The Politics of Production in the Engineering Industry

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Labour History Review Pub Date : 2016-04-18 DOI:10.3828/LHR.2016.1
Kevin Whitston
{"title":"The Politics of Production in the Engineering Industry","authors":"Kevin Whitston","doi":"10.3828/LHR.2016.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to connect work and politics in the engineering industry in the twentieth century. It is about how shared identities were created from overlapping and conflicting shop-floor interests and the political ambiguities generated by this experience. There is still much to be said for Hobsbawm’s account of how the workplace experience of the engineering craftsmen drew many to revolutionary politics but it captures only part of the story. The experience that led some craftsmen to the Communist Party persuaded others to disengage from politics and some to cut their links with craft altogether, joining the sections set up for the union’s industrial membership. Semi-skilled and unskilled workers were integrated in shop-floor trade unionism but, like the skilled men who opted for industrial membership, left the business of the ‘The Union’ to others. Militant trade unionism and the intensely political internal life of the union masked a deeper political alienation.","PeriodicalId":43028,"journal":{"name":"Labour History Review","volume":"81 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/LHR.2016.1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/LHR.2016.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article seeks to connect work and politics in the engineering industry in the twentieth century. It is about how shared identities were created from overlapping and conflicting shop-floor interests and the political ambiguities generated by this experience. There is still much to be said for Hobsbawm’s account of how the workplace experience of the engineering craftsmen drew many to revolutionary politics but it captures only part of the story. The experience that led some craftsmen to the Communist Party persuaded others to disengage from politics and some to cut their links with craft altogether, joining the sections set up for the union’s industrial membership. Semi-skilled and unskilled workers were integrated in shop-floor trade unionism but, like the skilled men who opted for industrial membership, left the business of the ‘The Union’ to others. Militant trade unionism and the intensely political internal life of the union masked a deeper political alienation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程行业中的生产政治
本文试图将20世纪工程行业中的工作与政治联系起来。它是关于如何从重叠和冲突的车间利益和这种经历产生的政治模糊性中创造出共同的身份。霍布斯鲍姆关于工程工匠的工作经历如何吸引许多人参与革命政治的描述还有很多可说的,但它只抓住了故事的一部分。一些工匠加入共产党的经历说服了另一些人脱离政治,一些人完全切断了与手工艺的联系,加入了为工会工业会员而设立的部门。半熟练工人和非技术工人被纳入车间工会,但就像技术工人选择加入工业工会一样,他们把“工会”的业务留给了其他人。激进的工会主义和工会内部激烈的政治生活掩盖了更深层次的政治异化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Boundary Review and the Organization and Identity of the Peterborough Divisional Labour Party Not an Industrial Matter: The British Trade Union Movement and Zionism, 1936–1967 ‘The Most Consistent of Them All’: William Sharman Crawford and the Politics of Suffrage In Defence of Steel: The Expulsion of Alfred Edwards MP and His Campaign against Steel Nationalization, 1948–1951 Patriotic Internationalists and Free Immigration: The British Labour Party’s Internationalism in Debates on Immigration Restriction, 1918–1931
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1