Subjective evaluation of admission and first days of hospitalization at a psychiatric ward from the perspective of patients

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ppn.2020.94694
P. Błądziński, Marta Hat, A. Daren, Dawid Kruk, Anna Depukat, Ł. Cichocki, Krzysztof Wojtasik-Bakalarz, Małgorzata Bryła, Kamila Wronkowicz, Małgorzata Dudek, Małgorzata Prus-Piotrowicz, M. Łukawska, Martyna Kędziora-Wysocka, Aleksandra Woszczenko, A. Cechnicki
{"title":"Subjective evaluation of admission and first days of hospitalization at a psychiatric ward from the perspective of patients","authors":"P. Błądziński, Marta Hat, A. Daren, Dawid Kruk, Anna Depukat, Ł. Cichocki, Krzysztof Wojtasik-Bakalarz, Małgorzata Bryła, Kamila Wronkowicz, Małgorzata Dudek, Małgorzata Prus-Piotrowicz, M. Łukawska, Martyna Kędziora-Wysocka, Aleksandra Woszczenko, A. Cechnicki","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2020.94694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: An assessment of the subjective experience of admission and first days of hospitalization at a psychiatric hospital and an analysis of its associations with socio-demographic and clinical factors. Methods: Analyses comprised data on 297 subjects. Diagnoses comprised the whole spectrum of F0-F9 according to ICD-10, the most numerous being F2 (39%), F1 (17%), F3 (16%) and F0 (11%). 30% of the subjects were hospitalised for the first time and 18% were admitted without consent. They were asked to evaluate the situation of being admitted and the first days of their hospitalization 4 to 10 days after the admission. The FEA-P questionnaire was used, with seven dimensions: attitude towards staff, explanation of treatment plan, housing conditions, critical remarks to staff, perception of other patients, perception of ward rules and ward atmosphere. Women from female units were more critical than men. The investigated predictors explained from 11% to 20% of different aspects of the experi- ence of admission and first days of hospitalization. Conclusions: The majority of respondents assessed positively all aspects of admission and their first days of hospitalization. One of the most important predictors of higher ratings of the admission and first days of hospitalization was the older age of the subjects. Moreover, more critical evaluation was related to the type of ward (co-educational or single-sex) the subjects were staying in, with women from female units showing the most critical appraisals. The results obtained point to the significance of both demographic variables as well as the surroundings as regards the reception of the situation of admission into hospital.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/ppn.2020.94694","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2020.94694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: An assessment of the subjective experience of admission and first days of hospitalization at a psychiatric hospital and an analysis of its associations with socio-demographic and clinical factors. Methods: Analyses comprised data on 297 subjects. Diagnoses comprised the whole spectrum of F0-F9 according to ICD-10, the most numerous being F2 (39%), F1 (17%), F3 (16%) and F0 (11%). 30% of the subjects were hospitalised for the first time and 18% were admitted without consent. They were asked to evaluate the situation of being admitted and the first days of their hospitalization 4 to 10 days after the admission. The FEA-P questionnaire was used, with seven dimensions: attitude towards staff, explanation of treatment plan, housing conditions, critical remarks to staff, perception of other patients, perception of ward rules and ward atmosphere. Women from female units were more critical than men. The investigated predictors explained from 11% to 20% of different aspects of the experi- ence of admission and first days of hospitalization. Conclusions: The majority of respondents assessed positively all aspects of admission and their first days of hospitalization. One of the most important predictors of higher ratings of the admission and first days of hospitalization was the older age of the subjects. Moreover, more critical evaluation was related to the type of ward (co-educational or single-sex) the subjects were staying in, with women from female units showing the most critical appraisals. The results obtained point to the significance of both demographic variables as well as the surroundings as regards the reception of the situation of admission into hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从患者的角度对精神科病房入院和住院第一天的主观评价
目的:评估精神病院入院和住院第一天的主观体验,并分析其与社会人口和临床因素的关系。方法:对297名受试者的资料进行分析。根据ICD-10,诊断包括F0- f9的全谱,最多的是F2 (39%), F1 (17%), F3(16%)和F0(11%)。30%的受试者为首次住院,18%未经同意入院。他们被要求对入院情况和入院后4至10天的住院第一天进行评估。采用FEA-P问卷,共7个维度:对工作人员的态度、治疗方案的解释、住房条件、对工作人员的批评意见、对其他患者的看法、对病房规则的看法和病房氛围。来自女性单位的女性比男性更挑剔。被调查的预测因子解释了11%到20%的入院和住院第一天经历的不同方面。结论:大多数受访者对入院和住院第一天的所有方面都进行了积极评价。入院和住院第一天评分较高的最重要预测因素之一是受试者的年龄较大。此外,更苛刻的评价与受试者所住的病房类型(男女同校或单性别)有关,来自女性病房的女性表现出最苛刻的评价。所获得的结果表明,人口统计变量和周围环境对住院情况的接收都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual basis of addiction memory, allostasis and dual processes, and the classical therapy of addiction. Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions Pulmonary embolism masked by symptoms of mental disorders The COVID-19 pandemic: new challenges for the mental health protection system The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale as an instrument for assessing quality – a psychometric evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1