African ruling political parties and the making of 'authoritarian' democracies : extending the frontiers of social justice in Nigeria

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE African Journal on Conflict Resolution Pub Date : 2009-01-20 DOI:10.4314/AJCR.V8I2.39426
S. B. Kura
{"title":"African ruling political parties and the making of 'authoritarian' democracies : extending the frontiers of social justice in Nigeria","authors":"S. B. Kura","doi":"10.4314/AJCR.V8I2.39426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African democracies are distinguished by the character of their political parties. They are easily labelled as illiberal civilian autocracies. These features coupled with emerging so-called dominant ruling parties, demonstrate the inclination towards a new form of ‘modern' democratic authoritarianism. In other words, the ruling dominant parties are\nappearing to be a ‘reincarnation' of the one-party system and military rule that held sway for about three to four decades in Africa (from the 1960s). In the process of this transformation, African ruling parties have been grossly destabilising opposition and perceived dissenters through clientelism, patronage politics and extra-legal means, thereby undermining the provision of social justice in the guise of democratisation. In the light of this there seems to be a theoretical and empirical lacuna in the discourse of social justice, in explaining the contradictions inherent in safeguarding democracy through undemocratic practices, such as election misconduct, manipulation of judiciary, lack of provision of human\nrights, assassination and victimisation of political opponents, through which the provision of social justice is undermined. In this context and given the democratic authoritarian tendencies of African ruling political parties, this paper seeks to explore the pattern of authoritarian practice in Nigeria's ruling party – the People's Democratic Party (PDP) vis-a-vis\nthe problems of social justice provision. Nigeria has returned to democracy about a decade ago, but the country is sliding towards a one-party system. The abuse of social justice, through detention, assassination and police brutality, defies any logic of democratisation. The paper therefore seeks to introduce a working framework for extending the frontiers\nof social justice for an integrative analysis and understanding of social justice in developing African democracies. African Journal on Conflict Resolution Vol. 8 (2) 2008: pp. 63-102","PeriodicalId":43186,"journal":{"name":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/AJCR.V8I2.39426","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal on Conflict Resolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJCR.V8I2.39426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

African democracies are distinguished by the character of their political parties. They are easily labelled as illiberal civilian autocracies. These features coupled with emerging so-called dominant ruling parties, demonstrate the inclination towards a new form of ‘modern' democratic authoritarianism. In other words, the ruling dominant parties are appearing to be a ‘reincarnation' of the one-party system and military rule that held sway for about three to four decades in Africa (from the 1960s). In the process of this transformation, African ruling parties have been grossly destabilising opposition and perceived dissenters through clientelism, patronage politics and extra-legal means, thereby undermining the provision of social justice in the guise of democratisation. In the light of this there seems to be a theoretical and empirical lacuna in the discourse of social justice, in explaining the contradictions inherent in safeguarding democracy through undemocratic practices, such as election misconduct, manipulation of judiciary, lack of provision of human rights, assassination and victimisation of political opponents, through which the provision of social justice is undermined. In this context and given the democratic authoritarian tendencies of African ruling political parties, this paper seeks to explore the pattern of authoritarian practice in Nigeria's ruling party – the People's Democratic Party (PDP) vis-a-vis the problems of social justice provision. Nigeria has returned to democracy about a decade ago, but the country is sliding towards a one-party system. The abuse of social justice, through detention, assassination and police brutality, defies any logic of democratisation. The paper therefore seeks to introduce a working framework for extending the frontiers of social justice for an integrative analysis and understanding of social justice in developing African democracies. African Journal on Conflict Resolution Vol. 8 (2) 2008: pp. 63-102
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲执政政党与“威权”民主的形成:尼日利亚社会正义的疆界扩展
非洲民主国家的特点在于其政党的性质。他们很容易被贴上不自由的平民独裁的标签。这些特征与新兴的所谓主导执政党相结合,表明了一种新形式的“现代”民主威权主义的倾向。换句话说,执政的主要政党似乎是一党制和军事统治的“转世”,一党制和军事统治在非洲统治了大约三到四十年(从20世纪60年代开始)。在这一转变的过程中,非洲的执政党通过裙带关系、庇护政治和法外手段,严重破坏了反对派和持不同政见者的稳定,从而破坏了以民主化为幌子的社会正义。鉴于此,在解释通过不民主的做法(如选举不当、操纵司法、缺乏人权保障、暗杀和迫害政治对手)维护民主所固有的矛盾方面,社会正义的论述似乎存在理论和经验上的空白,通过这些做法,社会正义的提供受到了破坏。在此背景下,鉴于非洲执政政党的民主专制倾向,本文试图探讨尼日利亚执政党-人民民主党(PDP)的专制实践模式与社会正义提供问题的关系。尼日利亚大约在十年前恢复了民主,但该国正在滑向一党制。通过拘留、暗杀和警察暴行来滥用社会正义,违背了任何民主化的逻辑。因此,本文试图引入一个工作框架,以扩大社会正义的边界,以便对发展中非洲民主国家的社会正义进行综合分析和理解。《非洲问题研究》,2008年第8卷第2期,第63-102页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Political Ecology of Farmer-Herder Conflict in Ghana: A Case Study of the Kwahu Afram Plains South District Guerrillas and Combative Mothers: Women and the Armed Struggle in South Africa Transferring Policy: The African Union's Protection of Civilians Policy in Peacekeeping Missions in Somalia and South Sudan Emerging Local Voices and New Possibilities toward Attaining Sustainable Peace in Bawku, north-eastern Ghana Civil War between the Ethiopian Government and the Tigray People's Liberation Front: A Challenge to Implement the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1