From Saliva to Faeces and Everything in Between: A Guide to Biochemical Analysis Using Animal Samples for Biomarker Detection

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3819/ccbr.2021.160002
S. Clegg, S. Millson
{"title":"From Saliva to Faeces and Everything in Between: A Guide to Biochemical Analysis Using Animal Samples for Biomarker Detection","authors":"S. Clegg, S. Millson","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2021.160002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, interest in the emotional states and stress levels of animals has grown. These emotional states can have secondary effects for owners; for example, if an animal becomes aggressive, this can lead to relinquishment or even euthanasia. In addition, long-term stressful situations can have serious health impacts on animals and can affect meat quality in livestock. A variety of methods can be used to investigate biomarkers in animals, and many sample types can be taken to facilitate this. The choice of assay will often depend on the animal under investigation and practicalities of obtaining the sample. The assay choice can also be dependent on testing conditions such as the field versus laboratory, samples taken, costs, and the desired results. There is also the question of the timescales of the investigated response: Do you want to test what happened over the last month? Last week? Yesterday? Or within the last hour? This review highlights some of the pros and cons of the different samples and the different methods for biomarker analysis in animals. Studies can be made or broken based on the type of samples taken, and what aspects are to be investigated, and this simple decision can make a world of difference to the results of an investigation. Careful planning and thought before starting a study can make the difference between a scientific breakthrough with animal welfare and husbandry implications and poor results that are of little use to man or beast. DOI:10.3819/CCBR.2021.160002 Volume 16, 2021","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2021.160002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the last decade, interest in the emotional states and stress levels of animals has grown. These emotional states can have secondary effects for owners; for example, if an animal becomes aggressive, this can lead to relinquishment or even euthanasia. In addition, long-term stressful situations can have serious health impacts on animals and can affect meat quality in livestock. A variety of methods can be used to investigate biomarkers in animals, and many sample types can be taken to facilitate this. The choice of assay will often depend on the animal under investigation and practicalities of obtaining the sample. The assay choice can also be dependent on testing conditions such as the field versus laboratory, samples taken, costs, and the desired results. There is also the question of the timescales of the investigated response: Do you want to test what happened over the last month? Last week? Yesterday? Or within the last hour? This review highlights some of the pros and cons of the different samples and the different methods for biomarker analysis in animals. Studies can be made or broken based on the type of samples taken, and what aspects are to be investigated, and this simple decision can make a world of difference to the results of an investigation. Careful planning and thought before starting a study can make the difference between a scientific breakthrough with animal welfare and husbandry implications and poor results that are of little use to man or beast. DOI:10.3819/CCBR.2021.160002 Volume 16, 2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
从唾液到粪便和介于两者之间的一切:使用动物样本进行生物标志物检测的生化分析指南
在过去的十年里,人们对动物的情绪状态和压力水平越来越感兴趣。这些情绪状态会对主人产生二次影响;例如,如果一只动物变得有攻击性,这可能导致放弃甚至安乐死。此外,长期的压力环境会对动物的健康产生严重影响,并会影响牲畜的肉质。多种方法可用于研究动物中的生物标志物,并且可以采取许多样品类型来促进这一点。测定方法的选择通常取决于所研究的动物和获得样品的实用性。测定方法的选择也可以取决于测试条件,如现场与实验室、所取样品、成本和期望的结果。还有一个问题是调查反应的时间尺度:你想测试上个月发生了什么吗?上周吗?昨天吗?还是在过去一小时内?本文综述了不同样品和不同动物生物标志物分析方法的优缺点。研究可以根据样本的类型和要调查的方面来进行或中断,这个简单的决定可以对调查结果产生很大的影响。在开始一项研究之前进行仔细的计划和思考,可能会导致科学突破与动物福利和畜牧业的关系,以及对人类或动物没有多大用处的糟糕结果。DOI:10.3819/CCBR.2021.160002卷16,2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1