From Lessons Learned the Hard Way to Lessons Learned the Harder Way.

A. Schwegler
{"title":"From Lessons Learned the Hard Way to Lessons Learned the Harder Way.","authors":"A. Schwegler","doi":"10.46504/08201303fo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My departure from traditional methods of teaching and assessment (i.e., lecture and close-ended exams) was prompted years ago by a “gut feeling” that has morphed into an explicit examination of my teaching practice and students’ reactions to it. The scholarly approach and empirical evidence in “Teachers and Learning” (Hutchings, Huber & Ciccone, 2011, Chapter 2) provided me with the scientific and social support I needed to publically challenge existing norms regarding teaching practices, reevaluate my data collection efforts, and advocate for change based on best practices, not on tradition, both inside my classroom and beyond. So there I was, less than a year into my first assistant professor position, teaching on a July afternoon in a poorly vented classroom in Texas. I was deeply involved in an animated lecture about an event I had experienced as a public school teacher that beautifully demonstrated a concept for the Educational Psychology course I was teaching, when a student in the front row looked at her watch. At that moment, I questioned everything I knew about teaching. I froze mid-sentence and stared in disbelief at the students in the room. How could they consider checking the time in the midst of my thoroughlyresearched, well-crafted example? How could they be distracted by hunger or heat in the room with such an excellent example of faculty engagement, enthusiasm, and preparation before them? How could they be anticipating the end of class, just 20","PeriodicalId":30055,"journal":{"name":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","volume":"8 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46504/08201303fo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

My departure from traditional methods of teaching and assessment (i.e., lecture and close-ended exams) was prompted years ago by a “gut feeling” that has morphed into an explicit examination of my teaching practice and students’ reactions to it. The scholarly approach and empirical evidence in “Teachers and Learning” (Hutchings, Huber & Ciccone, 2011, Chapter 2) provided me with the scientific and social support I needed to publically challenge existing norms regarding teaching practices, reevaluate my data collection efforts, and advocate for change based on best practices, not on tradition, both inside my classroom and beyond. So there I was, less than a year into my first assistant professor position, teaching on a July afternoon in a poorly vented classroom in Texas. I was deeply involved in an animated lecture about an event I had experienced as a public school teacher that beautifully demonstrated a concept for the Educational Psychology course I was teaching, when a student in the front row looked at her watch. At that moment, I questioned everything I knew about teaching. I froze mid-sentence and stared in disbelief at the students in the room. How could they consider checking the time in the midst of my thoroughlyresearched, well-crafted example? How could they be distracted by hunger or heat in the room with such an excellent example of faculty engagement, enthusiasm, and preparation before them? How could they be anticipating the end of class, just 20
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从惨痛的教训到惨痛的教训。
几年前,一种“直觉”促使我放弃了传统的教学和评估方法(即授课和封闭式考试),这种“直觉”已经演变成对我的教学实践和学生反应的明确检验。《教师与学习》(Hutchings, Huber & Ciccone, 2011,第2章)中的学术方法和经验证据为我提供了我需要的科学和社会支持,以公开挑战有关教学实践的现有规范,重新评估我的数据收集工作,并在课堂内外倡导基于最佳实践而不是传统的变革。于是,在我上任不到一年的第一个助理教授职位上,七月的一个下午,我在德克萨斯州一间通风不良的教室里教书。我正在全神贯注地听一场动画讲座,讲的是我作为一名公立学校教师所经历的一件事,它完美地展示了我所教授的教育心理学课程的一个概念,当时前排的一个学生看了看手表。在那一刻,我质疑我所知道的关于教学的一切。我说到一半愣住了,难以置信地盯着教室里的学生。他们怎么能考虑在我经过彻底研究、精心制作的例子中检查时间呢?他们怎么可能因为教室里的饥饿或炎热而分心呢?在他们面前有这样一个优秀的教师参与、热情和准备的例子?他们怎么能预计到20分钟下课呢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Attaining an Undergraduate Certificate on Older Adults: Examining Qualitative Experiences of Students Developmental Relationships: An Examination into the Perceptions of Students on Their Relationships with Faculty Members Can We Please Rethink the Discussion Board? New Superheroes/Villain Characters for Teaching Engineering Materials Selection Asynchronous Online Discussion Forums: Effective Undergraduate and Graduate Course Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1