{"title":"Restoration sites on the Californian coast have different ecological histories that can influence restoration success","authors":"E. Buisson, T. Dutoit","doi":"10.3406/ecmed.2022.2139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For each restoration project, it is essential to define a reference ecosystem towards which ecological restoration aims. Historical information may be useful in the construction of the reference model and in finding out about the type and degree of disturbances that have caused degradation on the site, as legacies of past human land-uses have been shown to be major determinants of vegetation and plant diversity even in the very long term. The aim of this paper is the retrace the history of three sites where restoration protocols were tested, to better apprehend the potential reference ecosystems as well as the disturbances that degraded them. To do so, we first compiled information on the reference ecosystems at the landscape scale. Then, we compiled historical and agricultural information at the scale of the sites from local historical documents, historical reviews and aerial photographs. The three sites most likely were grasslands or oak savannas before European settlement. Grasslands used to cover 8.9 million ha in California. They were species-rich grasslands managed with fire by the native people and grazed by native ungulates. Early settlers introduced cattle grazing and changed fire regimes. Later on, many grasslands were converted to cultivation. All three sites were used for ranching and sometimes overgrazed. At least two of them were cultivated, probably leading to restoration being harder there, as plowing eliminates perennial species, destroys the seedbank, changes soil characteristics.","PeriodicalId":37547,"journal":{"name":"Ecologia Mediterranea","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologia Mediterranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2022.2139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For each restoration project, it is essential to define a reference ecosystem towards which ecological restoration aims. Historical information may be useful in the construction of the reference model and in finding out about the type and degree of disturbances that have caused degradation on the site, as legacies of past human land-uses have been shown to be major determinants of vegetation and plant diversity even in the very long term. The aim of this paper is the retrace the history of three sites where restoration protocols were tested, to better apprehend the potential reference ecosystems as well as the disturbances that degraded them. To do so, we first compiled information on the reference ecosystems at the landscape scale. Then, we compiled historical and agricultural information at the scale of the sites from local historical documents, historical reviews and aerial photographs. The three sites most likely were grasslands or oak savannas before European settlement. Grasslands used to cover 8.9 million ha in California. They were species-rich grasslands managed with fire by the native people and grazed by native ungulates. Early settlers introduced cattle grazing and changed fire regimes. Later on, many grasslands were converted to cultivation. All three sites were used for ranching and sometimes overgrazed. At least two of them were cultivated, probably leading to restoration being harder there, as plowing eliminates perennial species, destroys the seedbank, changes soil characteristics.
期刊介绍:
ecologia mediterranea publie des articles de recherche originaux sur des sujets se rapportant à l’écologie fondamentale ou appliquée des régions méditerranéennes. La revue exclut les articles purement descriptifs ou de systématique. ecologia mediterranea peut publier des études plus descriptives si elles apportent des connaissances approfondies d’intérêt général pour les écologues. ecologia mediterranea privilégie les domaines scientifiques suivants : bioclimatologie, biogéographie, biologie de la conservation, biologie marine, biologie des populations, écologie des communautés, écologie forestière, écologie génétique, écologie marine, écologie microbienne, écologie du paysage, écologie de la restauration, écologie végétale et animale, écophysiologie, paléoclimatologie, paléoécologie. La revue accepte également des articles de synthèse, des notes / communications courtes, des comptes-rendus d’ouvrages, des résumés de thèse, ainsi que des commentaires sur les articles récemment parus dans ecologia mediterranea . La revue publie aussi des actes de colloques faisant l’objet d’un numéro spécial. Dans ce cas, prendre contact avec les éditrices.