The development of randomization and deceptive behavior in mixed strategy games

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Quantitative Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3982/qe1769
I. Brocas, J. Carrillo
{"title":"The development of randomization and deceptive behavior in mixed strategy games","authors":"I. Brocas, J. Carrillo","doi":"10.3982/qe1769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the foundations for the development of optimal randomization in mixed strategy games. We consider a population of children and adolescents (7 to 16 years old) and study in the laboratory their behavior in a nonzero sum, hide‐and‐seek game with a unique interior mixed strategy equilibrium where each location has a known but different value. The vast majority of participants favor the high‐value location not only as seekers (as predicted by theory) but also as hiders (in contradiction with theory). The behavior is extremely similar across all ages, and also similar to that of the college students control adult group. We also study the use of cheap talk (potentially deceptive) messages in this game. Hiders are excessively truthful in the messages they send while seekers have a slight tendency to (correctly) believe hiders. In general, however, messages have a small impact on outcomes. The results point to a powerful (erroneous) heuristic thinking in two‐person randomization settings that does not get corrected, even partially, with age.","PeriodicalId":46811,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study the foundations for the development of optimal randomization in mixed strategy games. We consider a population of children and adolescents (7 to 16 years old) and study in the laboratory their behavior in a nonzero sum, hide‐and‐seek game with a unique interior mixed strategy equilibrium where each location has a known but different value. The vast majority of participants favor the high‐value location not only as seekers (as predicted by theory) but also as hiders (in contradiction with theory). The behavior is extremely similar across all ages, and also similar to that of the college students control adult group. We also study the use of cheap talk (potentially deceptive) messages in this game. Hiders are excessively truthful in the messages they send while seekers have a slight tendency to (correctly) believe hiders. In general, however, messages have a small impact on outcomes. The results point to a powerful (erroneous) heuristic thinking in two‐person randomization settings that does not get corrected, even partially, with age.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合策略博弈中随机化和欺骗行为的发展
研究混合策略对策中最优随机化的发展基础。我们考虑了一群儿童和青少年(7至16岁),并在实验室中研究了他们在非零和、具有独特内部混合策略均衡的捉迷藏游戏中的行为,其中每个位置都有已知但不同的值。绝大多数参与者不仅喜欢寻找高价值的位置(正如理论所预测的那样),而且喜欢隐藏高价值的位置(与理论相矛盾)。这种行为在所有年龄段都非常相似,也与大学生控制的成人组相似。我们还研究了在这个游戏中使用的廉价谈话(潜在的欺骗性)信息。隐藏者在他们发送的信息中过于真实,而搜索者则稍微倾向于(正确地)相信隐藏者。然而,总的来说,信息对结果的影响很小。结果表明,在两人随机化设置中,一种强大的(错误的)启发式思维不会随着年龄的增长而得到纠正,甚至部分纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geometric methods for finite rational inattention Measuring trust in institutions and its causal effect A robust permutation test for subvector inference in linear regressions Difficulties in testing for capital overaccumulation Bootstrapping Laplace transforms of volatility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1