline. Following medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms: "euthyroid sick syndrome" or "Euthyroid Sick Syndromes" or "non–thyroidal illness syndrome" or "non–thyroidal illness syndrome" or "sick euthyroid syndrome" or "low T3 syndrome" or "low tri-iodothyronine syndrome" AND "sepsis" or "septic shock" or "systemic inflammatory response syndrome" or "septicemia" or "bacteremia". Boolean operators’ combinations were applied to broaden and narrow the search results. Investigators independently reviewed the search results. For the purpose of the meta-analysis each thyroid hormone level was converted into the same unit: nmol/L for T3, T4 and rT3; μIU/mL for TSH; and pmol/L for fT3 and fT4. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. Results: A total of 843 patients from 9 studies were included in this analysis. In septic patients, the lowest effect size of thyroid function parameter was TSH (g = 2.05; 95% CI = 1.56-2.54), while T3, fT3, and fT4 had the lowest effect size in severe septic patients (g [95%CI]: 0.83 [0.22-1.44]; 1.92 [0.57-3.27]; 1.00 [0.87-1.13]). Patients with septic shock had the highest effect size of TSH (g = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.54-2.61) and fT4 (g = 9.26; 95% CI = 0.98-17.53). Meanwhile, the lowest was T4 (g = 65.60; 95% CI = 64.63-66.57) and rT3 (g = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.24-0.34). A lower effect size of T3 (g = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.76-0.91), T4 (g = 59.48; 95% CI = 57.92-61.04), fT3 (g = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.83-2.66), and fT4 (g = 9.19; 95% CI = 1.56-16.81) were found in non-survivor groups. Conclusion: Thyroid hormone levels differ according to the severity of sepsis in septic patients. Non-thyroidal illness syndrome is a prognostic factor in septic patients and is associated with the risk of the mortality. Abbreviations: ESS - Euthyroid Sick Syndrome; NTIS - Non-Thyroidal Illness Syndrome; Tg - Thyroglobulin Key words: Non-thyroidal illness syndrome; Euthyroid sick syndrome; Sepsis; Septic shock; Prognosis Citation: Wironegoro R, Kloping NA, Witarto AP, Nugraha D, Yogiswara N, Luke K, KlopingYP, Maulydia M, Adi S. Prognostic significance of non-thyroidal illness syndrome in sepsis and septic shock cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;26(1):54-62. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i1.1768 Received: July 16, 2021, Reviewed: December 15, 2021, Accepted: December 28, 2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非甲状腺疾病综合征在脓毒症和感染性休克病例中的预后意义:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:本研究旨在通过评估甲状腺激素(TH)水平来评估非甲状腺疾病综合征(NTIS)作为脓毒症、严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者预后的决定因素。方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Medline等电子数据库进行系统检索。以下医学主题标题(MeSH)和自由文本术语:“甲状腺功能正常综合征”或“甲状腺功能正常综合征”或“非甲状腺疾病综合征”或“非甲状腺疾病综合征”或“甲状腺功能正常综合征”或“低T3综合征”或“低三碘甲状腺原氨酸综合征”和“败血症”或“感染性休克”或“全身炎症反应综合征”或“败血症”或“菌血症”。使用布尔运算符组合来扩大和缩小搜索结果。调查人员独立审查了搜索结果。为了进行荟萃分析,每个甲状腺激素水平被转换为相同的单位:T3、T4和rT3的nmol/L;TSH μIU/mL;fT3和fT4的pmol/L。采用Stata Statistical Software: Release 16进行统计分析。结果:来自9项研究的843名患者被纳入本分析。脓毒症患者甲状腺功能参数效应值最低的是TSH (g = 2.05;95%CI = 1.56-2.54),而T3、fT3和fT4在严重脓毒症患者中的效应量最低(g [95%CI]: 0.83 [0.22-1.44];1.92 (0.57 - -3.27);1.00(0.87 - -1.13))。脓毒性休克患者TSH效应值最高(g = 2.08;95% CI = 1.54-2.61)和fT4 (g = 9.26;95% ci = 0.98-17.53)。T4最低(g = 65.60;95% CI = 64.63-66.57)和rT3 (g = 0.29;95% ci = 0.24-0.34)。T3的效应量较低(g = 0.83;95% CI = 0.76-0.91), T4 (g = 59.48;95% CI = 57.92-61.04), fT3 (g = 2.25;95% CI = 1.83-2.66), fT4 (g = 9.19;95% CI = 1.56-16.81)。结论:脓毒症患者甲状腺激素水平随脓毒症严重程度不同而不同。非甲状腺疾病综合征是脓毒症患者的预后因素,与死亡风险相关。缩写:ESS -甲状腺功能亢进综合征;NTIS—非甲状腺疾病综合征;关键词:非甲状腺疾病综合征;甲状腺功能亢进综合征;脓毒症;脓毒性休克;预后引文:Wironegoro R, Kloping NA, Witarto AP, Nugraha D, Yogiswara N, Luke K, KlopingYP, Maulydia M, Adi S.非甲状腺疾病综合征在脓毒症和感染性休克病例中的预后意义:系统回顾和meta分析。Anaesth。疼痛重症监护2021;26(1):54-62。收稿日期:2021年7月16日,审稿日期:2021年12月15日,录用日期:2021年12月28日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
NSAIDs in COVID-19, friend or foe? Post cervical spine surgery hyperpyrexia (108?F) in a patient with COVID-19: a case report Extreme physical exhaustion leading to hypokalemic periodic paralysis- a case report Difficult airway management in Apert syndrome for maxillofacial reconstruction: a case report Anesthesia without opioids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1