A scenario approach to estimate the maximum foreseeable loss for buildings due to an earthquake in Cape Town

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Actuarial Journal Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.4314/SAAJ.V15I1.1
A. Kijko, A. Smit, Natalie Van De Coolwijk
{"title":"A scenario approach to estimate the maximum foreseeable loss for buildings due to an earthquake in Cape Town","authors":"A. Kijko, A. Smit, Natalie Van De Coolwijk","doi":"10.4314/SAAJ.V15I1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A methodology for the assessment of the probable maximum loss associated with an earthquake is described and applied to the Cape Town central business district. The calculations are based on the effect of the two largest earthquakes that occurred in Milnerton in 1809 and Ceres–Tulbagh in 1969. The investigation concludes that if buildings and infrastructure in an area follow the SANS Standard 10160 for seismic loading of 0.1 g, they are exposed to significant seismic risk. The main purpose of this research is not the accurate quantification of expected losses to Cape Town’s infrastructure, but to raise awareness between civil engineers, the insurance industry and disaster management agencies that seismic hazard is an issue in South Africa and must be considered as a potential threat to its residents and infrastructure. Keywords: Probable maximum loss (PML); seismic risk; hazard; expected damage; Cape Town; short-term insurance","PeriodicalId":40732,"journal":{"name":"South African Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V15I1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A methodology for the assessment of the probable maximum loss associated with an earthquake is described and applied to the Cape Town central business district. The calculations are based on the effect of the two largest earthquakes that occurred in Milnerton in 1809 and Ceres–Tulbagh in 1969. The investigation concludes that if buildings and infrastructure in an area follow the SANS Standard 10160 for seismic loading of 0.1 g, they are exposed to significant seismic risk. The main purpose of this research is not the accurate quantification of expected losses to Cape Town’s infrastructure, but to raise awareness between civil engineers, the insurance industry and disaster management agencies that seismic hazard is an issue in South Africa and must be considered as a potential threat to its residents and infrastructure. Keywords: Probable maximum loss (PML); seismic risk; hazard; expected damage; Cape Town; short-term insurance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种情景方法来估计开普敦地震对建筑物造成的最大可预见损失
本文描述了一种评估地震可能造成的最大损失的方法,并将其应用于开普敦中央商务区。这些计算是基于1809年发生在米尔顿和1969年发生在谷神星-图巴格的两次最大地震的影响。调查得出的结论是,如果一个地区的建筑物和基础设施遵循0.1 g地震荷载的SANS标准10160,它们将面临重大的地震风险。这项研究的主要目的不是准确量化开普敦基础设施的预期损失,而是提高土木工程师、保险业和灾害管理机构之间的认识,即地震危害是南非的一个问题,必须将其视为对其居民和基础设施的潜在威胁。关键词:最大可能损失;地震风险;风险;预期损失;开普敦;短期保险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Actuarial Journal
South African Actuarial Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-selection in voluntary health insurance markets: A focus on medical schemes in South Africa Quantitative guidelines for retiring (more safely) in South Africa Suitability of the 2.5% net discount rate for quantum of damage calculations in South Africa An economic scenario generator for embedded derivatives in South Africa The impact of giving and receiving remittances on life insurance purchases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1