{"title":"Disinformation in Spain one year after COVID-19. Analysis of the Newtral and Maldita verifications","authors":"A. Almansa-Martínez","doi":"10.4185/RLCS-2022-1538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to a Digital New Deal study (Kornbluh and Goodman, 2020), participation and engagement with these pages increased by 102% since the 2016 US presidential election. In their digital strategy, social networks are fundamental vehicles of diffusion but also the link-building work with similar pages that contributes to creating and reinforcing social bubbles that promote polarization (Nikolov et. al., 2015;DiFranco;Gloria-García, 2017). [...]the disinformation of extreme right-wing ideologies causes more adherence and, therefore, more viralization than those of the extreme left, registering an average of 426 interactions per thousand followers per week (Edelson et al., 2021). Achieving high viral content or manipulating social interactions is also an objective of manipulation and a fast track to position issues in public debate. [...]although it is in 2010 when the first fake news about electoral processes in Massachusetts began to be recorded, it is not until 2014 when the first intentional information begins to be observed that","PeriodicalId":46616,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
According to a Digital New Deal study (Kornbluh and Goodman, 2020), participation and engagement with these pages increased by 102% since the 2016 US presidential election. In their digital strategy, social networks are fundamental vehicles of diffusion but also the link-building work with similar pages that contributes to creating and reinforcing social bubbles that promote polarization (Nikolov et. al., 2015;DiFranco;Gloria-García, 2017). [...]the disinformation of extreme right-wing ideologies causes more adherence and, therefore, more viralization than those of the extreme left, registering an average of 426 interactions per thousand followers per week (Edelson et al., 2021). Achieving high viral content or manipulating social interactions is also an objective of manipulation and a fast track to position issues in public debate. [...]although it is in 2010 when the first fake news about electoral processes in Massachusetts began to be recorded, it is not until 2014 when the first intentional information begins to be observed that
根据一项数字新政研究(Kornbluh and Goodman, 2020),自2016年美国总统大选以来,这些页面的参与度和参与度增加了102%。在他们的数字战略中,社交网络是传播的基本工具,也是与类似页面的链接建设工作,有助于创造和加强促进两极分化的社会泡沫(Nikolov等人,2015;DiFranco;Gloria-García, 2017)。[…极右翼意识形态的虚假信息比极左意识形态的虚假信息更有吸引力,因此,病毒化程度更高,每周每千名追随者平均有426次互动(Edelson等人,2021)。获得高病毒式传播内容或操纵社交互动也是操纵的目标,也是在公众辩论中定位问题的快速通道。[…尽管关于马萨诸塞州选举过程的第一个假新闻是在2010年开始被记录下来的,但直到2014年,人们才开始观察到第一个故意的信息