EU-UN partnership in military conflict management: Whither the African Union security infrastructure?

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE African Journal on Conflict Resolution Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.4314/AJCR.V11I1.68158
A. Hengari
{"title":"EU-UN partnership in military conflict management: Whither the African Union security infrastructure?","authors":"A. Hengari","doi":"10.4314/AJCR.V11I1.68158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article problematises the nascent relationship between the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU) in African conflict management. Constructing the EU as a security actor, including its validation through the UN, is not a process solely based on the normative claims inherent in the EU as a sui generis actor, but more importantly such claims are grounded in the EU as offering greater capacity and efficiency in African conflict management. In light of this argument, many studies have analysed this relationship in terms of inputs and outputs in field missions undertaken under this framework. While the EU-UN relationship can be viewed a priori as a process driven by ‘African needs and requirements’ as an end security consumer, the development of the EU-UN relationship poses inherent risks  to the African Union (AU) slogan of ‘African problems, African solutions’ or ‘African solutions to African problems’. In light of the above-mentioned, the EU-UN question is surprisingly un-problematised and has received little critical attention in this context. By putting the EU-UN relationship into focus, this article shifts attention to the increasing complexities and potential uncertainties that this type of institutionalisation and coordination can generate on the development of Africa’s infrastructure and narratives of conflict management.","PeriodicalId":43186,"journal":{"name":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/AJCR.V11I1.68158","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJCR.V11I1.68158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article problematises the nascent relationship between the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU) in African conflict management. Constructing the EU as a security actor, including its validation through the UN, is not a process solely based on the normative claims inherent in the EU as a sui generis actor, but more importantly such claims are grounded in the EU as offering greater capacity and efficiency in African conflict management. In light of this argument, many studies have analysed this relationship in terms of inputs and outputs in field missions undertaken under this framework. While the EU-UN relationship can be viewed a priori as a process driven by ‘African needs and requirements’ as an end security consumer, the development of the EU-UN relationship poses inherent risks  to the African Union (AU) slogan of ‘African problems, African solutions’ or ‘African solutions to African problems’. In light of the above-mentioned, the EU-UN question is surprisingly un-problematised and has received little critical attention in this context. By putting the EU-UN relationship into focus, this article shifts attention to the increasing complexities and potential uncertainties that this type of institutionalisation and coordination can generate on the development of Africa’s infrastructure and narratives of conflict management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟-联合国在军事冲突管理方面的伙伴关系:非洲联盟安全基础设施向何处去?
本文对联合国(UN)与欧盟(EU)在非洲冲突管理方面的新生关系提出质疑。将欧盟构建为一个安全行为体,包括通过联合国对其进行验证,并不是一个仅仅基于欧盟作为一个独特行为体固有的规范要求的过程,但更重要的是,这些要求是基于欧盟在非洲冲突管理方面提供更大的能力和效率。鉴于这一论点,许多研究从在这一框架下进行的外地特派团的投入和产出方面分析了这种关系。虽然欧盟-联合国关系可以被先验地视为由“非洲需求和要求”作为最终安全消费者驱动的过程,但欧盟-联合国关系的发展对非洲联盟(AU)“非洲问题,非洲解决方案”或“非洲解决非洲问题”的口号构成了内在风险。鉴于上述情况,欧盟-联合国问题令人惊讶地没有问题,在这方面几乎没有受到批评。通过聚焦欧盟-联合国关系,本文将注意力转移到这种制度化和协调可能对非洲基础设施发展和冲突管理叙事产生的日益复杂和潜在的不确定性上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Political Ecology of Farmer-Herder Conflict in Ghana: A Case Study of the Kwahu Afram Plains South District Guerrillas and Combative Mothers: Women and the Armed Struggle in South Africa Transferring Policy: The African Union's Protection of Civilians Policy in Peacekeeping Missions in Somalia and South Sudan Emerging Local Voices and New Possibilities toward Attaining Sustainable Peace in Bawku, north-eastern Ghana Civil War between the Ethiopian Government and the Tigray People's Liberation Front: A Challenge to Implement the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1