Vocabulary demands for engineering students studying English in Russia: Comparing ESP course materials across three engineering disciplines

Tatiana Nekrasova-Beker
{"title":"Vocabulary demands for engineering students studying English in Russia: Comparing ESP course materials across three engineering disciplines","authors":"Tatiana Nekrasova-Beker","doi":"10.4079/gbl.v20.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With English language instruction becoming increasingly more specialized in higher education institutions around the globe, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) practitioners are facing a unique challenge in developing language courses that require considerable knowledge of a specific discipline in order to make it applicable to students and to meet their specific language needs. In the case of Engineering, which is the target discipline in this study, substantial empirical research has been published describing general discipline-specific requirements as well as common challenges that second language (L2) students face in various pedagogical contexts (e.g., Kaewpet, 2009; Pritchard & Nasr, 2004; Rowley-Jolivet, 2015; Rozycki & Johnson, 2013). Yet research investigating the vocabulary demands of pedagogical materials utilized in various sub-fields within the same discipline is limited. Therefore, the present study examined the extent to which the vocabulary demands of the pedagogical materials employed in ESP courses in Thermal-Power, Computer, and Chemical Engineering in Russia were comparable across the courses and achievable for the students. The results indicated that vocabulary coverage varied considerably across the three disciplines, with Chemical Engineering texts requiring the largest vocabulary size for adequate comprehension. The implications of the study for materials development and teaching ESP courses in various Engineering sub-fields are discussed.","PeriodicalId":34034,"journal":{"name":"Global Business Languages","volume":"20 1","pages":"159-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4079/gbl.v20.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With English language instruction becoming increasingly more specialized in higher education institutions around the globe, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) practitioners are facing a unique challenge in developing language courses that require considerable knowledge of a specific discipline in order to make it applicable to students and to meet their specific language needs. In the case of Engineering, which is the target discipline in this study, substantial empirical research has been published describing general discipline-specific requirements as well as common challenges that second language (L2) students face in various pedagogical contexts (e.g., Kaewpet, 2009; Pritchard & Nasr, 2004; Rowley-Jolivet, 2015; Rozycki & Johnson, 2013). Yet research investigating the vocabulary demands of pedagogical materials utilized in various sub-fields within the same discipline is limited. Therefore, the present study examined the extent to which the vocabulary demands of the pedagogical materials employed in ESP courses in Thermal-Power, Computer, and Chemical Engineering in Russia were comparable across the courses and achievable for the students. The results indicated that vocabulary coverage varied considerably across the three disciplines, with Chemical Engineering texts requiring the largest vocabulary size for adequate comprehension. The implications of the study for materials development and teaching ESP courses in various Engineering sub-fields are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在俄罗斯学习英语的工科学生的词汇需求:比较三个工程学科的ESP课程材料
随着全球高等教育机构的英语教学变得越来越专业化,专门用途英语(ESP)从业者在开发语言课程方面面临着独特的挑战,这些课程需要相当多的特定学科知识,才能使其适用于学生并满足他们的特定语言需求。就本研究的目标学科工程而言,已经发表了大量的实证研究,描述了第二语言(L2)学生在各种教学环境中面临的一般学科特定要求以及共同挑战(例如,Kaewpet, 2009;Pritchard & Nasr, 2004;Rowley-Jolivet, 2015;Rozycki & Johnson, 2013)。然而,在同一学科的各个子领域中,对教材词汇需求的调查研究是有限的。因此,本研究考察了俄罗斯热电、计算机和化学工程专业ESP课程中所使用的教学材料的词汇需求在多大程度上是跨课程可比性的,并且是学生可以达到的。结果表明,三个学科的词汇覆盖范围差异很大,化学工程文本需要最大的词汇量才能充分理解。讨论了该研究对材料开发和工程各子领域ESP课程教学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and Effectiveness of a Rater Training Curriculum for Evaluating Student Medical Spanish Oral Proficiency Using the Physician Oral Language Observation Matrix A Task-Based Road Map to Teaching Business Spanish with Word Combinations Incorporating Translation and Interpreting into the Business Language Classroom Toward the Systematic Integration of Naturalistic Inquiry in LSP Research Autoethnography: An Examination of the Self, Language for Specific Purposes, and Departmental Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1