Frequency of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cervicogenic headache

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology Asia Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.54029/2023rzc
Savaş Karpuz, Ramazan Yılmaz, Emine Akdere, A. Küçük, Havva Cop, H. Yılmaz
{"title":"Frequency of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cervicogenic headache","authors":"Savaş Karpuz, Ramazan Yılmaz, Emine Akdere, A. Küçük, Havva Cop, H. Yılmaz","doi":"10.54029/2023rzc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Both primary and secondary headaches have been associated with cognitive dysfunction and depression. Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of cervicogenic headache on cognitive function, quality of life and mood.\nMethods: This single-center, cross-sectional comparative study includes 30 patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache by a neurologist and 30 healthy controls. The pain level of the participants was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), their mood with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, their quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and their cognitive status by a psychologist with the Standard Mini Mental Test (SMMT) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA).\nResults: All MoCA domains except for orientation and the SMMT scores were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group compared to the control group (p< 0,05). In addition, scores for the pain catastrophizing scale and selected SF-36 sub-parameters (physical function, physical role difficulty, social functionality, pain and general health perception) were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group (p< 0,05). The Beck Depression Inventory score was significantly higher in patients with cervicogenic headache than in the control group (p=0.018).\nConclusion: Patients with cervicogenic headache exhibit worse cognitive performance during their headache. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, they had higher rates of depression and pain catastrophizing as well as a lower quality of life.","PeriodicalId":49757,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Asia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Asia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54029/2023rzc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both primary and secondary headaches have been associated with cognitive dysfunction and depression. Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of cervicogenic headache on cognitive function, quality of life and mood. Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional comparative study includes 30 patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache by a neurologist and 30 healthy controls. The pain level of the participants was evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), their mood with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, their quality of life with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and their cognitive status by a psychologist with the Standard Mini Mental Test (SMMT) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA). Results: All MoCA domains except for orientation and the SMMT scores were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group compared to the control group (p< 0,05). In addition, scores for the pain catastrophizing scale and selected SF-36 sub-parameters (physical function, physical role difficulty, social functionality, pain and general health perception) were significantly lower in the cervicogenic headache group (p< 0,05). The Beck Depression Inventory score was significantly higher in patients with cervicogenic headache than in the control group (p=0.018). Conclusion: Patients with cervicogenic headache exhibit worse cognitive performance during their headache. Additionally, compared to healthy controls, they had higher rates of depression and pain catastrophizing as well as a lower quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈源性头痛患者认知功能障碍的频率
背景:原发性和继发性头痛都与认知功能障碍和抑郁有关。目的:探讨颈源性头痛对认知功能、生活质量和情绪的影响。方法:这项单中心、横断面比较研究包括30名由神经科医生诊断为颈源性头痛的患者和30名健康对照。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估受试者的疼痛水平,采用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和疼痛灾难化量表评估受试者的情绪,采用SF-36量表评估受试者的生活质量,并由心理学家采用标准迷你心理测验(SMMT)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估受试者的认知状况。结果:颈源性头痛组除定向外,其余MoCA域和SMMT评分均显著低于对照组(p< 0.05)。此外,宫颈源性头痛组的疼痛灾难化量表和选定的SF-36子参数(身体功能、身体角色困难、社会功能、疼痛和总体健康感知)得分显著低于对照组(p< 0.05)。颈源性头痛患者的贝克抑郁量表评分显著高于对照组(p=0.018)。结论:颈源性头痛患者在头痛时认知能力较差。此外,与健康对照组相比,他们有更高的抑郁和疼痛灾难发生率,生活质量也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology Asia
Neurology Asia CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Asia (ISSN 1823-6138), previously known as Neurological Journal of South East Asia (ISSN 1394-780X), is the official journal of the ASEAN Neurological Association (ASNA), Asian & Oceanian Association of Neurology (AOAN), and the Asian & Oceanian Child Neurology Association. The primary purpose is to publish the results of study and research in neurology, with emphasis to neurological diseases occurring primarily in Asia, aspects of the diseases peculiar to Asia, and practices of neurology in Asia (Asian neurology).
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristic and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a cohort of Thai patients Mitochondrial DNA 3252A>G mutation presenting as MERRF/MELAS overlapping syndrome: A case report Serum YKL-40 (chitinase 3-like protein 1) levels in migraine patients during an attack The effect of internet-based telehealth nursing on the quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation and stroke Cumulative seizure occurrence and the predictors of seizure in low- and high-grade gliomas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1