Conservatives and Gamblers: Interpreting plant functional response to water stress in terms of a single indicator

IF 0.2 Q4 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Ideas in Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2015-07-02 DOI:10.4033/IEE.2015.8.5.N
Martin Kazmierczak, K. Johst, A. Huth
{"title":"Conservatives and Gamblers: Interpreting plant functional response to water stress in terms of a single indicator","authors":"Martin Kazmierczak, K. Johst, A. Huth","doi":"10.4033/IEE.2015.8.5.N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water availability has a decisive impact on plant growth, survival and distribution. Climate change is expected to alter both the amount and variability of precipitation. To predict and understand plant responses to water stress, efficient and robust mechanisms for describing their functional responses to water availability are needed. However, most ecohydrological processes and models which take into account these responses are inherently complex, difficult to understand and require large amounts of data. We develop a novel straightforward approach and hypothesize that: (1) Plants exhibit two archetypical response patterns under water stress, one typical to slow-growing plants and one typical to fast-growing ones, with most plants being situated between these two. (2) Differences within and between these functional types can be adequately described by a single parameter - the threshold of relative soil water content - at which plants reduce their transpiration in response to water stress. This indicator is straightforward and relies on data which is relatively easy to measure. Its effect has been previously described and it is already used in several models to simulate the effect of water stress on plants. In our approach, we combine this indicator with a description of reactions patterns. This combination provides a general and efficient way of classifying plant responses and allows the assessment of the impact of water stress on a wide variety of plants. Due to its simplicity, our approach offers the opportunity to include water relations of plants in a larger set of models and descriptions than it is possible with more complex ecohydrological descriptions. It also can be used to explain biodiversity in fluctuating environments.","PeriodicalId":42755,"journal":{"name":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4033/IEE.2015.8.5.N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water availability has a decisive impact on plant growth, survival and distribution. Climate change is expected to alter both the amount and variability of precipitation. To predict and understand plant responses to water stress, efficient and robust mechanisms for describing their functional responses to water availability are needed. However, most ecohydrological processes and models which take into account these responses are inherently complex, difficult to understand and require large amounts of data. We develop a novel straightforward approach and hypothesize that: (1) Plants exhibit two archetypical response patterns under water stress, one typical to slow-growing plants and one typical to fast-growing ones, with most plants being situated between these two. (2) Differences within and between these functional types can be adequately described by a single parameter - the threshold of relative soil water content - at which plants reduce their transpiration in response to water stress. This indicator is straightforward and relies on data which is relatively easy to measure. Its effect has been previously described and it is already used in several models to simulate the effect of water stress on plants. In our approach, we combine this indicator with a description of reactions patterns. This combination provides a general and efficient way of classifying plant responses and allows the assessment of the impact of water stress on a wide variety of plants. Due to its simplicity, our approach offers the opportunity to include water relations of plants in a larger set of models and descriptions than it is possible with more complex ecohydrological descriptions. It also can be used to explain biodiversity in fluctuating environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保守主义者和赌徒:用单一指标解释植物对水分胁迫的功能反应
水分的有效性对植物的生长、生存和分布具有决定性的影响。预计气候变化将改变降水的数量和变率。为了预测和理解植物对水分胁迫的反应,需要有效和可靠的机制来描述它们对水分可用性的功能反应。然而,考虑到这些响应的大多数生态水文过程和模型本质上是复杂的,难以理解的,并且需要大量的数据。我们提出了一种新的直接方法,并假设:(1)植物在水分胁迫下表现出两种典型的响应模式,一种是对慢生长植物的典型响应模式,一种是对快速生长植物的典型响应模式,大多数植物处于这两种模式之间。(2)这些功能类型内部和之间的差异可以用一个参数-相对土壤含水量阈值-来充分描述,在这个参数下,植物会减少蒸腾以响应水分胁迫。这个指标很直接,依赖于相对容易测量的数据。它的影响以前已经被描述过,并且已经在几个模型中用于模拟水分胁迫对植物的影响。在我们的方法中,我们将这个指标与反应模式的描述结合起来。这种组合提供了一种对植物反应进行分类的通用而有效的方法,并允许评估水分胁迫对各种植物的影响。由于其简单性,我们的方法提供了在更大的模型和描述集中包括植物的水关系的机会,而不是更复杂的生态水文描述。它也可以用来解释波动环境中的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
Ideas in Ecology and Evolution EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond individual, population, and community: Considering information, cell number, and energy flux as fundamental dimensions of life across scales Eccrine Hydration Screen adaptation theory for humans Investing in publication: Researchers as "savage capitalists" Transformative choices towards a sustainable academic publishing system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1