Ethics: Employer-Sponsored Wellness Programs for Nurses: The Ethics of Carrots and Sticks.

Jeanne Merkle Sorrell
{"title":"Ethics: Employer-Sponsored Wellness Programs for Nurses: The Ethics of Carrots and Sticks.","authors":"Jeanne Merkle Sorrell","doi":"10.3912/OJIN.VOL20NO01ETHCOL01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has demonstrated that job stress and shiftwork, both of which nurses often experience, are risk factors for obesity. Zhao and Turner (2008) carried out a systematic review of studies focused on shift workers' lifestyle. Findings from the 17 studies reviewed by the authors suggested that shift workers, as compared to non-shiftworkers, were more likely to be overweight, have adverse lifestyle behaviors, and eat less healthfully. In another study, a sample of 194 nurses from six hospitals participated in anthropometric measurements and self-administered surveys (Malik. Blake. & Batt. 2011), Results of the study showed that a majority of nurses were overweight and that their self-reported health, diet, and physical activity ratings were low. As researchers continue to find relationships between obesity and chronic illnesses and also the negative impact of unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise on health, employers are considering new ways to help ensure a healthy work environment.In 2011, the Surgeon General recommended a focus on Creating Healthy Worksites to make it easier for employees to participate in exercise programs and make nutritious food choices (Corporate Fitness Works. 2011 ). There are increasing numbers of employer-sponsored wellness programs that are designed to contain rising healthcare costs by encouraging healthy behaviors (Lessack. 20131. Behaviors that are targeted most frequently by wellness programs are exercise, smoking, and weight loss (Muitaba &Cavico, 2013). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has allowed companies to provide financial incentives to employees for healthy behaviors (Berman. 2013: Madison. VoIpp. & Haloern. 2011). ACA regulations distinguish between participatory and health-contingent wellness programs. Participatory wellness programs do not require employees to satisfy any particular standard, such as joining a gym or participating in a smoking-cessation program, in order to receive a reward. Health-contingent wellness programs require employees to perform specific activities related to a health factor or to achieve a specific health outcome in order to receive a reward (Lessack. 2013J.In theory, the primary ethical justification for employer-sponsored wellness programs is beneficence - the moral obligation to act for the benefit of others (Rothstein & Harrell, 2009). These programs appear to be a win-win situation: employees have opportunities to be healthier and save on healthcare costs, and employers can benefit from a more productive and healthier workforce (Voigt & Schmidt. 2013)In spite of these advantages, however, implementation of these programs has raised some ethical concerns. The model of beneficence that is integrated by employee-sponsored wellness programs tends to be paternalistic, with health plans designed for economic leverage to encourage employees to adopt the type of healthy lifestyle activities selected by the specific health plan (Rothstein & Harrell. 2009). Privacy for employees is another concern, as coaches and others carrying out the programs collect sensitive health information about employee participants. There are risks of this information being stolen, as well as concerns with employee autonomy (Berman. 2013). In addition, there are concerns about potential discrimination of unhealthy employees that may occur if the incentive programs result in discouraging unhealthy job applicants, encouraging unhealthy employees to resign, or discouraging them from taking advantage of health benefit packages offered by the institution (Madison. VoIpp. & Halpern. 2011). As increasing numbers and types of employer-sponsored healthy lifestyle programs increase, the question arises: At what point are incentives to participate or penalties for nonparticipation so great as to render participation in the program involuntary (Lessack. 2013)? Both the carrot (rewards) and stick (penalties) approaches to employee-sponsored healthy lifestyle program may raise some ethical concerns. …","PeriodicalId":35614,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.VOL20NO01ETHCOL01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that job stress and shiftwork, both of which nurses often experience, are risk factors for obesity. Zhao and Turner (2008) carried out a systematic review of studies focused on shift workers' lifestyle. Findings from the 17 studies reviewed by the authors suggested that shift workers, as compared to non-shiftworkers, were more likely to be overweight, have adverse lifestyle behaviors, and eat less healthfully. In another study, a sample of 194 nurses from six hospitals participated in anthropometric measurements and self-administered surveys (Malik. Blake. & Batt. 2011), Results of the study showed that a majority of nurses were overweight and that their self-reported health, diet, and physical activity ratings were low. As researchers continue to find relationships between obesity and chronic illnesses and also the negative impact of unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise on health, employers are considering new ways to help ensure a healthy work environment.In 2011, the Surgeon General recommended a focus on Creating Healthy Worksites to make it easier for employees to participate in exercise programs and make nutritious food choices (Corporate Fitness Works. 