The importance of core beliefs in the process of posttraumatic adaptation – the Polish adaptation of the Core Beliefs Inventory

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ppn.2018.77211
Z. Juczyński, N. Ogińska-Bulik
{"title":"The importance of core beliefs in the process of posttraumatic adaptation – the Polish adaptation of the Core Beliefs Inventory","authors":"Z. Juczyński, N. Ogińska-Bulik","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2018.77211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The process of adaptation to trauma requires readiness to assess the distortion of basic beliefs related to an experienced life event. The adapted Core Beliefs Inventory, developed by Cann et al., measures readiness to revise distorted as a result of the trauma the basic beliefs. Method: The basis for the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Inventory is the results of surveys of several groups of people (N = 415), who experienced a traumatic event (domestic violence, illness, transport accident). Except the Core Beliefs Inventory (CBI) the following tests have been applied: the Impact of Event Scale – Revised, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory, Cognitive Processing of Trauma Scale and Event Related Rumination Inventory. Results: Study of structural relevancy confirmed the heterogeneity of the construct of basic beliefs. The best features are a 3-factor model that explains 74.9% variance. Reliability: Cronbach α is 0.90 for the whole scale and 0.57 to 0.70 for the 3 factors; test-retest stability is from 0.52 to 0.77. External validity was confirmed by correlating CBI with the results of other tools, including PTCI, CPOTS and ERRI. Sten standards were established for the general belief indicator. A stronger association of disruptions of core beliefs with PTSD (r = 0.55) than PTG (r = 0.40) was confirmed. Conclusions: Polish version of CBI seems to be a useful tool for assessing disruptions of core beliefs and can be applied both in research and in practice.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2018.77211","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2018.77211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The process of adaptation to trauma requires readiness to assess the distortion of basic beliefs related to an experienced life event. The adapted Core Beliefs Inventory, developed by Cann et al., measures readiness to revise distorted as a result of the trauma the basic beliefs. Method: The basis for the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Inventory is the results of surveys of several groups of people (N = 415), who experienced a traumatic event (domestic violence, illness, transport accident). Except the Core Beliefs Inventory (CBI) the following tests have been applied: the Impact of Event Scale – Revised, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory, Cognitive Processing of Trauma Scale and Event Related Rumination Inventory. Results: Study of structural relevancy confirmed the heterogeneity of the construct of basic beliefs. The best features are a 3-factor model that explains 74.9% variance. Reliability: Cronbach α is 0.90 for the whole scale and 0.57 to 0.70 for the 3 factors; test-retest stability is from 0.52 to 0.77. External validity was confirmed by correlating CBI with the results of other tools, including PTCI, CPOTS and ERRI. Sten standards were established for the general belief indicator. A stronger association of disruptions of core beliefs with PTSD (r = 0.55) than PTG (r = 0.40) was confirmed. Conclusions: Polish version of CBI seems to be a useful tool for assessing disruptions of core beliefs and can be applied both in research and in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心信念在创伤后适应过程中的重要性——核心信念量表的波兰化调整
目的:对创伤的适应过程需要准备好评估与经历过的生活事件有关的基本信念的扭曲。由Cann等人开发的核心信念量表(Core Beliefs Inventory)衡量了因创伤而扭曲的基本信念的修正意愿。方法:对几组经历过创伤性事件(家庭暴力、疾病、交通事故)的人(N = 415)的调查结果作为评估量表心理测量特性的依据。除核心信念量表(CBI)外,还采用了事件影响量表(修订版)、创伤后应激障碍量表、创伤后成长量表、创伤后认知量表、创伤认知加工量表和事件相关反思量表。结果:结构相关性研究证实了基本信念结构的异质性。最好的特征是一个3因素模型,解释了74.9%的方差。信度:整个量表的Cronbach α为0.90,三个因子的Cronbach α为0.57 ~ 0.70;重测稳定性为0.52 ~ 0.77。通过将CBI与其他工具(包括PTCI、CPOTS和ERRI)的结果相关联来证实外部效度。建立了一般信度指标的标准。核心信念的破坏与PTSD (r = 0.55)的关联强于PTG (r = 0.40)。结论:波兰版本的CBI似乎是评估核心信念破坏的有用工具,可以应用于研究和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual basis of addiction memory, allostasis and dual processes, and the classical therapy of addiction. Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions Pulmonary embolism masked by symptoms of mental disorders The COVID-19 pandemic: new challenges for the mental health protection system The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale as an instrument for assessing quality – a psychometric evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1