The return of historical monuments removed from the territory of Ukraine after 2014. Problems of archaeological research in times of war

IF 6.3 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Foreign Affairs Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.46493/2663-2675.33(3).2023.17-27
Kasa Arlind
{"title":"The return of historical monuments removed from the territory of Ukraine after 2014. Problems of archaeological research in times of war","authors":"Kasa Arlind","doi":"10.46493/2663-2675.33(3).2023.17-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the research is conditioned upon the increase in the national consciousness of the Ukrainian nation, a new stage of the national revival of the Ukrainian state and consolidation of the Ukrainian people against the background of the full-scale invasion and occupation of Ukrainian territories. The purpose of this research is to explore the level of threat to the national historical and cultural heritage in Ukraine, including the temporarily occupied territories. The research methodology used in this work is a comprehensive combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis of archaeological and cultural monuments, and the following methods: ascent, synthesis, analysis, comparison, and the axiomatic method. As a result of the study, the main regions of historical and cultural monuments in the temporarily occupied territories and in the areas where hostilities are conducted were explored. The research examines the competent opinion of leading Ukrainian historians and archaeologists on the main problems of archaeological research and the restitution of the treasures of Ukrainian culture temporarily seized by the occupier. The legal foundations of such restitution are established in the context of the main provisions of national and international humanitarian law. These circumstances were the prerequisites for the cancellation of the decision of the District Court of Amsterdam in favour of the Ukrainian party. It is substantiated that the position of the authorities of the Kingdom of the Netherlands does not comply with the statute of legal identity and independence of the State and ignores the inviolability of property rights. Although, in turn, the country is based on the declaration of compliance with international law on the legal immunity of the state and its property, as established by the 2004 UN Convention. The conclusions presented based on them contain updated scientific knowledge on the areas of restoration of a fair legal status to the historical and cultural heritage of the Ukrainian nation and bring to science relevant scientific and practical recommendations for improving the current legislation of Ukraine in the field of museum and archaeological science","PeriodicalId":12371,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.33(3).2023.17-27","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The relevance of the research is conditioned upon the increase in the national consciousness of the Ukrainian nation, a new stage of the national revival of the Ukrainian state and consolidation of the Ukrainian people against the background of the full-scale invasion and occupation of Ukrainian territories. The purpose of this research is to explore the level of threat to the national historical and cultural heritage in Ukraine, including the temporarily occupied territories. The research methodology used in this work is a comprehensive combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis of archaeological and cultural monuments, and the following methods: ascent, synthesis, analysis, comparison, and the axiomatic method. As a result of the study, the main regions of historical and cultural monuments in the temporarily occupied territories and in the areas where hostilities are conducted were explored. The research examines the competent opinion of leading Ukrainian historians and archaeologists on the main problems of archaeological research and the restitution of the treasures of Ukrainian culture temporarily seized by the occupier. The legal foundations of such restitution are established in the context of the main provisions of national and international humanitarian law. These circumstances were the prerequisites for the cancellation of the decision of the District Court of Amsterdam in favour of the Ukrainian party. It is substantiated that the position of the authorities of the Kingdom of the Netherlands does not comply with the statute of legal identity and independence of the State and ignores the inviolability of property rights. Although, in turn, the country is based on the declaration of compliance with international law on the legal immunity of the state and its property, as established by the 2004 UN Convention. The conclusions presented based on them contain updated scientific knowledge on the areas of restoration of a fair legal status to the historical and cultural heritage of the Ukrainian nation and bring to science relevant scientific and practical recommendations for improving the current legislation of Ukraine in the field of museum and archaeological science
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014年后从乌克兰领土上移走的历史古迹的归还。战争时期考古研究的问题
该研究的相关性取决于乌克兰民族民族意识的增强,乌克兰国家民族复兴的新阶段和乌克兰人民在全面入侵和占领乌克兰领土的背景下的巩固。本研究的目的是探讨对乌克兰国家历史和文化遗产的威胁程度,包括临时占领的领土。本工作采用的研究方法是对考古和文化古迹进行定量和定性分析的综合结合,采用上升法、综合法、分析法、比较法和公理法。研究的结果是,对临时被占领领土和发生敌对行动地区的主要历史和文化古迹区域进行了探索。这项研究考察了乌克兰主要历史学家和考古学家关于考古研究和归还被占领者暂时占领的乌克兰文化宝藏的主要问题的权威意见。这种恢复的法律基础是在国家和国际人道主义法的主要规定范围内确定的。这些情况是取消阿姆斯特丹地区法院对乌克兰一方有利的判决的先决条件。事实证明,荷兰王国当局的立场不符合关于国家的法律身份和独立性的规约,并且无视财产权的不可侵犯性。尽管反过来,该国的依据是声明遵守2004年《联合国公约》所确立的关于国家及其财产的法律豁免的国际法。在此基础上提出的结论载有关于恢复乌克兰民族历史和文化遗产的公平法律地位领域的最新科学知识,并为改进乌克兰在博物馆和考古科学领域的现行立法提出了有关的科学和实际建议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Founded in 1922, Foreign Affairs is a prominent American magazine that focuses on international relations and U.S. foreign policy. It is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, an esteemed nonpartisan think tank and membership organization dedicated to analyzing U.S. foreign policy and global affairs. While the print magazine is released every two months, the website offers daily articles and publishes anthologies every other month.
期刊最新文献
Britain, Europe and the World 1850-1986 The Collective and the Individual in Russia Fathers Work for Their Sons Restoration of Ukraine’s foreign policy activities in the context of the founding of the United Nations Historical-retrospective and legal analysis of the conditions, values and consequences of the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1