A Numerical Study of Different Types of Collimators for a High-Resolution Preclinical CdTe Pixelated Semiconductor SPECT System

Q Physics and Astronomy Journal of the Optical Society of Korea Pub Date : 2016-12-25 DOI:10.3807/JOSK.2016.20.6.663
Hyun-Woo Jeong, Jong Seok Kim, S. Bae, Kanghyen Seo, Seung Hun Kim, S. Kang, Dong Jin Shin, Chang-Lae Lee, Kyuseok Kim, Youngjin Lee
{"title":"A Numerical Study of Different Types of Collimators for a High-Resolution Preclinical CdTe Pixelated Semiconductor SPECT System","authors":"Hyun-Woo Jeong, Jong Seok Kim, S. Bae, Kanghyen Seo, Seung Hun Kim, S. Kang, Dong Jin Shin, Chang-Lae Lee, Kyuseok Kim, Youngjin Lee","doi":"10.3807/JOSK.2016.20.6.663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) with a pixelated semiconductor detector (PSD), not only pinhole collimators but also parallel-hole collimators are often used in preclinical nuclear-medicine imaging systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare pinhole and parallel-hole collimators in a PSD. For that purpose, we paired a PID 350 (Ajat Oy Ltd., Finland) CdTe PSD with each of the four collimators most frequently used in preclinical nuclear medicine: (1) a pinhole collimator, and (2) low-energy high-resolution (LEHR), (3) low-energy general-purpose (LEGP), and (4) low-energy high-sensitivity (LEHS) parallel-hole collimators. The sensitivity and spatial resolution of each collimator was evaluated using a point source and a hot-rod phantom. The highest sensitivity was achieved using LEHS, followed by LEGP, LEHR, and pinhole. Also, at a source-to-collimator distance of 2 cm, the spatial resolution was 1.63, 2.05, 2.79, and 3.45 mm using pinhole, LEHR, LEGP, and LEHS, respectively. The reconstructed hot-rod phantom images showed that the pinhole collimator and the LEHR parallel-hole collimator give a fine spatial resolution for preclinical SPECT with PSD. In conclusion, we successfully compared different types of collimators for a preclinical pixelated semiconductor SPECT system.","PeriodicalId":49986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Optical Society of Korea","volume":"20 1","pages":"663-668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Optical Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2016.20.6.663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) with a pixelated semiconductor detector (PSD), not only pinhole collimators but also parallel-hole collimators are often used in preclinical nuclear-medicine imaging systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare pinhole and parallel-hole collimators in a PSD. For that purpose, we paired a PID 350 (Ajat Oy Ltd., Finland) CdTe PSD with each of the four collimators most frequently used in preclinical nuclear medicine: (1) a pinhole collimator, and (2) low-energy high-resolution (LEHR), (3) low-energy general-purpose (LEGP), and (4) low-energy high-sensitivity (LEHS) parallel-hole collimators. The sensitivity and spatial resolution of each collimator was evaluated using a point source and a hot-rod phantom. The highest sensitivity was achieved using LEHS, followed by LEGP, LEHR, and pinhole. Also, at a source-to-collimator distance of 2 cm, the spatial resolution was 1.63, 2.05, 2.79, and 3.45 mm using pinhole, LEHR, LEGP, and LEHS, respectively. The reconstructed hot-rod phantom images showed that the pinhole collimator and the LEHR parallel-hole collimator give a fine spatial resolution for preclinical SPECT with PSD. In conclusion, we successfully compared different types of collimators for a preclinical pixelated semiconductor SPECT system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高分辨率CdTe像素化半导体SPECT系统中不同类型准直器的数值研究
在具有像素化半导体探测器(PSD)的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)中,除了针孔准直器外,平行孔准直器也经常用于临床前核医学成像系统。本研究的目的是评估和比较针孔和平行孔准直器在PSD。为此,我们将PID 350 (Ajat Oy Ltd., Finland) CdTe PSD与临床前核医学中最常用的四种准直器配对:(1)针孔准直器,(2)低能量高分辨率(LEHR),(3)低能量通用(LEGP)和(4)低能量高灵敏度(LEHS)平行孔准直器。每个准直器的灵敏度和空间分辨率进行了评估,使用一个点源和一个热杆幻影。LEHS灵敏度最高,其次是LEGP、LEHR和针孔。在源准直距离为2 cm时,采用针孔、LEHR、LEGP和LEHS的空间分辨率分别为1.63、2.05、2.79和3.45 mm。重建的热棒幻影图像表明,针孔准直器和LEHR平行孔准直器为临床前PSD SPECT提供了良好的空间分辨率。总之,我们成功地比较了不同类型的准直器用于临床前像素化半导体SPECT系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊最新文献
A Numerical Study of Different Types of Collimators for a High-Resolution Preclinical CdTe Pixelated Semiconductor SPECT System Dynamic Modulation Transfer Function Analysis of Images Blurred by Sinusoidal Vibration Methods and Systems for High-temperature Strain Measurement of the Main Steam Pipe of a Boiler of a Power Plant While in Service Simulation for Small Lamellar Grating FTIR Spectrometer for Passive Remote Sensing A Novel Optical High-Availability Seamless Redundancy (OHSR) Design Based on Beam Splitting / Combining Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1