Informatics: The Standardized Nursing Terminologies: A National Survey of Nurses' Experience and Attitudes--SURVEY II: Participants' Perception of the Helpfulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies in Clinical Care.

L. Thede, P. Schwirian
{"title":"Informatics: The Standardized Nursing Terminologies: A National Survey of Nurses' Experience and Attitudes--SURVEY II: Participants' Perception of the Helpfulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies in Clinical Care.","authors":"L. Thede, P. Schwirian","doi":"10.3912/ojin.vol20no01infocol01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the fifth column reporting the results of a survey addressing nurses' attitudes and perceptions regarding standardized nursing terminologies, and completed by the authors in the fall of 2011. Prior columns have examined the demographics of our respondents and their familiarity with the American Nurse?.Association (ANA), standard ized nursing.terminologies (Schwirian & Ih.iad.fi> 2Q12); educational preparation for using the.terminologies, (Thede & Schwirian, 2013b): users perception .of confidence in using the..term in.ologi.es (Ihe.de & Schwirian ,.20.13.0 ; and offsets of documenting with sta nda rdized nursing, terminologies (Thede & Schwirian 20.13a*)In this column, we will report users' opinions about the helpfulness of a terminology in actual clinical practice. The findings presented below are from those respondents who answered 'yes' to the following three questions about the terminology: (a) are you familiar with the terminology?, (b) have you used it in some way?, and (c) have you used this particular terminology in actual patient care?Table 1 and Figure 1 illustrate the percentage of clinical users of a terminology who found the terminology helpful in actual clinical practice.; With the exception of the International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) terminology, for which there were only four responses, more than 60% of clinical users of the nursing-specific terminologies found them helpful in clinical patient care. The Clinical Care Classification (CCC) users and the Omaha System users gave the most positive responses as noted in Table 1. Users of the interdisciplinary terminologies, Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Code (LOINC) and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terminology (SNOMED CT), had the least positive perceptions regarding the helpfulness of the terminology in clinical practice. For the nursing-specific terminologies, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, International (NANDA-I) and the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) had relatively high percentages of users who did not find the terminology helpful in clinical practice.Tasks for Standardized TerminologiesClinical users of a terminology who answered 'yes' to the question about whether a terminology was helpful in clinical practice were then asked, \"In what ways was X (the specific terminology) helpful to you?\" A list of possible choices followed (below). Participants could check as many options as they felt were relevant and could also add other options.* Organizing patient care* Planning care* Generating appropriated outcomes* Generating appropriate interventions* Retrieving information on the same term for many patients* Other (please specify) or commentsTable 2 reports the numbers of respondents who selected each task and the percentage of clinical users of that terminology who found it helpful in that area. The bottom line provides the overall average of the helpfulness of the terminologies for each task/option. If one looks at this data for all the terminologies, planning care (64/1%) was found to benefit most from terminology use while retrieving information was found to benefit the least number of patients, followed closely by organizing patient care (53.7%). Because these terminologies have different foci, the percentages for each task may not be exactly comparable between the terminologies. For this reason, each terminology will be explored separately, along with some 'free text' tasks that respondents entered for that terminology.Nursing Specific TerminologiesMost of the ANA recognized, standardized terminologies are nursing specific; that is, they have more in common with nursing than any of the other health disciplines. This does not mean that they cannot be used in other disciplines; rather it means that they address many specific nursing situations, not only the dependent functions of nursing, but also independent nursing functions. …","PeriodicalId":35614,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Issues in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3912/ojin.vol20no01infocol01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This is the fifth column reporting the results of a survey addressing nurses' attitudes and perceptions regarding standardized nursing terminologies, and completed by the authors in the fall of 2011. Prior columns have examined the demographics of our respondents and their familiarity with the American Nurse?.Association (ANA), standard ized nursing.terminologies (Schwirian & Ih.iad.fi> 2Q12); educational preparation