2011 ). There are increasing numbers of employer-sponsored wellness programs that are designed to contain rising healthcare costs by encouraging healthy behaviors (Lessack. 20131. Behaviors that are targeted most frequently by wellness programs are exercise, smoking, and weight loss (Muitaba &Cavico, 2013). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has allowed companies to provide financial incentives to employees for healthy behaviors (Berman. 2013: Madison. VoIpp. & Haloern. 2011). ACA regulations distinguish between participatory and health-contingent wellness programs. Participatory wellness programs do not require employees to satisfy any particular standard, such as joining a gym or participating in a smoking-cessation program, in order to receive a reward. Health-contingent wellness programs require employees to perform specific activities related to a health factor or to achieve a specific health outcome in order to receive a reward (Lessack. 2013J.In theory, the primary ethical justification for employer-sponsored wellness programs is beneficence - the moral obligation to act for the benefit of others (Rothstein & Harrell, 2009). These programs appear to be a win-win situation: employees have opportunities to be healthier and save on healthcare costs, and employers can benefit from a more productive and healthier workforce (Voigt & Schmidt. 2013)In spite of these advantages, however, implementation of these programs has raised some ethical concerns. The model of beneficence that is integrated by employee-sponsored wellness programs tends to be paternalistic, with health plans designed for economic leverage to encourage employees to adopt the type of healthy lifestyle activities selected by the specific health plan (Rothstein & Harrell. 2009). Privacy for employees is another concern, as coaches and others carrying out the programs collect sensitive health information about employee participants. There are risks of this information being stolen, as well as concerns with employee autonomy (Berman. 2013). In addition, there are concerns about potential discrimination of unhealthy employees that may occur if the incentive programs result in discouraging unhealthy job applicants, encouraging unhealthy employees to resign, or discouraging them from taking advantage of health benefit packages offered by the institution (Madison. VoIpp. & Halpern. 2011). As increasing numbers and types of employer-sponsored healthy lifestyle programs increase, the question arises: At what point are incentives to participate or penalties for nonparticipation so great as to render participation in the program involuntary (Lessack. 2013)? Both the carrot (rewards) and stick (penalties) approaches to employee-sponsored healthy lifestyle program may raise some ethical concerns. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦理:雇主赞助的护士健康计划:胡萝卜加大棒的伦理。
研究表明,护士经常经历的工作压力和轮班工作是肥胖的危险因素。Zhao和Turner(2008)对轮班工人生活方式的研究进行了系统回顾。作者回顾的17项研究结果表明,与非轮班工人相比,轮班工人更有可能超重,有不良的生活方式行为,饮食不健康。在另一项研究中,来自六家医院的194名护士参加了人体测量和自我管理调查(Malik。布雷克。& Batt. 2011),研究结果表明,大多数护士超重,他们自我报告的健康、饮食和身体活动评级较低。随着研究人员不断发现肥胖和慢性疾病之间的关系,以及不健康的饮食习惯和缺乏锻炼对健康的负面影响,雇主们正在考虑新的方法来帮助确保健康的工作环境。2011年,卫生局局长建议将重点放在创建健康的工作场所上,以使员工更容易参加锻炼计划并选择有营养的食物(《企业健身工作》,2011年)。越来越多的雇主赞助的健康项目旨在通过鼓励健康的行为来控制不断上升的医疗成本(Lessack, 20131)。健康计划最常针对的行为是锻炼、吸烟和减肥(Muitaba &Cavico, 2013)。《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)允许公司为员工的健康行为提供财政激励(Berman. 2013: Madison)。VoIpp。& Haloern. 2011)。ACA法规区分了参与式健康计划和附带健康计划。参与式健康计划不要求员工达到任何特定的标准,比如加入健身房或参加戒烟计划,以获得奖励。与健康相关的健康计划要求员工执行与健康因素相关的特定活动或实现特定的健康结果,以获得奖励(Lessack. 2013)。从理论上讲,雇主赞助的健康计划的主要道德理由是慈善——为他人利益而行动的道德义务(Rothstein & Harrell, 2009)。这些计划似乎是一个双赢的局面:员工有机会变得更健康,节省医疗费用,雇主可以从一个更有生产力和更健康的劳动力中受益(Voigt & Schmidt. 2013)。然而,尽管有这些优势,这些计划的实施引起了一些道德问题。与员工赞助的健康计划相结合的慈善模式往往是家长式的,健康计划旨在利用经济杠杆,鼓励员工采用特定健康计划所选择的健康生活方式活动类型(Rothstein & Harrell, 2009)。员工的隐私是另一个问题,因为教练和其他执行项目的人会收集员工参与者的敏感健康信息。这些信息存在被窃取的风险,以及对员工自主权的担忧(Berman. 2013)。此外,如果激励计划导致不健康的求职者气馁,鼓励不健康的员工辞职,或阻止他们利用机构提供的健康福利待遇,可能会出现对不健康员工的潜在歧视(麦迪逊)。VoIpp。& Halpern. 2011)。随着雇主赞助的健康生活方式项目的数量和类型的增加,问题出现了:在什么情况下,参与的激励或不参与的惩罚会如此之大,以至于让人不由自主地参与该项目(Lessack, 2013)?对于员工发起的健康生活方式项目,胡萝卜(奖励)和大棒(处罚)的方法可能会引起一些道德问题。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trauma Informed Educational Practices: An Educational Innovation for Graduate Nursing Students Racial Identity and Transcultural Adoption. Racial Identity and Transcultural Adoption. Child Poverty, Toxic Stress, and Social Determinants of Health: Screening and Care Coordination. Overview & Summary: Emerging Global Health Concerns: How Nurses Respond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1