Siddharth Nobell, A. Majumdar, Shovon Mukherjee, Sukumar Chakraborty, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Soumitra Bose, Anindita Dutta, Sandhya Sethuraman, D. Westervelt, Shairik Sengupta, Rakhi Basu, V. McNeill
{"title":"Validation of In-field Calibration for Low-Cost Sensors Measuring Ambient Particulate Matter in Kolkata, India","authors":"Siddharth Nobell, A. Majumdar, Shovon Mukherjee, Sukumar Chakraborty, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Soumitra Bose, Anindita Dutta, Sandhya Sethuraman, D. Westervelt, Shairik Sengupta, Rakhi Basu, V. McNeill","doi":"10.4209/aaqr.230010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-cost sensors (LCS) provide opportunities for neighborhood-level air pollution data collection, yet significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the accurate application and interpretation of LCS. In this study, we present an in-field calibration of a network of 20 low-cost ambient particulate matter sensors (LCS) in greater Kolkata, India, operating between October 2018–April 2019. In order to understand LCS performance in relation to local reference-grade PM 2.5 monitors (RGMs), three of these LCS were co-located with RGMs operated by the West Bengal Pollution Control Board at Rabindra Bharati University (RBU), Victoria Memorial (VICTORIA), and Padmapukur (Howrah, PDM). Data from the co-locations were used to calibrate the LCS network using random forest regression and multiple linear regression approaches. Measured relative humidity and temperature were significant model features. Agreement between the LCS and RGM for 24-h averaged PM 2.5 measurements was strongest at RBU, with an uncalibrated root mean squared error (RMSE) of 27.1 µ g m –3 , followed by PDM (32.6 µ g m –3 ) and VICTORIA (50.7 µ g m –3 ). Multiple linear regression was used to derive calibration models. Cross-calibration between co-located LCS-RGM pairs was tested. The LCS data after cross-calibration correctly identified days as being in or out of attainment with the 24h National Ambient Air Quality Standard of 60 µ g m –3 91% of the time. The corrected data accurately identifies days with an India scale Air Quality Index of “poor” or worse 94% of the time. This suggests that LCS can be a useful supplement to RGM networks for air quality management. Diurnal trends and a high level of correlation across the hybrid LCS-RGM network suggest regional and secondary sources of PM 2.5 are important in Kolkata.","PeriodicalId":7402,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Low-cost sensors (LCS) provide opportunities for neighborhood-level air pollution data collection, yet significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the accurate application and interpretation of LCS. In this study, we present an in-field calibration of a network of 20 low-cost ambient particulate matter sensors (LCS) in greater Kolkata, India, operating between October 2018–April 2019. In order to understand LCS performance in relation to local reference-grade PM 2.5 monitors (RGMs), three of these LCS were co-located with RGMs operated by the West Bengal Pollution Control Board at Rabindra Bharati University (RBU), Victoria Memorial (VICTORIA), and Padmapukur (Howrah, PDM). Data from the co-locations were used to calibrate the LCS network using random forest regression and multiple linear regression approaches. Measured relative humidity and temperature were significant model features. Agreement between the LCS and RGM for 24-h averaged PM 2.5 measurements was strongest at RBU, with an uncalibrated root mean squared error (RMSE) of 27.1 µ g m –3 , followed by PDM (32.6 µ g m –3 ) and VICTORIA (50.7 µ g m –3 ). Multiple linear regression was used to derive calibration models. Cross-calibration between co-located LCS-RGM pairs was tested. The LCS data after cross-calibration correctly identified days as being in or out of attainment with the 24h National Ambient Air Quality Standard of 60 µ g m –3 91% of the time. The corrected data accurately identifies days with an India scale Air Quality Index of “poor” or worse 94% of the time. This suggests that LCS can be a useful supplement to RGM networks for air quality management. Diurnal trends and a high level of correlation across the hybrid LCS-RGM network suggest regional and secondary sources of PM 2.5 are important in Kolkata.
低成本传感器(LCS)为社区空气污染数据收集提供了机会,但在LCS的准确应用和解释方面仍存在重大知识空白。在本研究中,我们对2018年10月至2019年4月期间在印度大加尔各答运行的20个低成本环境颗粒物传感器(LCS)网络进行了现场校准。为了了解LCS与当地参考级pm2.5监测仪(RGMs)的关系,其中三个LCS与西孟加拉邦污染控制委员会在Rabindra Bharati大学(RBU)、维多利亚纪念堂(Victoria Memorial)和Padmapukur (Howrah, PDM)运营的RGMs一起安置。使用随机森林回归和多元线性回归方法,利用共址数据校准LCS网络。测量的相对湿度和温度是重要的模型特征。LCS和RGM在RBU的24小时平均pm2.5测量值之间的一致性最强,未经校准的均方根误差(RMSE)为27.1µg m -3,其次是PDM(32.6µg m -3)和VICTORIA(50.7µg m -3)。采用多元线性回归方法建立标定模型。对同址LCS-RGM对进行交叉校准检验。交叉校准后的LCS数据正确地识别出符合或不符合24小时国家环境空气质量标准60µg -3的天数占91%。修正后的数据准确地确定了94%的印度空气质量指数为“差”或更差的日子。这表明LCS可以作为RGM网络的有益补充,用于空气质量管理。混合LCS-RGM网络的日趋势和高度相关性表明,PM 2.5的区域和次要来源在加尔各答很重要。
期刊介绍:
The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues. It encompasses a multi-disciplinary field, including:
- Aerosol, air quality, atmospheric chemistry and global change;
- Air toxics (hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)) - Sources, control, transport and fate, human exposure;
- Nanoparticle and nanotechnology;
- Sources, combustion, thermal decomposition, emission, properties, behavior, formation, transport, deposition, measurement and analysis;
- Effects on the environments;
- Air quality and human health;
- Bioaerosols;
- Indoor air quality;
- Energy and air pollution;
- Pollution control technologies;
- Invention and improvement of sampling instruments and technologies;
- Optical/radiative properties and remote sensing;
- Carbon dioxide emission, capture, storage and utilization; novel methods for the reduction of carbon dioxide emission;
- Other topics related to aerosol and air quality.