Effect of an Aerosol Dryer on Ambient PM Measurements with SDS011 Low Cost Sensors during a Two-year Period in Duisburg, Germany

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Aerosol and Air Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4209/aaqr.230080
Martin Nothhelfer, O. Sperber, A. Todea, Britta Schunke, Olga Romazanowa, Stefan Schumacher, D. Bathen, C. Asbach
{"title":"Effect of an Aerosol Dryer on Ambient PM Measurements with SDS011 Low Cost Sensors during a Two-year Period in Duisburg, Germany","authors":"Martin Nothhelfer, O. Sperber, A. Todea, Britta Schunke, Olga Romazanowa, Stefan Schumacher, D. Bathen, C. Asbach","doi":"10.4209/aaqr.230080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors (NovaFitness SDS011) in connection with a self-developed aerosol dryer has been investigated in ambient air measurements over a two-year period by comparing the reported mass concentration of particulate matter (PM x ) with the results of a PM 10 reference filter sampler and two Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalances (TEOM), one for PM 10 and one for PM 2.5 . Special emphasis was put on the effect of relative air humidity on sensor readings. In total, four sensors were used per year in two pairs. For one pair, the aerosol was dried with a newly developed low-cost aerosol dryer, whereas the other pair measured the untreated aerosol. The results show that the 24 h average concentration reported by the sensor could be by a factor of up to 38 too high compared to the gravimetric measurement, if the aerosol was not dried, whereas the mismatch with a maximum factor of 5.4 was significantly lower when using the dryer. For the PM 10 concentration correction factors were determined from the ratios of the measured 24 h values of the sensors and the gravimetric reference. Corrected 24 h mean PM 10 concentrations with dryer agreed mostly within a factor of 2 with the gravimetric reference data from the filter sampler, whereas results from measurements without dryer agreed only within a factor of 5. The results further show that the sensors underestimate the mass concentrations in case of low relative humidity ( < 45%). Similar results are seen for the PM 2.5 data as well. Therefore, the use of a constant correction factor was checked. It is shown that an average correction factor of around 2.5 for the PM 10 and around 2.6 for the PM 2.5 readings could be a reasonable approach for all SDS011 sensors equipped with the newly developed aerosol dryer.","PeriodicalId":7402,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors (NovaFitness SDS011) in connection with a self-developed aerosol dryer has been investigated in ambient air measurements over a two-year period by comparing the reported mass concentration of particulate matter (PM x ) with the results of a PM 10 reference filter sampler and two Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalances (TEOM), one for PM 10 and one for PM 2.5 . Special emphasis was put on the effect of relative air humidity on sensor readings. In total, four sensors were used per year in two pairs. For one pair, the aerosol was dried with a newly developed low-cost aerosol dryer, whereas the other pair measured the untreated aerosol. The results show that the 24 h average concentration reported by the sensor could be by a factor of up to 38 too high compared to the gravimetric measurement, if the aerosol was not dried, whereas the mismatch with a maximum factor of 5.4 was significantly lower when using the dryer. For the PM 10 concentration correction factors were determined from the ratios of the measured 24 h values of the sensors and the gravimetric reference. Corrected 24 h mean PM 10 concentrations with dryer agreed mostly within a factor of 2 with the gravimetric reference data from the filter sampler, whereas results from measurements without dryer agreed only within a factor of 5. The results further show that the sensors underestimate the mass concentrations in case of low relative humidity ( < 45%). Similar results are seen for the PM 2.5 data as well. Therefore, the use of a constant correction factor was checked. It is shown that an average correction factor of around 2.5 for the PM 10 and around 2.6 for the PM 2.5 readings could be a reasonable approach for all SDS011 sensors equipped with the newly developed aerosol dryer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在德国杜伊斯堡两年期间,气溶胶干燥器对SDS011低成本传感器环境PM测量的影响
低成本颗粒物(PM)传感器(NovaFitness SDS011)与自主开发的气溶胶干燥器在两年的环境空气测量中进行了性能研究,通过将报告的颗粒物(PM x)的质量浓度与PM 10参考过滤器采样器和两个锥形元件振荡微天平(TEOM)的结果进行比较,一个用于PM 10,一个用于PM 2.5。特别强调了相对空气湿度对传感器读数的影响。每年总共使用4个传感器,分为两对。其中一组使用新开发的低成本气溶胶干燥机进行干燥,而另一组使用未经处理的气溶胶进行干燥。结果表明,如果气溶胶不干燥,传感器报告的24小时平均浓度与重力测量值相比可能高出38倍,而使用干燥器时与最大因子5.4的不匹配显著降低。pm10浓度校正因子由传感器测得的24 h值与重力参考值之比确定。经校正的24小时PM 10平均浓度与过滤器取样器的重量参考数据的一致性在2倍以内,而未使用干燥器的测量结果仅在5倍以内。结果进一步表明,在低相对湿度(< 45%)的情况下,传感器低估了质量浓度。pm2.5数据也出现了类似的结果。因此,使用常数校正因子进行了检查。结果表明,PM 10的平均校正系数约为2.5,PM 2.5读数的平均校正系数约为2.6,对于配备新开发的气溶胶干燥器的所有SDS011传感器来说,这可能是一种合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Aerosol and Air Quality Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues. It encompasses a multi-disciplinary field, including: - Aerosol, air quality, atmospheric chemistry and global change; - Air toxics (hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)) - Sources, control, transport and fate, human exposure; - Nanoparticle and nanotechnology; - Sources, combustion, thermal decomposition, emission, properties, behavior, formation, transport, deposition, measurement and analysis; - Effects on the environments; - Air quality and human health; - Bioaerosols; - Indoor air quality; - Energy and air pollution; - Pollution control technologies; - Invention and improvement of sampling instruments and technologies; - Optical/radiative properties and remote sensing; - Carbon dioxide emission, capture, storage and utilization; novel methods for the reduction of carbon dioxide emission; - Other topics related to aerosol and air quality.
期刊最新文献
Ambient PM2.5 temporal variation and source apportionment in Mbarara, Uganda. Real-World Effectiveness of Portable Air Cleaners in Reducing Home Particulate Matter Concentrations. Effect of Future Climate Change on Stratosphere-to-Troposphere-Exchange Driven Ozone in the Northern Hemisphere. Effects of E-Cigarette Liquid Ratios on the Gravimetric Filter Correction Factors and Real-Time Measurements. Composition Analysis of Airborne Microbiota in Outdoor and Indoor Based on Dust Separated by Micro-sized and Nano-sized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1