Pharmacotherapy of challenging behaviours in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ppn.2019.86257
D. Puzio, A. Gmitrowicz, I. Makowska
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy of challenging behaviours in children \nand adolescents with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"D. Puzio, A. Gmitrowicz, I. Makowska","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2019.86257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The article attempts to answer the question whether a drug-therapy of challenging behaviours in paediatric patients with autism is warranted. If so, how should it be implemented, including mainly the choice of agent, dosage, length of therapy and drug’s expected efficacy and safety. Views: Challenging behaviours (CB) are common problems in discussed population that additionally aggravate the level of individual functioning. When a drug-therapy of CB is concerned, there is an alarming tendency of increasing antipsychotic use and polypharmacy which exceeds the body of evidence. Out of many agents studied, only risperidone and aripiprazole exhibit established evidence for effectiveness and safety during a short-term use. Research shows comparable efficacy of these drugs and several particularities in secondary outcomes profile. It is established that in pedopsychiatric patients with autism and challenging behaviours both agents equally increase body weight in a statistically significant way; however, risperidone is associated with bigger risk of metabolic changes and extrapyramidal symptoms than aripiprazole. In addition, risperidone significantly augments the risk of hyperprolactinaemia while aripiprazole exhibits no such an action. Aripiprazole, on the other hand, is linked with higher frequency of sedation. Conclusions: Drug-therapy of CB in autism should be considered only as an addition to comprehensive interventions when behavioural and psychosocial measures lack effectiveness. The safety/efficacy profile in long-term use remains undetermined and needs further studies.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2019.86257","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2019.86257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The article attempts to answer the question whether a drug-therapy of challenging behaviours in paediatric patients with autism is warranted. If so, how should it be implemented, including mainly the choice of agent, dosage, length of therapy and drug’s expected efficacy and safety. Views: Challenging behaviours (CB) are common problems in discussed population that additionally aggravate the level of individual functioning. When a drug-therapy of CB is concerned, there is an alarming tendency of increasing antipsychotic use and polypharmacy which exceeds the body of evidence. Out of many agents studied, only risperidone and aripiprazole exhibit established evidence for effectiveness and safety during a short-term use. Research shows comparable efficacy of these drugs and several particularities in secondary outcomes profile. It is established that in pedopsychiatric patients with autism and challenging behaviours both agents equally increase body weight in a statistically significant way; however, risperidone is associated with bigger risk of metabolic changes and extrapyramidal symptoms than aripiprazole. In addition, risperidone significantly augments the risk of hyperprolactinaemia while aripiprazole exhibits no such an action. Aripiprazole, on the other hand, is linked with higher frequency of sedation. Conclusions: Drug-therapy of CB in autism should be considered only as an addition to comprehensive interventions when behavioural and psychosocial measures lack effectiveness. The safety/efficacy profile in long-term use remains undetermined and needs further studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年挑战性行为的药物治疗
目的:本文试图回答是否有必要对儿童自闭症患者的挑战性行为进行药物治疗的问题。如果有,应该如何实施,主要包括药物的选择、剂量、治疗时间以及药物的预期疗效和安全性。挑战性行为(CB)是讨论人群中常见的问题,它会加剧个体功能水平。当涉及到CB的药物治疗时,有一种令人担忧的趋势,即抗精神病药物的使用和多种药物的使用已经超出了证据的范围。在研究的许多药物中,只有利培酮和阿立哌唑在短期使用中表现出有效性和安全性。研究表明,这些药物的疗效相当,在次要结局方面有几个特点。在患有自闭症和挑战性行为的儿童精神病患者中,两种药物均以统计学显著的方式增加体重;然而,与阿立哌唑相比,利培酮与更大的代谢变化和锥体外系症状相关。此外,利培酮显著增加高泌乳素血症的风险,而阿立哌唑则没有这种作用。另一方面,阿立哌唑与更高频率的镇静有关。结论:当行为和社会心理措施缺乏效果时,自闭症患者的CB药物治疗应被视为综合干预措施的补充。长期使用的安全性/有效性仍不确定,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual basis of addiction memory, allostasis and dual processes, and the classical therapy of addiction. Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions Pulmonary embolism masked by symptoms of mental disorders The COVID-19 pandemic: new challenges for the mental health protection system The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale as an instrument for assessing quality – a psychometric evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1