for using the.terminologies, (Thede & Schwirian, 2013b): users perception .of confidence in using the..term in.ologi.es (Ihe.de & Schwirian ,.20.13.0 ; and offsets of documenting with sta nda rdized nursing, terminologies (Thede & Schwirian 20.13a*)In this column, we will report users' opinions about the helpfulness of a terminology in actual clinical practice. The findings presented below are from those respondents who answered 'yes' to the following three questions about the terminology: (a) are you familiar with the terminology?, (b) have you used it in some way?, and (c) have you used this particular terminology in actual patient care?Table 1 and Figure 1 illustrate the percentage of clinical users of a terminology who found the terminology helpful in actual clinical practice.; With the exception of the International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) terminology, for which there were only four responses, more than 60% of clinical users of the nursing-specific terminologies found them helpful in clinical patient care. The Clinical Care Classification (CCC) users and the Omaha System users gave the most positive responses as noted in Table 1. Users of the interdisciplinary terminologies, Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Code (LOINC) and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terminology (SNOMED CT), had the least positive perceptions regarding the helpfulness of the terminology in clinical practice. For the nursing-specific terminologies, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, International (NANDA-I) and the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) had relatively high percentages of users who did not find the terminology helpful in clinical practice.Tasks for Standardized TerminologiesClinical users of a terminology who answered 'yes' to the question about whether a terminology was helpful in clinical practice were then asked, "In what ways was X (the specific terminology) helpful to you?" A list of possible choices followed (below). Participants could check as many options as they felt were relevant and could also add other options.* Organizing patient care* Planning care* Generating appropriated outcomes* Generating appropriate interventions* Retrieving information on the same term for many patients* Other (please specify) or commentsTable 2 reports the numbers of respondents who selected each task and the percentage of clinical users of that terminology who found it helpful in that area. The bottom line provides the overall average of the helpfulness of the terminologies for each task/option. If one looks at this data for all the terminologies, planning care (64/1%) was found to benefit most from terminology use while retrieving information was found to benefit the least number of patients, followed closely by organizing patient care (53.7%). Because these terminologies have different foci, the percentages for each task may not be exactly comparable between the terminologies. For this reason, each terminology will be explored separately, along with some 'free text' tasks that respondents entered for that terminology.Nursing Specific TerminologiesMost of the ANA recognized, standardized terminologies are nursing specific; that is, they have more in common with nursing than any of the other health disciplines. This does not mean that they cannot be used in other disciplines; rather it means that they address many specific nursing situations, not only the dependent functions of nursing, but also independent nursing functions. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息学:标准化护理术语:一项关于护士经验和态度的全国调查——调查二:参与者对标准化护理术语在临床护理中的有用性的看法。
这是报告护士对标准化护理术语的态度和看法的调查结果的第五栏,并由作者在2011年秋季完成。之前的专栏调查了受访者的人口统计数据以及他们对美国护士的熟悉程度。协会(ANA),规范化护理。术语(Schwirian & Ih.iad.)fi > 2 q12);使用的教育准备。术语,(Thede & Schwirian, 2013):用户在使用术语时的信心感知(ihed .de & Schwirian, 20.13.0;在本专栏中,我们将报告用户对术语在实际临床实践中的有用性的看法。以下是对以下三个有关专业术语的问题回答“是”的受访者的调查结果:(a)你是否熟悉专业术语?(b)你以某种方式使用过它吗?(c)你在实际的病人护理中使用过这个特殊的术语吗?表1和图1说明了在实际临床实践中发现该术语有用的临床术语使用者的百分比。除了国际护理实践分类(ICNP)术语外,只有四种回应,超过60%的护理专业术语的临床用户发现它们对临床患者护理有帮助。临床护理分类(CCC)用户和奥马哈系统用户给出了最积极的回应,见表1。跨学科术语,逻辑观察识别符名称和代码(LOINC)和系统化医学临床术语命名法(SNOMED CT)的使用者,对术语在临床实践中的帮助有最少的积极看法。对于护理专业术语,北美护理诊断协会、国际护理结果分类(NANDA-I)和护理结果分类(NOC)有相对较高的用户认为这些术语在临床实践中没有帮助。标准化术语的任务对术语是否有助于临床实践的问题回答“是”的术语的临床使用者,然后被问到:“X(特定术语)在哪些方面对你有帮助?”下面是一系列可能的选择。参与者可以选择他们认为相关的尽可能多的选项,也可以添加其他选项。*组织患者护理*计划护理*产生适当的结果*产生适当的干预措施*为许多患者检索同一术语的信息*其他(请指定)或评论stable 2报告选择每个任务的受访者数量以及该术语的临床用户在该领域发现有用的百分比。底线提供了每个任务/选项的术语的总体平均帮助。如果查看所有术语的数据,发现计划护理(64/1%)从术语使用中受益最多,而检索信息被发现受益最少的患者,其次是组织患者护理(53.7%)。由于这些术语具有不同的重点,因此每个任务的百分比可能无法在术语之间进行精确比较。出于这个原因,我们将分别探讨每个术语,以及受访者为该术语输入的一些“自由文本”任务。护理专用术语大多数ANA认可的标准化术语都是护理专用术语;也就是说,与其他任何健康学科相比,它们与护理有更多的共同点。这并不意味着它们不能用于其他学科;更确切地说,这意味着它们解决了许多特定的护理情况,不仅是护理的依赖功能,而且是独立的护理功能。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trauma Informed Educational Practices: An Educational Innovation for Graduate Nursing Students Racial Identity and Transcultural Adoption. Racial Identity and Transcultural Adoption. Child Poverty, Toxic Stress, and Social Determinants of Health: Screening and Care Coordination. Overview & Summary: Emerging Global Health Concerns: How Nurses Respond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1