Comparison of Classical Laminectomy and Transspinous- Split Laminectomy Techniques

S. Kitiş, Seythanoglu Mh, M. G. Papaker, S. Cevk, E. Emel
{"title":"Comparison of Classical Laminectomy and Transspinous- Split Laminectomy Techniques","authors":"S. Kitiş, Seythanoglu Mh, M. G. Papaker, S. Cevk, E. Emel","doi":"10.4172/2325-9701.1000250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of study is to compare clinical and radiological results of classical laminectomy and transspinous-split laminectomy which provides vertebral alignment and eliminates paraspinal muscle damage. Methods: Twenty patients in each group were evaluated (Total 40 patients). We analyzed oswestry scale, visual analog scale, pain score, and narcotic score of the patients. To demonstrate the damage of paraspinal muscles between two procedures, preoperative and postoperative MR images are compared and the ratio of atrophy was measured. Also incision size, volume of hemorrhage, bed time was evaluated. Results: Decrease of these oswestry scale, visual analog scale, pain score, and narcotic score values after transspinous-split laminectomy were found more than the decrease of those after classic laminectomy. Also, when we analyzed the responses of the patients to walking part of oswestry scale, we observed an important difference in favor of transspinous-split laminectomy group. Preoperative and postoperative MR images show that paraspinal muscle atrophy is less in transspinous-split laminectomy procedure. Hence, at these postoperative assessments, a significant difference in favor of transspinous-split laminectomy was determined. Conclusion: This study has showed that, transspinous-split laminectomy is a good alternative to classical laminectomy and minimal invasive technique by decreasing postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":90240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of study is to compare clinical and radiological results of classical laminectomy and transspinous-split laminectomy which provides vertebral alignment and eliminates paraspinal muscle damage. Methods: Twenty patients in each group were evaluated (Total 40 patients). We analyzed oswestry scale, visual analog scale, pain score, and narcotic score of the patients. To demonstrate the damage of paraspinal muscles between two procedures, preoperative and postoperative MR images are compared and the ratio of atrophy was measured. Also incision size, volume of hemorrhage, bed time was evaluated. Results: Decrease of these oswestry scale, visual analog scale, pain score, and narcotic score values after transspinous-split laminectomy were found more than the decrease of those after classic laminectomy. Also, when we analyzed the responses of the patients to walking part of oswestry scale, we observed an important difference in favor of transspinous-split laminectomy group. Preoperative and postoperative MR images show that paraspinal muscle atrophy is less in transspinous-split laminectomy procedure. Hence, at these postoperative assessments, a significant difference in favor of transspinous-split laminectomy was determined. Conclusion: This study has showed that, transspinous-split laminectomy is a good alternative to classical laminectomy and minimal invasive technique by decreasing postoperative complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经典椎板切除术与经棘裂椎板切除术的比较
目的:比较经典椎板切除术和经棘裂椎板切除术的临床和影像学结果,经棘裂椎板切除术提供椎体对齐并消除棘旁肌损伤。方法:每组20例,共40例。分析患者的睡眠评分、视觉模拟评分、疼痛评分和麻醉评分。为了证明两种手术对棘旁肌的损伤,我们比较了术前和术后的MR图像,并测量了萎缩的比例。同时评估切口大小、出血量、卧床时间。结果:经棘裂椎板切除术后的睡眠评分、视觉模拟评分、疼痛评分和麻醉评分值的下降幅度大于经典椎板切除术后的下降幅度。此外,当我们分析患者对步行部分oswestry量表的反应时,我们观察到经棘裂椎板切除术组有重要差异。术前和术后MR图像显示经棘裂椎板切除术中棘旁肌萎缩较少。因此,在这些术后评估中,确定了支持经棘裂椎板切除术的显著差异。结论:经棘裂椎板切除术可减少术后并发症,是传统椎板切除术和微创手术的较好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myelopathy’s Worsening Due to Adjacent Peroperative Discal Herniatio: Case Report. One-Year NDI and VAS Outcomes from the Single-Level PEEK-on-Ceramic SimplifyTM Disc FDA IDE Trial Spinal Epidermoid Tumor – A Rare and Silent Occurrence Early Clinical Outcomes Comparing Porous PEEK, Smooth PEEK, and Structural Allograft Interbody Devices for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Spontaneous C1 Anterior Arch Fracture Following C1 Laminectomy for Cervical Meningioma: A Case Report and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1